Trade in the balance:
Europe’s new Union
Customs Code
New customs rules are creating fresh
opportunities and challenges for every business
that imports or exports goods in or out of the
European Union
. II
White & Case
. Europe’s new Union
Customs Code
The European Union—the world’s largest trader of
manufactured goods and services—is adopting a new
framework of customs rules, the Union Customs Code (UCC)
F
rom cutting-edge California
mobile devices and Chinese
manufactured products
sold throughout Europe to
French luxury items and German
automobiles exported around
the world, companies that can
move their goods efï¬ciently
and cost-effectively across the
European Union (EU)’s borders gain
advantages in time and money.
Now, for the ï¬rst time in more
than 20 years, the UCC is changing
the rules on the cross-border
movement of goods in the EU—
the world’s largest trading block.
On the surface, the UCC may
appear to be yet another set of
prosaic regulatory updates. In fact,
some of these changes affect basic
principles of international trade and
create challenges and opportunities
for every business that imports or
exports goods in or out of the EU.
With that in mind, here is a
practical analysis of the EU’s new
customs rules.
THE NEW CUSTOMS
RULES IN CONTEXT
The UCC, which takes effect
on 1 May 2016, replaces the
EU’s previous customs code.
The EU codiï¬ed its customs
rules for the ï¬rst time as the
Community Customs Code (CCC)
in 1992. A longstanding process
to modernize EU customs rules
led to the adoption of the UCC in
late 2013 and key implementing
rules in December 2015.
Although the UCC will apply
starting 1 May 2016, it may likely
take until the end of 2020 to put
in place all of the IT systems
necessary to implement all
UCC provisions. Transitional
rules will apply in the interim.
The UCC is intended to achieve
greater consistency among EU
Member States on key customs
issues and to create a fully
interoperable electronic customs
system linking the Member
States’ national systems through
a single interface.
The UCC should
reduce customs compliance
costs for certain “trustworthy”
EU businesses, in an attempt to
improve the balance between
heightened security (through
measures introduced following the
9/11 attacks) and easier international
trade. At the same time, it will
make the customs process more
difï¬cult for businesses that do not
have this “trustworthy” status.
So this is a story of both added
beneï¬ts and increased burdens.
For the ï¬rst time in more
than 20 years, the world’s
largest trading block is
substantially revising the rules
on how to access a market
of 500 million consumers.
Trade in the balance: Europe’s new Union Customs Code
. The EU grants Member States
considerable leeway to decide
how they will interpret and
implement certain rules.
OBSTACLES TO A TRUE
CUSTOMS UNION
The EU is a customs union, which
means that all 28 EU Member
States count as one territory—and
that all Member States supposedly
apply the same external tariffs to all
non-EU imports and follow the same
EU customs rules. In practice, the
way companies clear goods through
customs and the amount of import
duties they ultimately pay can vary
considerably, depending on the
Member State in which they operate.
Despite a history of continuous
revisions to the CCC and the
replacement of the CCC with the
UCC, the EU remains far from a true
customs union. Building this type
of union has been—and, under the
UCC, will likely remain—a gradual
process for several key reasons:
No central EU customs agency—
In the United States (for example),
US Customs and Border Protection
enforces and interprets all US
customs rules for all 50 states.
The EU, by contrast, leaves each
of the 28 Member States’ national
customs administrations largely in
charge, inevitably leading to different
decisions—even though they
operate within the same framework.
Insufï¬cient political support for a
powerful central EU customs agency
reflects the tensions between
EU-level institutions seeking broad
consistency and most EU countries,
which are reluctant to give up
sovereignty in this area. This creates
several hurdles for companies
seeking to ensure that their EU
competitors do not receive more
favourable treatment than they do.
Broad discretion among Member
States to implement certain
rules—The EU grants Member
States considerable leeway to
decide how they will interpret and
implement certain rules.
As a result,
varying national preferences have led
to different enforcement cultures.
For example, because Member
States were allowed to develop
electronic customs systems at
their own pace (depending on their
available resources and political will)
and in their own way, companies
now face 28 different electronic
customs systems that are not
linked together. In addition, some
Member States currently allow
companies to use certain simpliï¬ed
procedures without requiring a
ï¬nancial guarantee to cover potential
customs duties, while others do not.
No consistent penalties for
infringement—There are no
consistent EU penalties for
companies that infringe customs
rules. This means an identical
infringement (such as classifying
a shipment under the wrong tariff
heading) can create vastly different
consequences in different Member
States.
Assuming that customs
authorities discover an infringement
in the ï¬rst place (since their levels of
audit and enforcement also differ), a
company’s penalty could range from
simply self-disclosing the error and
paying the unpaid duties (without a
ï¬nancial penalty) to possible severe
criminal penalties and seizure of
goods. A 2013 European Commission
proposal for more consistent
rules is progressing extremely
slowly, and no revolutionary EU
legislation should be expected
in the short term on this topic.
Despite these obstacles to
eventually building a true customs
union, each EU Member State
will have to implement the
new UCC rules immediately.
This will have far-reaching
effects on global businesses.
28 European Union Member States (2015)
Austria
Portugal
Finland
Latvia
Romania
Bulgaria
France
Lithuania
Slovakia
Croatia
Germany
Luxembourg
Slovenia
Cyprus
Greece
Malta
Spain
Czech Republic
Hungary
Netherlands
Sweden
Denmark
White & Case
Italy
Belgium
2
Estonia
Ireland
Poland
United Kingdom
. NEW BENEFITS FROM
THE UCC
By simplifying and consolidating
certain customs rules, the UCC
will likely create several new
opportunities for EU importers and
exporters. Some highlights include:
Simpliï¬cations for
“trustworthy” EU companies
Currently, companies that meet
EU criteria to be designated an
Authorized Economic Operator
(AEO) beneï¬t from several
“simpliï¬cations” (such as
easier customs declarations and
fewer customs controls on their
operations) that increase the
speed and lower the costs of the
customs process for them.
Under the UCC, additional
simpliï¬cations for companies that
are AEOs for customs simpliï¬cation
(AEOCs) should over time lead to
important savings in three key areas:
Centralized clearance—Once the
necessary supporting IT systems are
in place (planned for 2020), AEOCs
will be able to handle all customs
formalities for all Member States
through a single customs ofï¬ce.
Entry in the declarant’s records—
AEOCs will be able to make their
customs declarations in the form of
entries in their own records (EIDR),
rather than through normal customs
declarations, and without having
to present the goods physically to
customs, as long as the supervising
customs ofï¬ce has access to all
information necessary to examine
the goods, if it wishes.
Self-assessment—AEOCs with
authorization to use the EIDR
procedure may also be allowed to
determine the amount of import or
export duties payable and to carry
out certain controls—tasks normally
handled by customs authorities.
These companies must then pay
duties and submit details at regular
intervals so that the customs
authorities can check how the duties
were calculated.
More uniform
classiï¬cations of goods
The UCC will introduce more
efï¬cient procedures to deï¬ne EU
customs classiï¬cations. If Member
States diverge on how to classify
identical or similar goods, those
Member States’ experts and the
European Commission will work
within the special EU-level Tariff
and Statistical Nomenclature
Committee to determine uniform
tariff headings. The UCC will improve
the rules to foster more rapid
discussions under strict deadlines.
This should allow the European
Commission and Member States
to decide a common EU approach
more swiftly in the future.
More flexible and user-friendly
special procedures
Under the UCC, authorizations for
customs procedures that suspend
the payment of duties will last
longer.
Internet retail sales will be
possible from customs warehouses.
And other procedures will become
more flexible.
For example, to obtain “inward
processing” authorization (relief
from customs duties and other
charges for goods that are imported
into the EU, processed and
then exported outside the EU),
companies will no longer need to
show a clear intent to export the
processed goods. They also will no
longer owe compensatory interest
if the processed goods are later
cleared for free circulation within
the EU. In addition, the customs
duties calculated on imports after
“outward processing” (which lets
companies temporarily export
goods from the EU for processing
and then claim full or partial duty
relief when they reimport the
goods) will be based on the cost
of the processing outside the EU,
rather than the previous calculation
(which was the amount of customs
duties on the exported products
minus the amount of customs
duties on the reimported goods).
By simplifying and consolidating
certain customs rules, the UCC
will likely create several new
opportunities for EU importers
and exporters.
Trade in the balance: Europe’s new Union Customs Code
3
.
4
White & Case
. A “POSITIVE STARTING POINT” FOR A LONG MARATHON
Dirk Jensen, Manager of Trade Compliance in EMEA for Celanese
Corporation, a global technology and specialty materials company,
shared some perspectives on how his complex, multinational
corporation will navigate the UCC’s new rules:
Q: Do you think most companies
are prepared to comply with the
UCC in 2016?
Jensen: It’s an enormous challenge
for nearly all of us. The EU ï¬nally
published detailed implementing
regulations for the UCC only in
December 2015. That left us just
four months to understand the
speciï¬c rules, alert our senior
management to the likely impact of
the impending changes and begin
to adjust our internal processes.
Companies tend to plan annual
budgets and other programs much
more than four months in advance.
The delayed regulations made it
extremely challenging to identify
the internal technological, ï¬nancial
and other resources we would
need to adapt in time to request
them for 2016. It also meant that
external training providers are
only now starting to offer UCC
training programs to help prepare
our in-house compliance teams.
Starting next year, it should be
easier to plan and budget for internal
systems adjustments, training
programs, authorization applications
and the many other steps we will
need to take.
At the moment, though,
we are working as hard as we can
to adapt our global business to the
UCC’s requirements.
Q: What aspect of the UCC is most
likely to have a positive impact on
your operations?
Jensen: Currently, the EU includes
multiple, separate customs systems.
The UCC’s goal of a central customs
clearance process at each point of
entry into Europe could streamline
our transport timeline signiï¬cantly and
strengthen our supply chain security.
For example, a container ship full
of goods delivered to Rotterdam, the
Netherlands, and destined for one of
our facilities in Germany could arrive
as much as two days earlier if it only
needs to clear one European customs
process. Having large amounts of
materials more immediately available
for our operations would be so
beneï¬cial that our internal team
is already starting to get our systems
and processes ready to present the
proper electronic customs data as
soon as this option becomes available
and national customs systems can
share information with each other.
Q: What is your view of the UCC’s
new approach to classifying goods?
Jensen: From our perspective, a
more uniform classiï¬cation approach
throughout Europe would provide
greater conï¬dence in predicting the
amounts of customs duties. Knowing
that customs ofï¬cials in (for example)
Germany, the UK and Spain all will
use the same classiï¬cations for goods
will give us a more solid, reliable basis
for future decision making.
Q: Not all of your legal entities in
Europe have become Authorized
Economic Operators yet.
Might that
change once the UCC takes effect?
Jensen: The UCC has made
applying for AEO status more
appealing and necessary but also
more challenging. Although AEO
criteria will be more difï¬cult to meet
(including demonstrating a record of
customs and tax compliance as well
as in-house knowledge of customs
matters), we will need AEO status
to use certain simpliï¬ed customs
procedures. Applying for AEO status
could also drive us to build more
documented “trustworthy” internal
processes.
For us, these beneï¬ts may
likely outweigh the costs and time
involved in applying for AEO status.
Q: How do you feel overall
about the UCC?
Jensen: This feels like starting a
long marathon, where we have not
had enough information until now
to begin preparing to run. Adapting
to the UCC and making full use
of its opportunities in 2016 will be
challenging for us in many ways.
At the same time, the UCC should
over time improve several of Europe’s
customs processes and create
more stability for the import/export
community. So this is a positive
starting point.
Trade in the balance: Europe’s new Union Customs Code
5
.
6
White & Case
. KEY CHALLENGES
UNDER THE UCC
FIVE TIPS FOR ASIA-BASED EXPORTERS TO EUROPE
The UCC will pose several
challenges for businesses as well.
Some particular issues include:
Vast quantities of goods flow between Asia and the EU each year,
linking these two regions in powerful trade relationships.
Guarantees generally required
China, Japan and Korea all rank
among the EU’s top ten trading
partners, while Singapore is the
EU’s largest trading partner in the
Association of Southeast Asian
Nations (ASEAN). China, which
contributed only 7 percent of the
EU’s total trade in goods in 2002,
quickly rose to become the EU’s
second-largest trade partner by 2014.
These and other Asia-EU trade
relationships are likely to remain
robust and grow even further. This
makes it critical for Asia-based
exporters to understand how the
UCC will affect them.
The EU’s new rules are complex.
The UCC’s impact on Asian exporters
also may vary, depending on each
exporter’s country of origin, industry
sector and other business speciï¬cs.
Nonetheless, some key tips apply
for Asian exporters to the EU:
1. Remember: the “ï¬rst sale
rule” is no longer an option
Asia-based exporters often assume
that the “ï¬rst sale rule” (which
previously allowed businesses to
base their EU customs duties for
imported goods on the ï¬rst price paid
in a chain of sale by a middleman to
a manufacturer) is a normal business
practice to be factored into the
overall transaction cost.
But now,
the UCC’s “last sale rule” requires
customs duties to be based on the
last price paid before goods are
released for free circulation in the
EU. (See “How the UCC increases
customs duties for ï¬rst sale rule
users” on page 8.) Based on this,
Asia-based exporters may wish to
review their existing transaction
structures with EU-based importers
and decide whether to lower invoice
prices for their EU importers.
2. Prepare to provide
customs guarantees
The UCC’s new provisions require
businesses to provide guarantees
to ensure payment of any customs
duties.
This means Asia-based
companies exporting to the EU
will need to take stock of inventory
and plan ahead—both in terms
of available cash on hand and for
annual budgetary planning.
Under the previous CCC, Member
States had the discretion not to
require companies to provide a
ï¬nancial “guarantee” (either as a
cash deposit or a written agreement
to pay) in order to ensure payment
of any customs duties that might be
incurred later (for example, after full
details about speciï¬c goods and their
ï¬nal destinations become clear).
Under the UCC, all customs
procedures generally will require
companies to provide a guarantee
covering existing or potential
amounts they might later owe to
a customs authority, including for
example: placing goods in temporary
storage. This will require companies
to tie up more money in guarantees
in certain Member States. For
example, the United Kingdom will
now require a guarantee for new
inward processing authorizations.
Companies that meet AEO
criteria may beneï¬t in several
ways, including being able to
provide a comprehensive guarantee
that covers more transactions or
receiving waivers or reductions of
the guarantee amount normally
due.
If no guarantee was required
under pre-UCC authorizations, this
will remain the case until these
authorizations are reassessed.
3. Consider becoming an AEO
Under the UCC, companies
that meet Authorized Economic
Operator (AEO) criteria can provide
lower guarantees and receive
several other beneï¬ts. Obtaining
AEO status becomes even more
important for Asian businesses with
subsidiaries or branches in the EU.
Asian businesses that have not
yet applied for AEO status should
now give serious thought to the
process.
They also should establish
in-house internal compliance
training programs or seek external
assistance to ensure they beneï¬t
from all possible trade facilitative
simpliï¬cations under the UCC.
4. Plan carefully before requesting
Binding Tariff Information
Binding Tariff Information (BTI) is
a useful tool to know in advance
the tariff classiï¬cation of goods
and, accordingly, the amount
of the customs duty. A BTI may
be obtained from the customs
authority of any EU Member
State and will be binding for three
years.
However, Asian exporters
now must be more careful when
requesting a BTI and, in particular,
when constructing classiï¬cation
arguments and selecting a customs
authority. This is because the UCC
will no longer permit businesses
to “forum-shop” and ignore a BTI
if it is unfavorable to them.
More demanding AEO criteria
5. Be ready to show proof of origin
Asia-based companies that use
the EU’s Generalized Scheme of
Preferences (a program that makes
it easier for developing countries
to export their products to the EU
by letting them pay lower customs
duties) should also note the UCC’s
new requirements to provide proof
of preferential origin for imports.
While this additional requirement
is not overly burdensome, internal
awareness and preparation could
save time and money in the
customs clearance process.
Under the UCC, AEOs will have
to demonstrate a good record
of compliance with both tax and
customs rules and a sufï¬cient
level of relevant in-house practical
expertise to handle customs matters.
Generally speaking, EU companies
seeking to become or remain AEOs
will have to strengthen their internal
compliance policies and procedures
and ensure appropriate training of
key staff.
Because certain customs
simpliï¬cations under the UCC will
require compliance with AEO criteria,
companies that have not yet gone
through the AEO process will need to
assess whether to do so now.
Trade in the balance: Europe’s new Union Customs Code
7
. EU importers will no longer be
able to use the “ï¬rst sale rule” as
the basis for a customs valuation.
New valuation rules and
likely higher duties
EU importers will no longer be able to
use the “ï¬rst sale rule” as the basis
for a customs valuation. The ï¬rst sale
rule previously allowed importers
to pay customs duties based on
the (usually lower) price paid by a
middleman (an intermediary vendor)
to a manufacturer of goods instead
of the (usually higher) price paid to
that middleman by an EU importer.
Instead, the “last sale price” before
goods are released for free circulation
in the EU now must be the basis
for a customs valuation, unless the
import was based on a valid contract
concluded before 18 January 2016 (in
that case, the contract can be relied
on until the end of 2017). This will
increase customs duties for current
ï¬rst sale rule users and create a
competitive disadvantage compared
to US importers, for example, which
may still use the ï¬rst sale rule. See
“How the UCC increases customs
duties for ï¬rst sale rule users” below.
In addition, an ambiguously
phrased UCC implementing provision
could lead to sales from EU customs
warehouses serving as the basis
for customs valuations, which could
affect companies that traditionally
operate from warehouses.
The UCC may also require
companies to pay customs duties on
all royalties and license fees.
Under
the CCC, in line with international
trade law, these were only included
when they were related to the
goods and their payment was a
condition of the sale. Under the
UCC, this condition is less likely
to be checked systematically.
In addition, the UCC will
require companies to comply with
additional criteria when they seek
authorization to use a simpliï¬ed
valuation process (for example, if all
elements necessary to calculate a
customs value are not available at
the time of import and a customs
authority agrees to determine
the customs value for particular
goods based on speciï¬c criteria).
Binding Tariff Information
requests create greater risk
Companies looking for increased
legal certainty about their products’
classiï¬cations upon import into
the EU can seek Binding Tariff
Information (BTI) from a national
customs authority. A BTI permits
the relevant EU customs authority
to decide the appropriate tariff
heading, and then all other customs
authorities in the EU must respect
this decision when the BTI holder’s
goods are imported into their
territories.
Under the CCC, when a
BTI dictated a different tariff heading
than the one suggested by the
applicant, the BTI holder could easily
ignore a “bad” BTI if it resulted in
a higher duty rate. However, under
the UCC, existing and new BTIs
will become binding on BTI holders,
which must explicitly declare them
in their import declarations.
Different origin rules apply
For various reasons (such as to
determine whether or not commercial
policy measures apply, for possible
origin labelling or for statistical
purposes), a “non-preferential”
origin must be determined for all
goods imported into the EU. Under
the CCC, this origin was (with few
exceptions) considered to be that
of the country in which the “last
substantial transformation” of the
product occurred.
The UCC replaces
that vague origin concept with more
precise criteria by product category.
Some companies may prefer
this more objective approach,
since it provides greater legal
certainty. For others, it could
result in origin changes and
possibly anti-dumping duties on
certain products. Companies will
need to assess their particular
products against the new rules to
determine possible implications.
Existing authorizations
reassessed
Certain types of customs
warehouses will no longer exist
under the UCC.
This means
companies will have to apply for
new authorizations to use the
remaining warehouse options.
How the UCC increases customs duties for ï¬rst sale rule users
€15,000
Sale to EU
importer
€10,000
“First sale”
Manufacturer
(China)
Middleman
(Hong Kong)
BEFORE UCC
10% customs duty was €1,000
Retailer
(Europe)
UNDER THE UCC
10% customs duty is now €1,500
Customs duties are often determined as a percentage (10 percent in this example) of the value of goods. Goods often
cost less for the “ï¬rst sale” in a supply chain than they do for later sales. So, current ï¬rst sale rule users are likely to pay
signiï¬cantly more for customs duties under the UCC, depending on their individual supply chain structures.
8
White & Case
.
Existing CCC authorizations will
remain in place until the earlier
of their expiration date or 30 April
2019. By 1 May 2019, all existing
authorizations will be reassessed,
which may, for example, entail
different duty calculation rules
for goods covered by “inward”
or “outward” processing rules.
THE LIMITS OF CHANGE
Many companies will see little or no
UCC-related changes when using
certain duty-saving opportunities or
trying to protect certain interests.
For example, the EU’s duty
suspension and tariff quota rules
remain available for EU companies
unable to source sufï¬cient amounts
of components or intermediate
materials within the EU for their EU
production sites. In these cases,
companies can apply for temporary
suspensions of normal duties for
“input” materials. If a suspension
could damage planned or existing EU
production of these input materials,
the affected EU companies can
oppose it.
The EU list of suspensions
and tariff quotas is updated twice per
year, which means companies still
have regular opportunities to apply for
or oppose a suspension.
The UCC generally does not
change any preferential tariff
arrangements. One limited exception
is new requirements to deliver proof
of preferential origin for imports
under the EU’s Generalized Scheme
of Preferences (which allows
developing countries to pay lower
customs fees when exporting to the
EU) starting 1 January 2017
.
Companies can continue, in certain
cases, to obtain a downward revision
of the value of goods or import duty
amounts or a refund (for example,
if goods are defective or if tariff
preferences were not claimed at
initial import but proof of origin can
be supplied later).
Companies also will remain able
to invoke the “good faith clause”
in certain circumstances—though
meeting the precise conditions will
remain a challenge. For example,
this could be an option to avoid
payment of full customs duties
when a company has claimed
preferential tariff treatment for an
imported product that later turns out
not to have satisï¬ed the relevant
preferential origin rules.
Finally, the UCC will not affect
the EU’s current customs laws
protecting intellectual property rights.
Companies fearing that others are
importing counterfeit goods into the
EU can still ask customs authorities
to stop those goods at the border so
that court actions can be ï¬led against
an alleged infringer.
Trade in the balance: Europe’s new Union Customs Code
9
.
US companies trading globally
must bear in mind more than ever
that the EU customs rules may
differ in important respects from
US customs rules.
10
White & Case
. AIMING FOR COMPATIBLE CUSTOMS RULES,
BUT DIFFERENCES REMAIN
The EU and the United States (US) form the world’s largest bilateral
trade relationship. So the introduction of new customs rules in the EU
will signiï¬cantly affect US traders.
in the EU entitles them automatically
to receive C-TPAT beneï¬ts in the
US—and vice versa.
Post-UCC, US companies trading
globally must bear in mind more than
ever that the EU customs rules may
differ in important respects from US
customs rules.
While the US and the EU continue
to strive for compatible customs
rules through various negotiations
and arrangements, the UCC will
result in important new differences
in the customs treatment of goods
while retaining some key differences
already in place. A few important
examples include:
“First sale rule”—The removal of
the ability to use an earlier sale price
as the basis for a customs valuation
in the EU is likely the most important
change from a US perspective, as
the “ï¬rst sale rule” remains ï¬rmly
in place in the US. In the future, the
basis for valuation in the EU may
differ considerably from the basis in
the US, including for royalties and
license fees.
US traders will need to
prepare for this change.
C-TPAT v. AEO—Under a current
bilateral customs cooperation
agreement, the EU and the US
mutually recognize each other’s
trade partnership programs
(the Customs-Trade Partnership
Against Terrorism [C-TPAT] in the
US and AEO in the EU) to reduce
administrative efforts and time
required for customs clearance.
However, while the UCC’s more
demanding criteria for trusted traders
may bring the EU AEO program more
in line with US expectations that
companies have a strong compliance
program, there are still important
differences between the two
programs. For example, additional
simpliï¬cations introduced under the
UCC are only available for companies
that are AEOs for customs
simpliï¬cation (AEOCs), which fall
outside the mutual recognition
arrangement with the US (which only
covers AEOFs and AEOSs [AEOs
with a security and safety certiï¬cate]).
Companies should be careful not to
assume that qualifying as an AEOC
Penalties and prior disclosure
procedures—In both the EU and
the US, an importer that discloses a
customs violation to the authorities
before they have initiated an
investigation can sometimes thereby
reduce the amount of any penalty
assessed against it (though not
the amount of any duties it owes).
The UCC does not change the EU’s
framework for penalties or potential
prior disclosure procedures, which
continue to be largely determined
by the individual EU Member States.
Considerable differences will remain
between US and EU approaches
in this regard, with the additional
complexity that enforcement rules
in the EU may differ to a large extent
from one Member State to another.
So if there is a potential customs
violation, a US trader cannot approach
an EU Member State customs
authority and rely on the strategy it
follows with US Customs and Border
Protection.
While the US rules are
relatively clear-cut in this context,
there is still considerable uncertainty
in many EU Member States.
The EU and the US are currently
negotiating a Transatlantic Trade
and Investment Partnership (TTIP)
Agreement, which will contain
a chapter on customs and trade
facilitation. The overarching aims
of this chapter will be to streamline
customs rules and controls, facilitate
trade between the EU and the US
and generally make the procedures
more efï¬cient for all stakeholders.
To adopt simple and effective
bilateral rules under TTIP the EU and
,
US customs authorities will need
to continue to work together closely.
The introduction of the UCC makes
this prospect more complex, as it will
take the EU some time to get the
full UCC apparatus up and running
and ready for potential streamlining
with the US customs framework
(especially the necessary IT systems).
© Percy Feinstein/Corbis
Trade in the balance: Europe’s new Union Customs Code
11
. Global
Asia
Gregory Spak
Partner, Washington, DC
T +1 202 626 3641
E gspak@whitecase.com
Osamu Umejima
Local Partner, Tokyo
T +81 3 6384 3137
E oumejima@whitecase.com
EMEA
Samuel Scoles
Regional Director Asia—
International Trade Services, Singapore
T +65 6347 1527
E sscoles@whitecase.com
Jacquelyn MacLennan
Partner, Brussels
T +32 2 2392 563
E jmaclennan@whitecase.com
Sara Nordin
Counsel, Geneva
T +41 22 906 98 05
E snordin@whitecase.com
Americas
Dean Barclay
Counsel, Washington, DC
T +1 202 637 6255
E dean.barclay@whitecase.com
Fabienne Vermeeren
Regional Director Europe—
International Trade Services, Brussels
T +32 2 2392 606
E fvermeeren@whitecase.com
White & Case
NY0416/TL/GT/199459_12
12
. . whitecase.com
In this publication, White & Case
means the international legal practice
comprising White & Case LLP, a
New York State registered limited
liability partnership, White & Case LLP,
a limited liability partnership incorporated
under English law and all other affiliated
partnerships, companies and entities.
This publication is prepared for the
general information of our clients
and other interested persons. It is
not, and does not attempt to be,
comprehensive in nature. Due to
the general nature of its content, it
should not be regarded as legal advice.
XIV White & Case
.