Establishing a Growth Engine through
Marketing and Business Development
The 2014 Fidelity RIA Benchmarking Study reveals key lessons from
RIAs who are strong in marketing and business development
Many RIAs struggle when it comes to marketing and business
development. The 2014 Fidelity RIA Benchmarking Study
reported that only 5% of participating firms felt their capabilities
in this area were advanced, and only 30% felt they were fairly
strong. So, what can we learn from firms that seem to have
figured out how to develop and harness these capabilities?
What are they doing differently from Others?
This report takes a close look at the activities of “Marketing
Leaders”— the 35% of firms that believe that their marketing
and business development capabilities are fairly strong or
advanced, and have been able to register better numbers
than other participants of the Study when it comes to growth
of clients, assets, and revenues.
Insights gleaned from the activities of Marketing Leaders
may help RIAs enhance these important business-building
capabilities to help put their firm on a new growth trajectory.
Inside:
Checklist
For an Advice 2.0 Model
I. Introduction
Be laser focused on your strategy
2
II. Lessons from Marketing Leaders
Put the investor at the epicenter
(1) Prioritize growth
3
4
(2) Plan effectively
Transform your advisors
(3) Ingrain your firm story
(4)
Generate new business
Crack the product code
opportunity through
operational discipline
Drive operational excellence
(5) Maximize your marketing mix
III. Actions to Consider
3
5
6
8
10
. Definition of terms in this report
Section I: Introduction
The 2014 Fidelity RIA Benchmarking
Study took a close look at the
marketing and business development
activities of participating RIAs and
found that many firms have room
for improvement. The Study also
examined High-Performing Firms1 that
outperformed All Other Eligible Firms
on a number of core financial metrics,
to understand what they are doing
differently.2 This revealed a number of
marketing and business development
best practices worth noting. Now we
turn to Marketing Leaders that have
specific skills in marketing and business
development, to uncover additional
insights that may help RIAs improve
their own processes and capabilities.
• “Study” refers to The 2014 Fidelity RIA Benchmarking Study.
• he terms “RIA,” “RIA firms,” and “firms” refer only to those RIA firms that
T
participated in the Study.
• he term “Marketing Leaders” refers to the 35% of RIA firms that rated
T
their marketing and business development capabilities as fairly strong
or advanced.
• he terms “Other RIAs” and “Others” refer to participating firms in the
T
Study that are not considered Marketing Leaders for the purposes of
this report.
About the research and respondents
The Fidelity RIA Benchmarking program seeks to provide RIAs with insights into
how their firms compare with others in the industry, so they can identify areas of
opportunity, set goals, and work toward improving their business performance.
The 2014 Study focused on marketing and business development. Respondents
were primarily RIAs that custody some portion of their assets with Fidelity
Investments (“Fidelity”).3 The online survey was conducted from May 6 through
June 30, 2014, and was administered by an independent third-party research firm
not affiliated with Fidelity.
Fidelity was identified as the Study sponsor. More than
600 firms participated in the survey, of which 411 completed it, forming the basis
for the findings of this report.
Skills in marketing and business
development appear to contribute to
stronger growth (see Figure 1). From
2010 to 2013, Marketing Leaders
outperformed Other RIAs in terms
of growth of clients, assets, and
revenue.
Since these firms are twice
as large (with a median of 10 full-time
equivalents versus five for Other RIAs),
these growth rates are typically off
of a higher base, making them even
more impressive.
All statistics in this report are from The 2014 Fidelity RIA Benchmarking Study.
Figure 1: Compound annual growth rates*
METRICS:
MARKETING LEADERS
OTHER RIAS
CLIENTS
9.5%
6.8%
ASSETS
16.5%
13.4%
REVENUE
15.9%
13.3%
35%
of RIAs in the Study are Marketing
Leaders with advanced/fairly
strong marketing and business
development capabilities
* rom 2010 to 2013.
F
The term “High-Performing Firms” refers to the subset of participating firms in this Study with business results that meet the criteria defined in the Fidelity white
paper “Firing on All Cylinders: Fueling Growth with Benchmarking Insights.” Reference to the concept of “performing” in the name of this group is not intended to
connote investment returns. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.
2
Refer to the Fidelity white paper “Firing on All Cylinders: Fueling Growth with Benchmarking Insights” for more insights on High-Performing Firms, and the
definition of All Other Eligible Firms.
3
C
learing and custody provided by National Financial Services LLC, an affiliate of Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC.
1
2
. Section II: Lessons from
Marketing Leaders
In the Study, RIAs rated their own
marketing and business development
capabilities. Since Marketing Leaders
categorized themselves as being
proficient in these areas, we took
a closer look at actual behaviors
to see if their actions aligned with
their response. We found that
Marketing Leaders do, in fact, excel
in five important areas. They: (1)
prioritize growth, (2) plan effectively,
(3) ingrain their firm story, (4)
generate new business through
operational discipline, and (5)
maximize their marketing mix.
This
report delves into each of these areas
to draw out key insights.
1
Prioritize growth
Growth is even more important for
Marketing Leaders than for Other
RIAs, which has implications for the
strength required of their marketing
and business development capabilities.
While close to half (49%) of Other
RIAs say a lack of focus on growth is
a key barrier to optimizing marketing
and business development, only 31%
of Marketing Leaders state this as
a concern.
Marketing Leaders typically spend
about 2.4% of their revenue on
marketing and business development,
while Other RIAs spend about 1.8%
(a 33% difference). More Marketing
61% versus 43%
Percentage of Marketing Leaders
that say growth is extremely important
versus Other RIAs
Figure 2: Top marketing and business development initiatives
Percentage of firms currently devoting resources
64%
Marketing
Leaders
61%
54%
44%
40%
Other RIAs
51%
39%
39%
41%
40%
20%
Work on
marketing
plans
Improve
the sales
process
Work
on COI
strategies
Leaders also plan to keep consistently
growing this expenditure over the next
five years, which may imply a longerterm focus.
In addition, Marketing Leaders devote
more resources than Others to a variety
of initiatives that can help positively
impact their firm’s growth
(see Figure 2). These include working
on a marketing plan and a strategy for
centers of influence (COIs), and taking
time to improve the sales process.
Most firms in the Study say organic
growth is more of a focus than
inorganic growth, including Marketing
Leaders.
Relative to their peers,
however, Marketing Leaders are
more interested in inorganic growth,
especially acquisitions. Over the last
three years, Marketing Leaders were
more likely to have at least considered
an acquisition or tuck-in, while they
were less likely to have considered
selling or merging compared to Other
RIAs. Looking forward, this difference
in focus will become even more
pronounced (see Figure 3).
20%
Improve
Align
Work on
client referral compensation PR strategy
strategies with business
development
goals
Figure 3: M&A strategies over next
five years*
Percentage
of firms
Considering:
Marketing
Leaders
Other
RIAs
Acquiring
73%
62%
Merging
28%
46%
Selling
8%
20%
* rom 2014 to 2018.
F
39% versus 28%
Percentage of Marketing Leaders
that plan to consistently grow
their marketing and business
development spend over the next
five years versus Other RIAs
3
.
2
Plan effectively
Planning and execution can be just as
important to the success of marketing
and business development activities as
they are for realizing a firm’s long-term
strategic vision. Marketing Leaders
outpace Other RIAs by a wide margin
when it comes to creating, executing,
and monitoring a plan.
Far more Marketing Leaders have a
written marketing plan than Other RIAs,
and the majority of this group (88%)
say they update the plan semiannually
or annually. They also say they are
more satisfied with the plan’s quality,
effectiveness, and execution.
Marketing Leaders appreciate the
importance of having plans with clear
goals and assigning responsibility for
different tasks to help ensure things
get done, specifying both ownership
and deadlines.
49% versus 21%
Percentage of Marketing Leaders
with a written marketing
plan versus Other RIAs
45% versus 7%
Of firms with plans, percentage
of Marketing Leaders very satisfied
with the effectiveness of their
plan versus Other RIAs*
37% versus 10%
Percentage of Marketing
Leaders that are extremely/very
proficient in measuring marketing
and business development
success versus Other RIAs
70% versus 52%
Percentage of Marketing
Leaders that use actual results
to drive compensation for the
firm’s business development
professionals versus Other RIAs
Marketing Leaders recognize the
need to monitor their progress and
are more likely than Other RIAs to
say they are proficient in measuring
the success of their marketing and
business development activities. The
metrics used to monitor progress—
such as growth in firm clients, assets,
and revenues—are similar across
RIAs, suggesting that the difference
in proficiency may come down to
Marketing Leaders being more
disciplined in how these indicators are
tracked and used.
Additionally, Marketing Leaders are
more likely than Other RIAs to track the
progress that is being made by looking
at a number of factors—from pipeline
reports to the closing ratio of new
prospects (see Figure 4).
They are also
much more likely to be using customer
relationship management (CRM)
systems for this, rather than tracking
activities manually.
87% versus 67%
Percentage of Marketing
Leaders with marketing plans
that have goals and assigned
ownership versus Other RIAs
78% versus 61%
Percentage of Marketing Leaders that
assign specific deadlines to their
marketing plans versus Other RIAs
Figure 4: Performance tracking metrics and tools
Percentage of firms tracking:
Marketing Leaders
Other RIAs
Pipeline reports
71%
53%
Prospects not retained
64%
45%
Prospects not referred
56%
41%
Closing ratio
49%
32%
* ercentage of firms that selected a 6 or a 7 on a scale from 1 to 7, where 1 = Not at All Satisfied and 7 = Extremely Satisfied
P
4
. 3
Ingrain your firm story
As both headcount and assets in the
RIA space continue to grow at a fast
pace,4 so too does competition. This
underscores the need for all RIAs to
have a compelling and differentiated
story that describes their business
model and unique attributes, and the
benefits that investors can expect
from working with the firm. Across the
board, Marketing Leaders have been
doing a better job on this front than
Other RIAs.
Close to three-quarters of Marketing
Leaders agree that they have created a
clearly defined firm story that explains
what differentiates them from other
firms, while less than half of Other RIAs
have done so. Importantly, a larger
percentage of Marketing Leaders have
also specifically tailored this story
to the needs of their target clients,
thereby potentially improving the
chances that their particular story will
resonate with the clients they most
want to reach.
More Marketing Leaders also agree
that their firm’s story is consistently
reflected in all their marketing
materials, helping to both reinforce the
message and create a strong image
in the minds of clients, prospects,
and COIs.
73% versus 47%
They also agree that the fundamentals
of their firm story are known to the
majority of their clients and key COIs,
helping these potential advocates
spread the word about what the firm
does (see Figure 5).
58% versus 36%
As both headcount and assets
in the RIA space continue
to grow at a fast pace,4 so
too does competition.
This
underscores the need for all
RIAS to have a compelling and
differentiated story...
Percentage of Marketing Leaders
that have created a clearly defined
firm story versus Other RIAs*
Percentage of Marketing Leaders that
have a firm story that is specifically
tailored to the needs of their target
client profile versus Other RIAs*
58% versus 41%
Percentage of Marketing
Leaders that strongly agree that
their firm story is consistently
reflected in all their marketing
materials versus Other RIAs*
Figure 5: Awareness of firm story fundamentals*
Percentage of firms who say their
Marketing Leaders
51%
Other RIAs
46%
36%
Clients know the
fundamentals of the firm’s story
33%
Key COIs know the
fundamentals of the firm’s story
* ercentage of firms that selected a 6 or a 7 on a scale of 1 to 7, where 1 = Strongly Disagree and 7 = Strongly Agree.
P
4
“RIA Marketplace 2013, The Changing Landscape of a Maturing Industry,” The Cerulli Report, 2013.
5
.
4 Generate new business opportunity
Figure 6: Steps to obtain client referrals*
through operational discipline
Our Study shows that approximately
75% of an advisor’s new clients come
from referrals made by current clients
or COIs, underscoring the importance
of having strong relationships to help
encourage these introductions. While
there is room for improvement among
most RIAs when it comes to being
proactive to build a flow of referrals,
Marketing Leaders have taken more
steps than Other RIAs on this front.
46% versus 22%
Percentage of Marketing Leaders
with client referral processes
that are advanced or fairly
strong versus Other RIAs
43% versus 15%
Percentage of Marketing Leaders
with COI referral processes
that are advanced or fairly
strong versus Other RIAs
Marketing Leaders are far more likely
than Other RIAs to rate their client and
COI referral processes as advanced
or fairly strong. With respect to client
referrals, Marketing Leaders are three
times more likely than Other RIAs to
say they have a clear plan for proactive
outreach. In addition, they find a range
of activities effective to encourage
client referrals, including specific
events, discussions, and targeted
communications (see Figure 6).
Percentage of firms that Rated
each activity as effective:
Marketing Leaders
Other RIAs
Conduct referral-focused events
37%
19%
Discuss referrals in client meetings
32%
18%
Send referral-oriented communications
18%
8%
* ercentage of firms that selected a 6 or a 7 on a scale of 1 to 7, where 1 = Not Effective
P
and 7 = Highly Effective.
Why are Marketing Leaders more likely
to find these activities effective? We
believe their progress is tied to key
practices discussed throughout this
report, including having a clear plan,
telling a compelling firm story that is
tailored to target client needs, and
communicating target client profiles
to referral sources.
Consistently
doing these things should lead to
a higher level of effectiveness with
events, client referral conversations,
and communications.
Marketing Leaders are also more
diligent when it comes to nurturing
COIs. Twice as many agree that they
research and identify key COIs to work
with, helping to zero in on the best
candidates, and three times as many
agree that they have a clear plan for
proactive outreach.
Marketing Leaders also recognize that
referrals are a two-way street. About
one in three tries to understand the
target clients of their COIs, while only
about one in six Other RIAs do so.
Marketing Leaders are also more likely
to communicate their firm’s target
client profile to COIs and follow up to
stay engaged.
* ercentage of firms that selected a 6 or a 7 on a scale of 1 to 7, where 1 = Strongly Disagree and 7 = Strongly Agree.
P
6
30% versus 15%
Percentage of Marketing Leaders
that take the time to identify key
COIs versus Other RIAs*
23% versus 7%
Percentage of Marketing Leaders
that have a clear plan
for proactive outreach to COIs*
32% versus 11%
Percentage of Marketing Leaders that
effectively communicate their firm’s
target client profile to clients
and COIs versus Other RIAs*
.
More than half of Marketing Leaders
see referring clients to COIs as an
effective way to get leads back in
return. Giving updates on referrals that
are provided and discussing them in
COI meetings are also seen as effective
tactics (see Figure 7).
In addition to having strong
relationships with clients and COIs,
it is critical to have strong talent and
incentive systems in place to help
bring new business to the firm. More
Marketing Leaders agree that their
business development professionals
have the right skills and training to
succeed than Other RIAs.
Marketing Leaders are also more likely
to agree that they meet regularly
to discuss business development
issues, create clear client acquisition
goals, track progress using their
CRM systems, and proactively share
win-loss analysis across the firm (see
Figure 8). Marketing Leaders also
are more likely to use actual results
to drive compensation for people
in the firm who are involved with
business development.
Figure 7: Steps to obtain COI referrals*
Percentage of firms that Rated
each activity as effective:
Other RIAs
Refer clients to COIs
52%
29%
Give updates on referrals provided
41%
28%
Discuss referrals in COI meetings
39%
19%
Conduct referral-focused events
29%
12%
* ercentage of firms that selected a 6 or a 7 on a scale from 1 to 7, where 1 = Not Effective
P
and 7 = Highly Effective.
Figure 8: Steps to help drive new business*
Percentage of firms that:
Marketing Leaders
Other RIAs
Use actual results to drive
compensation for the firm’s
business development professionals†
70%
52%
Meet regularly to discuss business
development goals, progress, and
recent developments
49%
23%
Have clear client acquisition goals
35%
9%
Use CRM to track leads
and follow up
35%
18%
Proactively share win-loss analysis
across the firm
59% versus 24%
Percentage of Marketing Leaders
who say their business development
professionals have the right skills
and training to succeed versus
Other RIAs*
Marketing Leaders
33%
13%
* ercentage of firms that selected a 6 or a 7 on a scale from 1 to 7, where 1 = Strongly Disagree and
P
7 = Strongly Agree.
N
o scale used.
†
* ercentage of firms that selected a 6 or a 7 on a scale of 1 to 7, where 1 = Strongly Disagree and 7 = Strongly Agree.
P
7
.
5 Maximize your marketing mix
Explanation of terms
There are many different activities that
firms can use to reach out to clients,
prospects, and COIs to tell their story.
From communications to PR, Marketing
Leaders are putting more time and
money into their marketing activities
than Other RIAs.
• Communications (e.g., newsletters, direct mail campaigns)
• Collateral (e.g., brochures, pitch books)
• Events (e.g., client appreciation, educational, referral)
• igital marketing and advertising — excluding social media (e.g., online
D
ads, Web site, email, blogs)
The top three activities used by both
groups are communications, collateral,
and events, but a difference can be
seen in the depth of usage, with 58%
of Marketing Leaders using all three,
compared to 40% of Other RIAs.
Marketing Leaders are also heavier
users of social media,5 traditional
advertising, and PR, with the biggest
difference from Other RIAs being the
use of PR (see Figure 9).
• Social media (e.g., Twitter ®, Facebook®, LinkedIn®, Pinterest ®, Google+®)
• Traditional advertising (e.g., signage, print, radio, TV, sponsorships)
• R (e.g., radio or TV appearances, news releases, bylines)
P
Figure 9: Use of marketing activities
Other RIAs
Marketing Leaders
Percentage of firms that use
100%
75%
78%
75%
78%
77%
69%
65%
56%
50%
57%
50%
46%
40%
39%
32%
25%
20%
0%
Communications
5
Collateral
Events
Digital marketing
and advertising
—excluding social
media
Be knowledgeable about regulations regarding social media and your firm’s specific policies.
8
Social media
Traditional
advertising
PR
. Figure 10: Percentage of marketing budget attributed to marketing activities*
Other RIAs
Marketing Leaders
Mean percentage
100%
75%
50%
31%
25%
13%
21%
20%
19%
25%
15%
18%
14%
3%
0%
Communications
Collateral
Events
*If firm uses the activity.
In addition, more Marketing Leaders
say all these activities are strategically
important to their business, with
over half (51%) pointing to the high
importance of collateral and events.
Not surprisingly, Marketing Leaders
spend most of their marketing budget
on these two activities (see Figure 10).
Other RIAs spend most of their budget
on events and communications.
Marketing Leaders view events, in
particular, as being an effective way to
Digital marketing
and advertising
—excluding social
media
4%
Social media
generate new business (see Figure 11),
and they are twice as likely to use
events with prospects than Other RIAs
(20% for Marketing Leaders versus 10%
for Other RIAs). The effectiveness of
events can likely be attributed to the
time and money put into this activity,
with more Marketing Leaders saying
a high level of effort is required by
their marketing staff for events than
Other RIAs.
9%
Traditional
advertising
5%
3%
PR
43% versus 26%
Percentage of Marketing Leaders
that say a high level of effort
is required by marketing staff
for events versus Other RIAs
Figure 11: Effectiveness in generating new business*
Percentage of firms that
RATED EACH ACTIVITY as
very effective:
Marketing Leaders
Other RIAs
Events
60%
34%
Collateral
31%
16%
Communications
27%
11%
* ercentage of firms that selected a 6 or a 7 on a scale of 1 to 7, where 1 = Not Effective
P
and 7 = Highly Effective.
9
. While social media is still relatively
new to the marketing mix, Marketing
Leaders use more tactics in this area
than Other RIAs (see Figure 12). Our
Study shows that a larger percentage
of Marketing Leaders have also
been tapping into these channels
for 24 months or more, showing a
willingness to be earlier adopters
of new techniques.
47% versus 21%
Of firms using Twitter, percentage of
Marketing Leaders using Twitter for
24 months or more versus Other RIAs
57% versus 36%
Of firms using Facebook,
percentage of Marketing Leaders
using Facebook for 24 months
or more versus Other RIAs
10
Figure 12: Use of social media tactics
LinkedIn®
Blogs
Twitter®
Facebook®
42%
31%
Marketing Leaders
27%
25%
26%
19%
14%
Other RIAs
17%
. Additional Resources
F
iring on All Cylinders: Fueling Growth with
Benchmarking Insights
Section III: Actions to Consider
Marketing Leaders have taken important steps to develop growth engines for their
firms, and Other RIAs may want to adopt some of their practices to help enhance their
own marketing and business development programs. In addition, sound capabilities
on this front may be perceived as important when being reviewed by valuation
specialists who can take into account the ability to generate revenue organically when
looking at the overall worth of a firm.
The results of this Study suggest that firms should consider the following:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Develop a marketing plan, assigning responsibilities and milestones, and create metrics
to measure progress and success. In addition, update that plan annually or
semiannually to make sure it supports any changes in business strategy and
incorporates any learnings from the prior year.
Craft a more compelling firm story, targeted to their ideal clients, that is well understood by
staff members. This should be reflected in all sales and marketing materials in a
consistent way, and actively shared with clients and COIs.
Establish specific referral processes and programs to create more operational discipline
around referrals.
Let clients and COIs know what type of investor is a good fit for
the firm, and keep in touch to stay top of mind and report on progress.
B
uilding an Action Plan to Drive Growth
Within Your Practice:
A Business Development and Marketing
Planning Toolkit
C
reating a Consistent Story for Clients and
Prospects:
A Story Development Guide
A
Guide to Growing Your Business Through
Centers of Influence
and Strategic Alliance Marketing
C
reating the Best Communications Program
for Your Clients and Prospects
H
osting Events to Help Strengthen and
Grow Your Business
D
igging into Digital Advice
Make sure staff members have the right skills and training to excel at business development.
Tie incentives to actual results to keep business development professionals
focused on new revenue generation.
Measure which marketing activities have the biggest impact on their business and which
ones are most appropriate for key audiences— clients, prospects, and COIs. Then
execute accordingly, putting more time and money behind the most effective
techniques. Events may be the best place to start, given the focus that
Marketing Leaders place on this activity.
Test the waters with newer or less widely utilized activities, like social media or PR, to see what
kind of results can be generated.
Hire a third party to help build a marketing plan, develop a firm story, and/or execute specific
activities.
Insights and support from a marketing specialist may help boost efforts
and provide new momentum.
11
. 20 0 se aport boule vard
boston, ma 02210
Please contact your Fidelity representative, call our main number at 888.678.1611, or visit our Web site
to access additional resources and to learn more about Fidelity’s RIA Benchmarking program and the
Practice Management and Consulting program.
For investment professional and institutional investor use only. Not for distribution to the public as sales material in any form.
The information contained herein is as of the date of its publication, is subject to change, and is general in nature. Such information is provided
for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, tax, or compliance advice. Fidelity does not provide legal, tax, or compliance
advice.
Fidelity cannot guarantee that such information is accurate, complete, or timely. Federal and state laws and regulations are complex and
are subject to change. Laws of a specific state or laws that may be applicable to a particular situation may affect the applicability, accuracy, or
completeness of this information.
This information is not individualized and is not intended to serve as the primary or sole basis for your decisions, as there may be other factors you
should consider, and it may not be inclusive of everything that a firm should consider in this type of planning decision.
Some of the concepts may
not be applicable to all firms. Always consult an attorney, tax professional, or compliance advisor regarding your specific legal or tax situation.
The 2014 Fidelity RIA Benchmarking Study was conducted between May 6 and June 30, 2014, in collaboration with an independent third-party
research firm unaffiliated with Fidelity Investments; 411 firms participated. The experiences of the RIAs who responded may not be representative
of the experiences of other RIAs and are not an indication of future success.
Registering for, completing, and accessing the survey required access to and use of a third-party Web site, operated by an independent third-party
research firm unaffiliated with Fidelity Investments.
The third-party providers listed herein are neither affiliated with nor an agent of Fidelity, and are
not authorized to make representations on behalf of Fidelity. Their input herein does not suggest a recommendation or endorsement by Fidelity.
This information was provided by the third-party providers and is subject to change. There is no form of legal partnership, agency, affiliation, or
similar relationship between an investment professional, the third-party service providers, and Fidelity Investments, nor is such a relationship
created or implied by the information herein.
Third-party marks are the property of their respective owners; all other marks are the property of FMR LLC.
Fidelity Family Office Services is a division of Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC, Member NYSE, SIPC.
Fidelity Clearing and Custody provides clearing, custody, or other brokerage services through National Financial Services LLC or Fidelity Brokerage
Services LLC, Members NYSE, SIPC.
The material in this report is copyrighted by Fidelity Investments.
No portion of these materials may be reproduced, distributed, or otherwise used
in any form without the express written consent of Fidelity Investments.
© 2015 FMR LLC. All rights reserved.
704110.5.01.9863706.100
0215
.