1st Quarter, 2016
FixedIncomeQuarterly
MARKET PERSPECTIVES – FIXED INCOME SERVICES
“Be at war with your vices,
at peace with your
neighbors and let every
new-year find you a better
man.”
– Benjamin Franklin
Fixed Income Outlook 2016
In 2016, expect the Treasury yield curve may continue to flatten, due
in part to the Federal Reserve’s (Fed’s) “liftoff” intervention on the
very short-end, but don’t necessarily expect meaningfully higher
intermediate or long-term rates. The fixed income outlook may be a
slightly refurbished version of its 2015 prototype: “Looking ahead for
2015, don’t expect rates to rise”. That foreshadowing proved
accurate where beyond three years, there were immaterial changes
in interest rates throughout the year. Despite small intermittent
periods of volatility, the 5- to 10-year part of the curve ended
virtually unchanged for the year.
Global Forces
The bond market is now heavily influenced by global forces,
economies, unrest and wars, in addition to more traditional factors
such as domestic economic data, politics, and central bank
intervention.
All of these factors are likely to play a part in how
2016 unfolds.
It may be wise to de-emphasize the use of historic occurrences
and/or forecasting models when predicting the market’s future.
Formulas are changing. We have entered an era where worldwide
central bank intervention is at an unprecedented level. The Federal
Reserve’s balance sheet has ballooned from $880 billion in January
2008 to $4.4 trillion in November 2015.
At a time when the U.S. is
beginning to raise short-term interest rates, a wide divergence with
international monetary policy exists.
FIQ Contributors:
Doug Drabik
Sr. Fixed Income Strategist
Benjamin Streed, CFA
Fixed Income Strategist
Drew O’Neil
Fixed Income Strategist
In this Report:
ï‚· Fixed Income Outlook(pp1-3)
ï‚· Moody’s 2016 Muni and Corporate Outlook (pp4-6)
o Oil Prices Sharpen Regional Economic Differences (p4)
o State Tax Rates and Ratings (p6)
ï‚· Strategy Talk Simplified (pp7-8)
ï‚· A Deeper Dive Into Yield (p9)
ï‚· Trending News (p10)
ï‚· Corporates: Sector Analysis and Current Value (pp11-12)
o Appendix B: Example Issuers (p16)
ï‚· Plans of Action (p13)
ï‚· Additional Fixed Income Resources (p14)
ï‚· Appendix A: Individual Tax Charts (p15)
1|Page
.
FIQ 1st Quarter, 2016
Interest rate nonconformity will likely tempt large institutions
and/or sovereignties to seek the higher rates of U.S. Treasuries,
pumping up demand and tempering any quick rise in the world’s
largest and most liquid market. In addition, Europe is increasing its
quantitative easing program, and the general global policy outside
the U.S. is one of easing.
Japan is the latest country to implement
negative rates. One could argue that several Fed rate hikes would
merely dampen the U.S. easing policy and not yet be one of
tightening.
Supply
Treasury debt supply will likely be falling in 2016.
Furthermore,
supply that is issued is projected to be weighted more heavily in
bills or short-term notes. The lower supply, long bonds in particular,
would contribute to downward pressure on long-term interest
rates.
World Interest Rates
U.S.
U.K.
France
Germany
Italy
Japan
China
5-Yr
1.297%
0.889%
-0.134%
-0.312%
0.444%
-0.111%
1.126%
10-Yr
1.879%
1.541%
0.640%
0.305%
1.483%
0.073%
1.513%
source: Bloomberg 2/2/16
It’s not just rates that remain subdued; after four significant rounds
of U.S. monetary easing, economic growth remains positive yet
muted, perhaps signaling a “new norm”.
The Outlook
It certainly can be argued that the markets have been propped up
by artificial means via central bank intervention, leading to limited
investment options for those seeking income.
Many investors have
generally endorsed greater risk, pressing to achieve higher yields
while ignoring the safety and stability of traditional fixed income.
This works until it doesn’t and when it doesn’t, the fallout can be
loss of capital and wealth (e.g. year-to-date global equity decline).
What bears repeating is that although rising interest rates are
alleged to have a destructive total return impact to investment
portfolios, in reality they typically have no “realized” negative
impact on an investor’s wealth. A diversified portfolio of
investment-grade bonds is perhaps the only investment that will
provide continuous cash flow and income streams as well as return
of principal at an agreed upon point-in-time, regardless of interest
rate changes, thus being the ideal asset class to help safeguard
one’s wealth.
With all the world’s headwinds, it can be anticipated that 2016 will
present a large swing toward safety or preservation of wealth.
The
U.S. is poised to be the market of choice due to its size, liquidity and
favorable interest rates. Beyond all the economic factors, the world
is well entrenched with its war on terrorism.
Nearly every western
society and major economic power is affected. With commodity
prices falling, MLP and other limited partnerships dropping in value
and the reality of an equity pullback, there may be a considerable
argument in 2016 to forgo “potential” appreciation and lock in cash
flow and yield.
2|Page
. FIQ 1st Quarter, 2016
6%
source: Raymond James Weekly Interest Rate Monitor
Spread Products
Provide Good Yields
Prfd
5%
Muni
Corp
The Takeaway:
ï‚· Individual bonds are
perhaps the only
investment that will
provide continuous cash
flow as well as return of
principal regardless of
interest rate changes.
ï‚· Treasury rates are
publicly touted as being
low, but spread products
enjoy attractive yields.
ï‚· A most appropriate plan
of action for many
investors in 2016 will
continue to be a laddered
fixed income structure,
which levels income and
cash flow streams.
Yield
4%
3%
2%
Treasuries
1%
0%
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Strategies
A most appropriate plan of action for many investors in 2016 will
continue to be a laddered fixed income structure which generally
levels income and cash flow streams. Providing continuous and
controlled roll-off at regular intervals and may reduce risk and
provide reinvestment opportunity. In addition, as interest rates rise,
investors can take advantage of higher income/yield when
reinvesting.
Credit and duration will continue to be important bond
characteristics. Income and cash flow investors who reacted to
predictions for higher interest rates may have paid a rather large
penalty: they have unnecessarily lowered their yields and created
undesirable short reinvestment periods (often into flat or lower
interest rates).
Listen to your needs, not forecasting hype.
Being too conservative has proven to be a formidable adversary
against appropriate portfolio distribution which may capitalize on
the belly of the curve. Sixty-two percent of the curve’s slope is
captured at the 10-year; however, this does not purport that the 10year is some magical benchmark. Treasury rates are publicly touted
as being low but spread products such as corporate bonds,
preferred securities and municipal bonds enjoy attractive yields.
Many lower tier investment-grade corporate bonds provide
sufficient yield pick-up to higher investment-grade alternatives with
only a slight increase in risk.
For risk tolerant investors, the high
yield corporate space is widening out towards more normalized
levels. Supply will continue to challenge investors in 2016. This may
be particularly true with longer maturing, higher quality ‘credit safe’
municipal bonds (10 to 20 year) that provide higher tax-equivalent
yields versus most fixed income alternatives.
Overall, successful fixed income strategies rely less on market
timing and more on customization.
As with last year, the most
prominent fixed income dynamic may be the continuation of low
interest rates. â–ª
3|Page
. FIQ 1st Quarter, 2016
2016 Outlook Credit Perspective
“Gambling: The
sure way of getting
nothing from
something.”
– Wilson Mizner
Moody’s 2016 Public Finance Outlook
Government
Outlook
States
Stable
Local Governments
Stable
Water & Sewer Utilities
Stable
Not-for-Profit Healthcare
Stable
State Housing Finance Agencies
Stable
Higher Education
Community Colleges (w/Revenue Bonds)
Not-for-Profit Organizations
Independent K-12 Schools
Transportation Infrastructure, Project
Finance and Power Companies
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
US Airports
US Ports
US Toll Roads
US Public Power Utilities
Notes
State tax revenues to rise 4-5% on average. Most states continue to budget conservatively
and maintain reserves.
Property taxes expected to rise 2-3%. Growing property tax revenue and improving fund
balances demonstrate sector's stability
Debt service ratios to remain in-line with norm. Utilities' willingness and ability to raise rates
will support the sector.
Cash flow growth 3-4%.
Strong current growth in patient volumes will normalize.
Margins to remain in 13-15% range. Strong financial performance supported by increase in
short-term interest rates and spread widening between assets/liabilities.
Operating revenue to grow ~3%
Revised to stable outlook. Revenue growth 1-3%, stabilizing net tuition revenue.
Revised to stable outlook.
Operating revenue to growth ~3%.
Operating revenue to grow ~4%. Persistent demand, pricing power.
Airlines will add more seats in 2016, supporting enplanement growth. US economic growth
will support demand for US travel.
Container volume expected to rise 3-4%.
Low fuel prices and excess container capacity will
Stable
keep shipping costs low, supporting cargo growth.
Traffic growth expected to grow 3%. Low gas prices and higher toll prices will support toll
Positive
revenues.
Stable Coverage ratios to remain stable and liquidity on hand averages 215 days.
Positive
(Source: Moody’s, Raymond James)
4|Page
. FIQ 1st Quarter, 2016
Moody’s 2016 Corporate Outlook
Financials - Banking
Outlook
Asset Managers
Stable
Banking
Stable
Global Investment Banks
Stable
Notes
Transition to higher interest rate environment, rising demand. Higher costs and leverage but profitability can offset cost
stresses.
Capital and liquidity remain sound in response to regulations. Improving labor and housing market support economic
growth. Earnings could remain challenged and benefits of any rate rise will be moderate.
Capital and liquidity are strong.
Tail risks remain from legacy portfolios. Efficiency and profitability will gradually
improve. Potential rise in interest rates will alleviate net-interest margin pressures and help fixed income businesses.
Financials - Insurance
Life Insurance
Property & Casualty
Reinsurance
Commodities - Oil & Gas
Stable
Stable
Negative
Drilling & Oilfield Services
Negative
Exploration and Production
Negative
Integrated Oil & Gas
Negative
Midstream and MLPs
Stable
Refining & Marketing
Commodities - Base Metals
Utilities
US Public Power Utilities
US Regulated
Stable
Negative
US Unregulated
Industrials
Aerospace & Defense
Automotive
Global Auto Manufacturers
North American Automotive Parts
Consumer Discretionary
Apparel
Gaming
Lodging & Cruise
Restaurants
Retail
Healthcare
Stable
Stable
Negative
Positive
Stable
Stable
Stable
Stable
Positive
Stable
Positive
Global Pharmaceuticals
Positive
US Medical Products & Devices
Positive
Homebuilding
Homebuilding
Building Materials
Paper & Forest Products
Market Pulp
Paper Packaging & Tissue
Priting & Writing paper
Wood Products/Timberland
Positive
Positive
Stable
Stable
Negative
Stable
Technology, Media & Telecommunications
Broadcast
Stable
Cable
Stable
Information Technology
Stable
Newspaper & Magazines
Negative
Telecommunications
Stable
Transportation
Airlines
Positive
Global Shipping
Stable
North American Railroads
Stable
Reduced emphasis on spread-based and guaranteed products will partly offset declining investment margins.
Robust
equity markets will support income from fee-based services. Stable/declining unemployment should boost demand for
sales.
Continued growth in advanced economies. Low interest rates constrain investment income but promote underwriting
discipline.
Excess capital and weaker demand puts pressure on prices.
EBITDA down at least 20%.
Domestic activity soft, international weakening. Overcapacity and weak demand putting
pressure on both business lines.
EBITDA declines of 20-25%. Pricing uncertainty.
Cost reductions being realized. Commodity hedges rolling off adds to
cash flow pressures.
Slight recovery in EBITDA. Negative free cash flow across group.
CapEx spending cuts expected. Debt and asset sales
needed to cover negative cash flow.
EBITDA growth flat. Growth capital spending is slowing.
De-leveraging becoming more costly as equity markets face
volatility.
EBITDA to flatten. Reduced distillate demand offsets modest gasoline demand.
Expect 10-15% decline in EBITDA. Earning contraction, low prices.
China slowdown.
Steady leverage coverage. Liquidity on hand is high.
Steady cash flow to debt. Cost-recovery and expense cutting will help offset weaker demand.
Power prices are falling.
Supply/demand weak in most areas amid new capacity and stagnant growth. Coal and nuclear
plants under financial stress.
Profit up 3.5-4.5%. Large commercial aircraft deliveries to grow 4-5%.
Global defense spending to grow 2-3%.
Light vehicle sales to grow 2.5%.
Increase in light vehicle sales and EBITA growth 3-4%.
Profit to grow 3-5% but USD FX will reduce margins.
Revenue and profitability have stabilized.
Healthy EBITDA growth of 6-8%. Cruise growth through capacity expansion.
Profit expected +2-4%. Cost pressures will weigh on margins.
Low gas prices and improving labor markets should
support consumer spending.
Operating profit to remain at 5% thanks to efficiencies, sales growth expected +5%.
EBIDA growth 4-5%. Modest patent exposure. Renewal of R&D innovation.
Ongoing cost reductions and favorable US
pricing trends.
4-5% EBITDA growth. New products to help offset pricing pressure. Synergies from large-scale M&A.
Improved inpatient
trends and Medicaid expansion and ACA.
Homebuilding sector revenues to grow by >10% for 12-18mo. Margins to expand.
Operating income to grow >7% over 12-18mo. Momentum in construction continues.
Earnings to grow 1-3%.
Lower international prices.
Earnings to grow 0-4%. Packaging demand driven by economic outlook and food consumption. Tissue demand linked to
population and hygiene standards.
Earnings to decline 1-4%.
Secular paper consumption to decline 5% in mature markets.
Operating earnings to grow 0-4%. Slower than expected US home construction and weaker log/wood product exports to
China.
Core ad revenue to grow 0.5-2.5%. Strong political ad revenue.
EBITDA to grow 3-4%, broadband gains offsetting video.
Stable margins.
Revenue to grow 3%, operating profit 4%.
EBITDA down, declining demand, consolidation.
Operating income +2%. Wireless revenue 3-4% growth. Stable wireless margins but offset by wireline services.
Operating margins sustained above 10%.
Revenue per passenger to grow.
Single-digit EBITDA growth, mostly due to lower costs. Positive on tankers.
Industry revenue growth of 2.5-3.5%. Higher freight volume and strong core pricing.
Headwinds in oil, metals and
agriculture.
(Source: Moody’s, Raymond James)
5|Page
. FIQ 1st Quarter, 2016
State Tax Rates, Ratings & Relative Strength
Highest Tax Rate
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Moody's Rating
4.54%
6.90%
13.30%
4.63%
6.99%
6.60%
0.00%
6.00%
11.00%
7.40%
3.75%
3.30%
8.98%
4.60%
6.00%
6.00%
7.15%
5.75%
5.10%
4.25%
9.85%
5.00%
6.00%
6.90%
6.84%
0.00%
5.00% *
8.97%
4.90%
8.82%
5.75%
2.90%
5.00%
5.25%
9.90%
3.07%
5.99%
7.00%
0.00%
6.00% *
0.00%
5.00%
8.95%
5.75%
S&P Rating
Cities
School Districts
Counties
Aa1
Aaa
5.00%
0.00%
AA
AA+ Jan downgrade
Strong
NR
Strong
NR
Strong
Strong
Aa2 May upgrade
Aa1
Aa3
Aa1
Aa3
Aaa
Aa1
Aaa
Aa2
Aa1
Baa1 Oct downgrade
Aaa
Aaa
Aa2
Aa2
Aa2
Aa2
Aaa
Aa1
Aa1
Aa1
Aa2
Aaa
Aa1
Aa2
Aaa
Aa1
A2
Aaa
Aa1
Aaa
Aa1
Aa1
Aa2
Aa1
Aa3
Aa2
Aaa
Aa2
Aaa
Aaa
Aaa
Aaa
Aaa
AA May upgrade
AA
AA- July upgrade
AA
AA Mar negative outlook
AAA
AAA
AAA
AA
AA+
A- Dec negative outlook
AAA
AAA
AA
A+ Sept downgrade
AA Feb negative outlook
AA
AAA
AA+ Nov negative outlook
AA- July positive outlook
AA+ Aug positive outlook
AA
AAA
AA
AAA
AA
AA
A
AA+
AA+
AAA
AAA
AA+
AA+
AA+
AAAA
AA+
AAA May upgrade
AA+ Oct positive outlook
AAA
AAA
AA+
AAA
Strong
Moderate
Moderate
Strong
Strong
Strong
Strong
Very Strong
NR
Strong
Moderate
Moderate
Very Strong
Strong
Strong
Strong
Strong
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Strong
Strong
Strong
Strong
Strong
Strong
Strong
Strong
Moderate
Moderate
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Moderate
Strong
Strong
Moderate
Strong
Strong
Very Strong
Strong
Strong
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Strong
NR
Moderate
Strong
NR
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Strong
Moderate
Moderate
Strong
Strong
NR
Moderate
Weak
Moderate
Moderate
Strong
Strong
Moderate
Moderate
Strong
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
NR
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Moderate
Weak
Moderate
Strong
Strong
Strong
Strong
Strong
NR
Moderate
Strong
NR
Moderate
Strong
NR
Strong
Strong
Very Strong
Strong
Strong
Moderate
Moderate
Very Strong
Strong
Strong
Strong
Moderate
Strong
Moderate
Moderate
Strong
Very Strong
Strong
NR
Very Strong
Strong
Strong
Strong
Strong
Moderate
Very Strong
Strong
Moderate
Moderate
Strong
Strong
NR
Strong
Strong
Very Strong
Very Strong
Strong
Very Strong
NR
Washington
0.00%
Aa1
AA+
Strong
Strong
Strong
West Virginia
6.50%
Aa1
AA
Strong
NR
Strong
Wisconsin
7.65%
Aa2
AA
Moderate
Strong
Strong
Wyoming
0.00%
AAA
Strong
NR
Strong
* Interest and dividends only. All noted rating changes occurred in 2015 except Alaska.
Source: State Websites, Moody's Senior Most Tax Backed Rating, Standard & Poor's Rating Service January 7, 2016. Highest tax rates are as of date of publication
and are all subject to change.
6|Page
. FIQ 1st Quarter, 2016
Strategy Talk Simplified
For many years we’ve been bombarded with the idea that interest
rates have but one way to go… up; however, the reality is that all
those predictions have been wrong. Decisions are often made with
considerations that become discarded certainties. Numerous
recommendations have suggested either lowering duration or
completely staying out of fixed income securities, both suggestions
that have not fared well over the past several years.
Our strategy talk suggests leaving prognosticating out of the
equation. The one constant over the years is that we all are terrible
at predicting the future.
Know what you own and why you own it. A
portfolio’s allocation to fixed income preserves wealth and provides
the predictable cash flow and income to do so. Trying to achieve
this through other means doesn’t always work out.
According to a
January 2016 article appearing in the Chicago Tribune (Choe, Stan.
“Dividends on the Chopping Block as Profit Growth Peters Out”
Associated Press), about 500 companies cut or halted their
dividends last year. In addition to a board of directors determined
dividend, those companies that cut dividends usually don’t do so
because profits and growth of the company are thriving, suggesting
that the equity price may be under equal stress. Monies committed
to growth should be in growth potential assets just the same as
monies dedicated to preservation of wealth and/or income may be
better invested in individual fixed income investments.
“The journey of a thousand
miles begins with one
step.”
– Lao Tzu
Among all the reasons that fixed income protects wealth, the two
key characteristics to invoke are: the stated maturity and the
predictable cash flow and income.
When a company announces the
amount of dividends they will pay their stockholders, it is
determined only after their non-optional interest payments are
made to bond holders. The feast and/or famine payments that
make growth assets desirable for growth reasons are just different
than the more predictable wealth preservation assets. Again, know
what you own and why you own it.
Effective Maturity vs.
Stated Maturity: A stated maturity is simply
when the bond is scheduled to mature. If a bond includes a call
option and that call is likely to happen, the shorter effective
maturity will reflect when the face value is likely to be returned. In a
rising rate environment, bonds that once were “expected” to be
called and reflect a shorter effective maturity, may all of a sudden
extend out, creating a very different time line (longer) than what
may have been expected.
What to do: Consider bonds with longer or no calls to provide an
effective maturity closer to the stated maturity.
This will allow the
portfolio to generate and collect the income longer which is
desirable in a flat and/or falling interest rate environment. â–ª
7|Page
. FIQ 1st Quarter, 2016
Cash Flow vs. Income: Income is what a bond earns (the yield) and
cash flow is what money a bond is paying (the coupon). The coupon
times the face value of a bond determines the amount of cash flow
generated by a bond. In practice, some of this cash flow may
represent income and some of it may represent return of premium
paid.
Income is calculated by multiplying the yield times the
amount of an investment. Income or yield is what the bond holder
is earning.
Accuracy of Predictions?
“As the Olympic torch
neared Lake Placid, N.Y. in
1980, signaling the opening
of that year’s Winter
Olympics, newspapers and
magazines throughout the
world offered predictions
who would win medals in
the major sports.
Not a
single publication gave the
American men’s hockey
team a chance against the
world powers.”
– Don Yaeger
What to do: Always remember that yield trumps all other
characteristics. Do not sacrifice yield for other characteristics which
are usually coveted because of their beneficial features under
certain circumstances. For example, we have preached the benefits
of a high coupon bond in that it generates a greater cash flow which
in turn may be invested more quickly in a rising interest rate
environment.
The assumption is that given a choice between two
bonds with the same yield where one is a high coupon (say 5.00%)
and one is a lower coupon (say 3.00%), the higher coupon bond will
benefit the investor as interest rates rise. High coupon bonds have
afforded similar or even better yields; however, if a lower coupon
bond provides a significantly better yield, that income is realized
(actual) and not predicated on whether rates will rise. The market
has shifted and the yield-to-worst and sometimes the yield-tomaturity on many higher coupon bonds pale by comparison.
Duration Drift: Modified duration measures the price sensitivity of a
bond.
A duration of 2, in simplified terms, means that for every 1%
or 100 basis point (bp) move in interest rates, a bond holder can
expect about a 2% move in the bond’s market price. In other words,
if interest rates rise 1%, the bond price will fall about 2% for a bond
with a duration of 2. In a low interest rate environment, it may be
assumed that a high coupon bond will get called before the stated
maturity on its call date.
If interest rates rise significantly, that
assumption may go away. The bond may now “drift” to its much
longer stated maturity, increasing its duration and subjecting it to a
much greater price fluctuation.
What to do: Again, know what you own. If interest rates remain flat
and low, many of the call options will play out and the bonds will be
redeemed early.
If interest rates rise, some bonds will extend to
being redeemed on their longer stated maturity dates. Look for
bonds with more call protection or with no calls to reduce or
eliminate duration drift. â–ª
8|Page
.
FIQ 1st Quarter, 2016
A Deeper Dive Into Yield
Finding portfolio appropriate bonds encompasses a wide variety of
criteria including: maturity, duration, coupon, issuer, rating,
optionality, sector, and yield. Individual goals (purpose) and risk
tolerance are driving forces for bond suitability. There is no
“perfect” bond. For example, the bond perspective of a 50 year old
not requiring any income from a $2,000,000 portfolio is very
different than that of a 75 year old, dependent solely on income
sourced from a $500,000 fixed income portfolio.
The point is that all
bond characteristics require independent analysis for each unique
investor.
Optimizing yield is the ultimate goal, yet a more insightful way to
view this would be the goal to optimize yield given an individual’s
risk profile. Working backwards, a bond’s yield may be a very telling
piece of information in that yield reflects a bond’s worth based on
the combination of all the characteristics of maturity, duration,
coupon, issuer’s credit worthiness, etc.
Corporate Spreads Widening
Sector/AvgMat Now 1yr Ago
AA-Rated 9y
109
82
Finance 6y
92
78
Industrial 10y
113
84
Utility 14y
130
79
A-Rated 10y
142
82
Finance 7y
128
78
Industrial 11y
152
84
Utility 16y
143
79
BBB-Rated 10y
261
191
Finance 8y
194
174
Industrial 11y
312
203
Utility 13y
213
161
source: YieldBook, Raymond James as of 2/1/16
Assume there are two seemingly similar bonds with the same
coupons, similar call structures and the same maturities, yet one is
yielding 2.5% and the other 6%. Obviously there is a difference of
risk not explained by the bond structures.
The yield difference alerts
us to further inquiry.
Perhaps one of the issuers is exposed to a possible takeover or
merger. Maybe a sector is exposed to market barriers. It may be
pending litigation or overexposure to an emerging market economy
that is struggling.
There are many reasons potentially explaining
why two seemingly similar bonds with similar characteristics have
this yield divergence but that discrepancy can direct the attention
to defining the risks and determining appropriateness.
YTM
2.63%
2.16%
2.75%
2.99%
3.04%
2.70%
3.19%
3.46%
4.24%
3.41%
4.78%
3.93%
1yr
2yr
5yr
10yr
15yr
20yr
25yr
30yr
AAA Municipal G.O.
YTM
TEY
1yrAgo
0.40%
0.66%
0.23%
0.66%
1.09%
0.68%
1.00%
1.66%
1.56%
1.71%
2.83%
2.90%
2.16%
3.58%
3.58%
2.44%
4.04%
3.94%
2.69%
4.45%
4.12%
2.75%
4.55%
4.21%
taxable equivalent yield based on 39.6% bracket
source: Bloomberg, MMD, Raymond James 2/1/16
By defining risk and evaluating whether that risk is acceptable, an
investor can optimize their return (yield). Although Treasury yields
are flat to falling, most buy-and-hold investors purchase spread
product such as corporate bonds, municipal bonds, CDs, preferred
securities and agency bonds. Spreads are widening meaning the
yields on spread products are holding despite the general Treasury
yield decline.
â–ª
9|Page
. FIQ 1st Quarter, 2016
“Never make predictions,
especially about the
future.”
– Casey Stengel
Muni Default Rates
IG Moody's Rated Issuers
1-Yr
5-Yr Issuers
General Obligation
8,600
AAA
0.00% 0.00%
AA
0.00% 0.00%
A
0.00% 0.01%
Baa
0.01% 0.03%
Non-GO
8,400
AAA
0.00% 0.00%
AA
0.00% 0.01%
A
0.01% 0.06%
Baa
0.02% 0.29%
source: Moody's Data Report July 2015
Corporate Default Rates
Investment-Grade Default Rate
1-Yr
5-Yr Issuers
Global
0.06% 0.90%
8,857
N. America
0.00% 0.07%
4,146
Europe
0.00% 2.38%
2,517
Asia-Pacific
0.00% 0.00%
1,165
Industrials
0.00% 0.00%
4,122
Finance
0.00% 1.85%
3,038
1,691
Utilities, Sov 0.21% 0.25%
& Project Fin
source: Moody's Data Report January, 2016
Trending News:
Public Finance
ï‚· S&P’s 3rd quarter 2015 marked the 12th straight quarter of
more upgrades versus downgrades. (S&P)
o Stronger finances reason in 198 of 285 upgrades.
o Deteriorating finances and liquidity main reasons
for downgrades.
o California led way with 90 upgrades.
ï‚· Seven rated bond issues defaulted. (S&P)
o Puerto Rico Public Finance Corporation defaulted
on 4 series (August).
o Dowling College, Charter School of Boynton Beach
and Stockton Redevelopment Agency, CA each
defaulted.
rd
ï‚· S&P 3 quarter upgrade/downgrade: Local governments
159 upgrades/50 downgrades; Utilities 29 upgrades/21
downgrades; Not-for-profit health care 18 upgrades/4
downgrades;
Higher
education
10
upgrades/18
downgrades; Charter schools 2 upgrades/5 downgrades;
Transportation 11 upgrades/2 downgrades.
ï‚· States upgraded 2015: Arizona (Aa2/AA, Moody’s/S&P);
California (AA-, S&P); South Dakota (AAA, S&P).
ï‚· States downgraded 2015: Illinois (Baa1, Moody’s); Kentucky
(A+, S&P); Alaska (AA+, S&P/2016).
ï‚· Federal budget (2016) maintains Public Housing Capital
Fund appropriation at $1.9 billion (4th consecutive year).
Protects revenue stream of Public Housing Authorities
(PHAs).
Historically, capital funding for public housing is
vulnerable to appropriation cuts. Levels cut 8 times from
2001-2013. It stabilized in 2013 and has remained flat.
This
has been credit positive. (source: Moody’s)
Corporate
ï‚· Moody’s placed 175 energy and mining companies on
review for possible downgrade (January 21).
ï‚· Moody’s lowered their forward price projections across the
commodities spectrum. The range of possible outcomes
upon conclusion of the review for given issuers varies from
possible confirmation of ratings to multi-notch downgrades.
ï‚· North American one-year investment-grade corporate
default rate = 0.00%.
Five-year = 0.07% (source: Moody’s)
ï‚· North American one-year [Caa-C] default rate = 4.90%. The
five-year default rate [Caa-C] = 23.26%. (source: Moody’s) â–ª
10 | P a g e
.
FIQ 1st Quarter, 2016
Corporates: Sector Analysis and Current Value
Treasuries are flat, corporate yields are UP! The Fed “liftoff” in
December did help the shortest part of the yield curve move higher,
but the longer-end has a mind of its own. One of the most popular
benchmarks, the 10-year Treasury yield1 is down by 61bp since
October 2014 when we first ran this scan and YTD is down ~41bp.
Market pundits and financial journalism will focus on the Treasury
market as a proxy for yields, but this is only one side of the story.
For those looking for higher yields, look no further than the
corporate bond market; yield spreads have increased considerably
helping to offset stubborn Treasury yields. As proof, the Citi Broad
Investment Grade Credit Index (Citi BIGC) has a current spread of
+195bp, the highest level in the post-recession and postQuantitative Easing (QE) era2. This is up from the +140bp level seen
this time last year and well above the +120bp seen in late 2014.
10-year Treasury Yield (red) and Citi BIGC Spreads (blue)
(Source: YieldBook, Raymond James)
As noted in the chart above, nearly any way you look at it, the 10y
Treasury yield (red line) is roughly flat while credit spreads are up
dramatically.
Remember the premise: Treasury + spread = corporate
yield. Therefore, yields in corporate credit are actually up. Putting it
all together; Treasury yields are flat or slightly down, but spreads
are wider (higher) meaning corporate bond yields are higher in
2016.
Next, we examine which specific industries offer the most
compelling opportunities in the corporate sector.
The Citi BIGC
Index is comprised of three broad industries: industrials, utilities
and finance, which are comprised of 45 smaller and more specific
sectors.
GOOD NEWS!
This section will now be
updated each quarter!
A refresher on spreads:
Within fixed income, spread
is the comparison between
two bonds where one bond
is the base rate or index.
Often, Treasuries are the
base rate of comparison. If
the 10â€year Treasury yield is
2.00% and a comparison
10-year corporate bond is
trading with a spread of 150
basis points (150bp), it
means the corporate bond
is trading with a yield of
3.50% (2.00% Treasury yield
+ 150bp (spread) = 3.50%
corporate yield).
“I figure lots of predictions
is best. People forget the
ones I get wrong and
marvel over the rest.”
– Alan Cox
(continued on next page)
1
As of 2/5/16.
The 10-year Treasury was chosen as a comparable benchmark as it bests
matches the 10.5 year average maturity of the BIG Credit Index.
2
This is the highest sustained level since the Sep-Dec 2011 period.
11 | P a g e
. FIQ 1st Quarter, 2016
The chart below details those sectors that currently provide yield
spreads above the 195bp offered by the broad index (the dotted
blue line). For comparison, the year-over-year average index spread
is 140bp. Each sector is represented by a grey box (middle 50% of
observations) as well as two “whiskers” representing the high and
low spreads seen over the last year. The green and red markers are
the current and average yield spread respectively.
What does the
chart show us? Each of the highlighted sectors currently has yield
spreads (green dot) above its own multi-year average (red dot),
many substantially so. For those investors seeking yield and where it
is appropriate, these sectors offer yields well above their
investment grade peers. Keep in mind, additional spread may
indicate additional risk.
“Price is what you pay.
Value is what you get.”
– Warren Buffet
The Takeaway: Treasuries
provide a base rate but
spread products, such as
corporate bonds, provide a
considerable yield pick-up
to Treasury rates.
The Basis and Spreads associated with this graph are explained in the paragraphs
above.
Larger view available on page 16. (Source: YieldBook, Raymond James)
So what is the highlight from the chart? Sectors including: building
products, chemicals (new to the list), metals/mining, paper/forest
products,
manufacturing,
gas-pipelines,
energy-machinery,
cable/media, utilities and telecomm all have spreads higher than
the index average and provide outsized yields for those willing/able
to assume additional risk/volatility.
We continue to live in a world where it remains uncertain as to
when, or if, rates will rise significantly in the near future. Searching
for higher yields now? Consider investing in those areas in the
investment grade market that are exhibiting wider than normal
spreads.
Pair this additional spread with the recent rise in Treasury
yields, and they pack a powerful one-two-punch resulting in the
highest investment grade yields in several years. A larger view of
this chart, along with a list of industries/sectors and issuers can be
found in Appendix B on page 14. â–ª
12 | P a g e
.
FIQ 1st Quarter, 2016
Plans of Action
Know What You Own: Fixed income securities have provided one of
the better total returns over the past couple of years; however,
don’t be sucked into believing this is their primary purpose.
Equities, for example, will always carry a much higher potential for
price growth and thus greater total return than fixed income
securities. Unfortunately, recent history is demonstrating that with
greater upward potential also comes greater potential for principal
loss. Fixed income securities provide a known cash flow and income
stream with a stated maturity and return of face value. This is their
strength just as growth is equity’s strength.
Don’t try to substitute
one for the other based on a brief moment in time. Think long-term
when investing.
Spread Products Are Delivering: We are at historically low Treasury
interest rate levels. It is hard to be excited about 2.00% yields.
This
is not always about growing wealth but sometimes about not losing
wealth. Spreads have widened on many products, so although
Treasury yields seem dismal, corporate bonds, municipal bonds, CDs
on the short-end and preferred securities are offering reliable
income at levels well above Treasury rates in a market with minimal
negative inflation effect.
“If you do not change
direction, you may end up
where you are heading.”
– Gautama Buddha
Laddered Portfolios: Simply put, rate predicting is speculating.
Don’t speculate with the portion of your portfolio which is the
foundation of your wealth and retirement. Investing in securities
which are going to protect if ‘xyz’ occurs may prove harmful to
one’s wealth.
Invest the foundation portfolio dollars based on
today, not what you think might happen tomorrow. A laddered
portfolio may prevent the need for forward projection, possibly
provide a higher return and allow continual portfolio roll-off to be
reinvested under whatever changing interest rate environment
occurs.
Don’t Stuff Your Money Under the Mattress: We don’t want to
guess interest rates but we need to recognize our surroundings.
Examine the current environment: All economic powers, with the
exception of the U.S., are currently easing monetary policy. The
dollar continues to stay strong, thus impeding corporate profits.
Inflation remains a “non-factor”.
Growth in China, the largest
commodity consumer, is completely in a downward spiral.
Commodity demand is low and therefore prices and commodity
companies are getting pummeled. Oil continues to be weak.
Equities are already down 7% on the year. Is there any reason to
believe interest rates will be significantly higher in the foreseeable
future? Of course we don’t know.
We do know that sitting on the
sideline will provide no return. Stay invested, stay the course.
Despite the contrary proclamation, duration has actually been an
investor’s friend over the past several years. â–ª
13 | P a g e
.
FIQ 1st Quarter, 2016
Additional Fixed Income and Strategy Resources
Doug Drabik - Sr. Fixed Income Strategist
Benjamin Streed, CFA - Fixed Income Strategist
Drew O’Neil - Fixed Income Strategist
The Fixed Income Strategy Group provides market commentary,
portfolio analysis and strategy to Raymond James advisors for the
benefit of their clients. We are part of the larger 13 person Fixed
Income Services Group (FISG).
RaymondJames.com is a vast resource for those seeking fixed
income market commentaries, strategies, education materials and
index/yield data. Please visit our public webpage at
http://raymondjames.com/fixin.htm for popular resources which
include:
“Every client with the
means to properly diversify,
can have a customized bond
portfolio that will perform
as intended regardless of
interest rate moves.
“
ï‚·
ï‚·
ï‚·
ï‚·
ï‚·
ï‚·
Bond Market Update
Fixed Income Market Commentary by Kevin Giddis
Weekly Interest Rate Monitor
Fixed Income Weekly Primer
Taxable Fixed Income Chartbook
Weekly Index Monitor
- FISG of Raymond James
Investments we cover:
ï‚· Treasuries/Agencies
ï‚· Brokered CDs
ï‚· Corporate bonds
ï‚· MBS/CMOs
ï‚· Tax-exempt municipals
bonds
ï‚· Taxable municipal
bonds
ï‚· Preferred securities
14 | P a g e
. FIQ 1st Quarter, 2016
Appendix A
10%
15%
25%
28%
33%
35%
39.60%
2015 Federal Tax Rates
Single
Married Joint
Less than 9,225
Less than 18,450
9,225 - 37,450
18,450 - 74,900
37,450 - 90,750
74,900 - 151,200
90,750 - 189,300
151,200 - 230,450
189,300 - 411,500
230,450 - 411,500
411,500 - 413,200
411,500 - 464,850
More than 413,200
More than 464,850
Head of Household
Less than 13,150
13,150 - 50,200
50,200 - 129,600
129,600 - 209,850
209,850 - 411,500
411,500 - 439,000
More than 439,000
Capital Gains Tax Rates
Maximum Effective Maximum
Rate
Rate with 3.8% Surtax
Holding Period
Assets Held One Year or Less
39.6%
43.4%*
Assets Held More Than One Year and Sold by
Individuals in the 39.6% Tax Bracket or Above
20.0%
23.8%*
Assets Held More Than One Year and Sold by
Individuals in the 25% to 35% Tax Brackets
15.0%
18.8%**
Assets Held More than One Year and Sold by
Individuals in the 15% Bracket or Below
0.0%
0.00%
* The a ddi tiona l 3.8% Medi ca re s urtax wi l l a ppl y to thes e taxpa yers .
** The a ddi tiona l 3.8% Medi ca re s urtax ma y a ppl y to thes e taxpa yers .
Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT)
AMT Exemption
AMT Exemption
Filing Status
2015
Threshold 2015
Married Filing Jointly and
$83,400
$158,900
Surviving Spouses
Single or Head of
Household
$53,600
$119,200
Married Filing Separately
$41,700
$79,450
Annual Gift Tax Exclusion: $14,000
Estate Tax Exclusion: $5,430,000
Source: Raymond James: “2015 Tax and Financial Planning Flier”
Consult your professional tax advisor for questions relating to your individual situation.
15 | P a g e
. FIQ 1st Quarter, 2016
Appendix B (refer to page 11-12 for corresponding article):
Sector/Subgroup
Industry
Building Products
Example Issuers
Carlisle, CRH, Mohawk Industries, Stanley Black & Decker
Chemicals
Manf.
CF Industries, Cabot, Dow Chemical, DuPont, Eastman Chemical, Monsanto, Mosaic, SherwinWilliams
Metals/Mining
Barrick Gold, BHP Billiton, Freeport-McMoran, Goldcorp, Newmont Mining, Rio Tinto, Southern
Copper, Teck Resources, Vale
Paper/Forest Products Domtar, Georgia-Pacific, International Paper, Packaging Corp of America, Weyerhaeuser
Other Manufacturing
Industrials
Eaton, Ford Motor, Johnson Controls, MeadWestvaco, NVR, Rock-Tenn, Sonoco Products, Whirlpool
Integrated
BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Exxon Mobil, Statoil
Pipelines
Kinder Morgan, Oneok, Plains All American, Sunoco Logistics, Williams Partners
Energy
Exploration/Production Continental Resources, Noble Energy, Murphy Oil, Canadian Natural Resources
Services/Equipment
Cable/Media
Service
Gaming/Lodging
Utility - Power
Utilities
Cameron International, Ensco, Nabors, Noble(NE), Weatherford
CBS, Comcast, Cox Communications, Discovery Communications, NBC Universal, Time Warner Cable,
Viacom, Walt Disney Co.
Carnival Corp, Host Hotels, Hyatt, Marriott, Starwood Hotels, Wyndham
Dominion, Entergy, Exelon Generation, Southern Power
Utility
Telecomm
AT&T, Nippon, Qwest, Verizon, Vodafone
source: Raymond James
The Basis and Spreads associated with this graph are explained in the paragraphs on page 11-12.
(Source: YieldBook, Raymond James)
16 | P a g e
. FIQ 1st Quarter, 2016
The author of this material is a Trader in the Fixed Income Department of Raymond James & Associates (RJA), and is not an
Analyst.
Any opinions expressed may differ from opinions expressed by other departments of RJA, including our Equity Research
Department, and are subject to change without notice. The data and information contained herein was obtained from
sources considered to be reliable, but RJA does not guarantee its accuracy and/or completeness. Neither the information
nor any opinions expressed constitute a solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security referred to herein. This material
may include analysis of sectors, securities and/or derivatives that RJA may have positions, long or short, held proprietarily.
RJA or its affiliates may execute transactions which may not be consistent with the report’s conclusions.
RJA may also have
performed investment banking services for the issuers of such securities. Investors should discuss the risks inherent in
bonds with their Raymond James Financial Advisor. Risks include, but are not limited to, changes in interest rates, liquidity,
credit quality, volatility, and duration.
Past performance is no assurance of future results.
This communication is intended to improve the efficiency with which Financial Advisors obtain information relevant to
their client's fixed income holdings. This information should not be construed as a directive from the RJ&A Fixed Income
Department to buy or sell the securities noted above. Prior to transacting in any security, please discuss the suitability,
potential returns, and associated risks of the transactions(s) with your Raymond James Financial Advisor.
Investing involves risk and you may incur a profit or a loss.
The value of fixed income securities fluctuates and investors
may receive more or less than their original investments if sold prior to maturity. Bonds are subject to price change and
availability. Investments in debt securities involve a variety of risks, including credit risk, interest rate risk, and liquidity
risk.
Investments in debt securities rated below investment grade (commonly referred to as “junk bonds”) may be subject
to greater levels of credit and liquidity risk than investments in investment grade securities. Investors who own fixed
income securities should be aware of the relationship between interest rates and the price of those securities. As a
general rule, the price of a bond moves inversely to changes in interest rates.
Diversification does not ensure a profit or
protect against a loss.
The information contained herein has been prepared from sources believed reliable but is not guaranteed by Raymond
James & Associates, Inc. (RJA) and is not a complete summary or statement of all available data, nor is it to be construed as
an offer to buy or sell any securities referred to herein. Trading ideas expressed are subject to change without notice and
do not take into account the particular investment objectives, financial situation or needs of individual investors.
Investors
are urged to obtain and review the relevant documents in their entirety. RJA is providing this communication on the
condition that it will not form the primary basis for any investment decision you may make. Furthermore, because these
are only trade ideas, investors should assume that RJA will not produce any follow-up.
Employees of RJA or its affiliates
may, at times, release written or oral commentary, technical analysis or trading strategies that differ from the opinions
expressed within. RJA and/or its employees involved in the preparation or the issuance of this communication may have
positions in the securities discussed herein. Securities identified herein are subject to availability and changes in price.
All
prices and/or yields are indications for informational purposes only. Additional information is available upon request.
Raymond James & Associates, Inc., member New York Stock Exchange/SIPC. Raymond James Financial Services, Inc.,
member FINRA/SIPC
Ref.
2016-006939 until 02/08/2017
© 2016 Raymond James & Associates, Inc., member New York Stock Exchange/SIPC
© 2016 Raymond James Financial Services, Inc., member FINRA/SIPC
Raymond James Corporate Headquarters â— 880 Carillon Parkway, St. Petersburg, FL 33716
17 | P a g e
.