In Plain Sight: 10 Common
Employee Benefit Plan Pitfalls
Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. is pleased to present this whitepaper on
the common errors that occur in employee benefit plan reporting.
Qualified retirement benefit plans are dynamic. Tax laws change. Employees enter and leave the
retirement plan and make changes to their contribution levels.
Qualified retirement plans must also
be prepared to adapt to changes in the rules and regulations in order to stay compliant. If the array
of technical requirements set forth by the Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Labor’s
(DOL) Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) are not met, plan sponsors may be
exposed to significant costs to correct any errors and penalties. In extreme cases, noncompliance could
result in the plan losing its qualified status.
.
In Plain Sight: 10 Common Employee Benefit Plan Pitfalls
The IRS recognizes that everyone makes mistakes. It has
developed correction programs collectively known as the
Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System (EPCRS) so
that plan sponsors can correct errors through self-correction
or, in some cases, come forward to the IRS with proposed
corrections in order to retain the plan’s qualified status.
By monitoring areas that can lead to a higher compliance
risk, plan sponsors can mitigate the risk of errors and
remedy problems before they trigger lasting consequences.
Below are common mistakes that the IRS and DOL have
uncovered through audits or through their correction
programs. Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. professionals
in their capacity as independent auditors of large plans
frequently find some of these compliance errors as well.
Plan management should periodically review the following
to ensure the plan’s policies and procedures meet
regulatory standards.
1.
Eligible Versus Ineligible Employees
The failure to include eligible employees in the plan or
to exclude ineligible employees ranks among the most
common errors. Definitions of eligibility should consider
part-time, leased or temporary employees, student interns
and employees of related employers such as Controlled
Groups and Affiliated Service Groups.
Other eligibility compliance problems could arise from:
n Entry dates – Be sure that the entry dates being
used in plan operations (e.g., monthly, quarterly, semiannually) are consistent with the dates specified in the
retirement plan documents and that in a 401(k) plan or
other deferral plan, eligible employees are given the
opportunity to participate.
n Automatic enrollment and escalation – Automatic
enrollment plans where employees are automatically
enrolled if they do not affirmatively elect to participate or
not to participate in the plan have become very popular in
401(k) and other deferral plans. Automatic increases are
also popular.
It is very important that these provisions be
implemented in accordance with the plan document and in
accordance with the required notices to participants. Failure
to automatically enroll an employee could cost the employer
contribution dollars. Some companies may opt for a fixed
escalation date as of the first day of the plan year.
Others
may use the employee’s employment anniversary. It is best
that the plan administrator use a detailed tracking system
to help monitor the enrollment and any escalation dates
to ensure these features are properly administered and
aligned with the plan’s provisions.
n Treatment for rehires – Once employees satisfy the
requirements for plan eligibility (e.g., waiting periods),
they are generally eligible for plan participation even if
they leave the company and then return. In fact, with a
rare exception, rehires who previously met the eligibility
conditions re-enter the benefit plan right away.
To avoid
mistakes in this area, the employer should understand how
their plan treats re-hires and create internal procedures for
how to handle a rehire’s re-entry into the plan.
Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.
2
. In Plain Sight: 10 Common Employee Benefit Plan Pitfalls
2. Eligible Compensation
Compensation can be defined in several ways for plan
purposes. Plan sponsors should understand the plan’s
definition of compensation and apply it correctly to each
portion of the plan. Consistency in determining which types
of pay qualify for employee benefit contributions helps
reduce the risk of error.
Common mistakes that arise from the
definition of compensation include:
â–º ailure to follow the terms of the plan document.
F
Most plans define compensation as W-2 wages
adding back deferrals and other contributions not
subject to taxes.
Some plans exclude bonuses,
overtime and commissions from compensation.
These exclusions may require special
nondiscrimination testing.
â–º mproper inclusion or exclusion of compensation
I
prior to plan entry;
â–º reatment of severance pay;
T
â–º omputation of earned income for selfC
employment earnings; and
â–º ailure to coordinate HR and payroll systems.
F
For best results, plan sponsors should consult with human
resources personnel and other payroll specialists during the
eligible compensation definition process.
3. Contributions
Employees
Employees frequently change the percentage or amount they
contribute to their 401(k) or other type of deferral plan, and
plans may miss when an employee requests to change the
Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.
contribution. The result can be costly for the plan sponsor,
especially if the mistake continues over several years.
The
IRS holds the plan sponsor liable for one-half of the lost
deferral opportunity plus earnings during that period.
To minimize corrective contributions from a missed
contribution election, plan sponsors may want to consider
including language into the plan document that puts the
responsibility on the employee to notify management if
election changes have not taken effect within 30 days of the
date he or she made the change.
Employee contributions can also be problematic with:
n Irregular checks, Discretionary and One-Time
Checks – Monitor off-cycle paychecks to be sure
employee elective deferral contributions are properly
withheld (or not withheld).
n Regular pay after severance of employment – The
IRS considers commissions, bonuses and any other pay
for services performed prior to severance—including
cash outs of vacation, sick and other leave time—to be
regular compensation. Therefore, employee elective
deferral contributions may need to be withheld from
these paychecks. Compensation after severance of
employment can only be treated as regular pay if paid by
the later of 2 ½ months after severance from employment
or by the end of the plan year in which the severance
occurred.
Compensation, in this definition, means the
compensation that the employee would have received
even if he or she had not separated from service.
In general, employee elective deferral contributions should
not be withheld from true severance pay or other types of
“parachute” payments. True severance pay is generally pay
that the employee would not have otherwise received had
he or she not separated from service. Plan administrators
need to have a thorough understanding of how the plan
treats compensation received after separation from service
to determine the appropriate deferral withholding.
3
.
‘‘ ’’
In Plain Sight: 10 Common Employee Benefit Plan Pitfalls
“In the IRS’ 401(K) fix-it guide, failure
to apply the matching formula properly
is noted as the fourth most common
mistake in 401(k) plans. ”
Employer Matching Contributions
Verify that the calculation for employer matching contributions
is both correct and in line with the employer matching
definition in the retirement plan documents or the discretionary
match that the employer intended. Plan sponsors must also
understand the employer matching computation period. If
the computation period is the plan year, plan sponsors may
have to “true up” or annualize the employer match at the end
of the plan year.
Simply following a payroll schedule may not
accurately reflect the employer match formula.
4. Vesting
5. Timely Deposit of Elective Deferrals
Employee contributions are always 100 percent owned
or “vested” by the employee.
Employer contributions,
however, may have a vesting schedule, which can be found
in the plan document. The IRS has established minimum
standards that employee benefit plans’ vesting schedules
must meet, so be sure the vesting schedule used by the
plan complies with these requirements.
The DOL has placed a great deal of focus over the last
several years on timely deposits of employee deferrals
and loan payments. The DOL requires employee salary
deferrals and loan payments be deposited on the
earliest date that the deferrals can be segregated from
the employer’s general assets.
With increased payroll
technology coupled with the growth of managed 401(k)
investment platforms, the DOL is looking for deposits within
a few days of payroll. There may be exceptions for multiple
locations, multiple payrolls, etc., but the timeframe for the
deposits must be reasonable and consistent.
Years or periods of service generally determine an
employee’s eligibility and vesting. In general, there are two
methods to determine years or periods of service.
Under the
hours method, the vesting schedule is based either on the
actual number of hours worked or an equivalency method for
employees whose hours are not maintained by the employer,
such as full-time salaried employees. The IRS generally
considers a year of service for vesting purposes as the plan
year during which the employee works 1,000 hours.
If hours are not maintained, an equivalency method should
be used such as crediting 45 hours per week or 190 hours
per month. Plans can also use an elapsed time method,
which is a period such as 12 months with no hourly
requirement attached to it.
Keep these definitions of service
consistent to ensure benefits provided accurately reflect
employees’ time with the company.
Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.
There is a safe harbor period for deposits for small plans1.
These plans must make the deposit no later than the
seventh business day following the date the salary deferral
is withheld.
Late deposits are considered a prohibited transaction and
must be reported on the Form 5500. The late deposits,
including earnings, must be restored to the plan. Late
deposits are subject to an excise tax equal to 15 percent of
the restored earnings.
Prohibited transactions are reported
on the Form 5330. Relief from the excise tax may apply
if the employer files under the DOL’s Voluntary Fiduciary
Correction Program (VFCP).
4
. In Plain Sight: 10 Common Employee Benefit Plan Pitfalls
The DOL encourages employers to file under the VFCP to
report and explain the late deferrals, why they occurred,
how the deferrals and related earnings were restored to
the plan and what procedures the employer put in place
to prevent late deferrals in the future. Because the late
deposits must be reported on the Form 5500 and create
a “red flag” to the DOL, the DOL has indicated that this
program will offer relief from a DOL audit. The VFCP may
also allow the employer to avoid filing the Form 5330 to
pay the excise tax by depositing the excise tax into the
participant accounts.
6. Plan Amendments
Amendments to the plan must generally be adopted by
the last day of the plan year for which they apply.
Plan
sponsors should be sure their plan amendments are
adopted and signed in the proper timeframe to avoid
compliance issues.
To simplify the amendment process, plan sponsors
should specify who has the power to adopt benefit plan
amendments, be it an amendment board, committee or
officer. Plan sponsors should maintain in their permanent
records all plan documents, service contracts, summary
plan descriptions and material modifications as well as key
participant communication documents.
7. Plan Loan Provisions
Many retirement plans allow for plan loans to participants,
so long as the loan meets the terms established by the
Internal Revenue Code (IRC).
Employees are responsible
for repaying the loan within a designated timeframe.
Loan repayment deferrals are available in some cases.
For example, an employee who is on an extended leave of
absence may suspend repayment of the loan for up to one
year, so long as that one year does not extend beyond the
the repayment period designated by IRC Section 72(p).
Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.
General Plan Loan Requirements
IRC Section 72(p) defines the terms as follows:
â–º
The loan must be repaid within five years
(exception for residential loans);
â–º he loan must have a reasonable interest rate
T
(i.e., a maximum of 1 to 2 percent above the
market rate);
â–º he loan must meet the dollar limit imposed by
T
IRC 72(p);
â–º Repayment of the loan must be broken up into
level payments of principal and interest that are
paid at least on a quarterly basis.
Military personnel may be able to suspend their loan
repayment for more than a year if called to military service
during their employment.
Should an employee suspend payment at any time, the
repayment structure of the loan must be recalculated so
that the loan balance can still be paid off in level payments
within the five-year repayment window. There are special
exceptions for suspensions due to military leave.
Plan sponsors may allow for a grace period for loan
repayments so long as the period does not extend past the
quarter following the quarter in which the payment was due.
Plan loan errors must generally be corrected under the
IRS Voluntary Compliance Program. This is advisable
to avoid a prior taxable event to the participant, and in
some circumstances, the IRS may grant the plan relief
from reporting the loans as taxable distributions if certain
corrections are made.
5
.
In Plain Sight: 10 Common Employee Benefit Plan Pitfalls
8. In-Service Withdrawals
Plan documents may provide for distributions prior to an employee’s termination. Generally, plans provide that an employee must be at least age 59 ½ in order to avoid penalty taxes.
Hardship withdrawals are also permitted under certain
plans. Plans that elect to include hardship provisions
must be sure the hardship provision meets prescribed
regulations.
In general, participants must exhaust other
options such as plan loans. Many plans choose to follow
the IRS “safe harbor” standards for making distributions for
hardship reasons.
IRS Safe Harbor Standards for Hardship
Distributions
An employee is automatically considered to have
an immediate and pressing financial need for a
retirement plan distribution in the following scenarios:
â–º
Medical care expenses for the employee, the
employee’s spouse, dependents or beneficiary
â–º
Costs directly related to the purchase of an
employee’s principal residence (excluding
mortgage payments)
â–º
Tuition, related educational fees and room
and board expenses for the next 12 months of
postsecondary education for the employee or
the employee’s spouse, children, dependents or
beneficiary
â–º
Payments necessary to prevent the eviction of the
employee from the employee’s principal residence
â–º
Funeral expenses for the employee, the
employee’s spouse, children, dependents, or
beneficiary
â–º
Certain expenses to repair damage to the
employee’s principal residence
Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.
Keeping records of hardship distributions can help reduce
the risk for abuse of the policy. Plan sponsors should watch
for identical requests made by multiple employees and
monitor the loans to ensure they were completed according
to the plan’s terms.
If a distribution is made and the plan does not allow for
hardship distributions, plan sponsors can generally go to
the IRS under its Voluntary Compliance Program and ask to
retroactively adopt a hardship distribution amendment.
9.
Distribution of Plan Benefits
It is very important that the employer retain the proper
documentation for distributions from the plan. The plan
document will define when a terminated participant is
entitled to his or her benefits. The plan document may also
define how and under what circumstances a participant
may be required to take a distribution from the plan.
Terminated participants with more than $5,000 cannot be
forced to take a distribution from the plan.
Written consent
is required for a distribution, although there may be a plan
provision that force-outs may occur when a terminated
participant reaches the age of 62.
Many retirement plans are required to distribute benefits
to participants in the form of a Qualified Joint and Survivor
Annuity (QJSA). A QJSA provides a life annuity to the
participant and a survivor annuity for the spouse’s life
following the participant’s death.
The QJSA may be waived by the participant and the benefit
may be paid under an alternative method such as a lump
sum distribution. If the participant is married, the spouse
must consent to the alternative form of distribution.
Sometimes, the distribution is incorrectly made without
the spousal consent.
This can happen when the sponsor’s
human resources accounting system incorrectly classifies a
participant as not married. One possible correction method
is to notify the affected participant and spouse (to whom
the participant was married at the time of the distribution)
so that the spouse can provide spousal consent to the
distribution actually made.
6
. In Plain Sight: 10 Common Employee Benefit Plan Pitfalls
If spousal consent to the prior distribution cannot be
obtained because the spouse refuses to consent, does not
respond to the notice or because the spouse cannot be
located, the spouse is entitled to a benefit under the plan.
This benefit is equal to the portion of the QJSA that would
have been payable to the spouse upon the death of the
participant had a QJSA been provided to the participant
under the plan at his or her retirement. Such spousal
benefit must be provided if a claim is made by the spouse.
It is also important for plans to maintain beneficiary records
of all participants in the event of a participant death.
Participants should be reminded to make sure that the form
on file is correct. These records are binding.
Beneficiary forms may be provided by the plan document
provider or they may be provided by the investment
platform that holds the investments. Spouses must be
named as the beneficiary unless the spouse consents
to another named beneficiary.
Special rules apply if the
plan provides for Joint and Survivor Annuities. The plan
document will also define how distributions will be made to
beneficiaries and the timing of those distributions.
After plan participants who have terminated their
employment reach age 70 ½, they must begin taking
minimum distributions from the plan. If the participant is a
more than a 5 percent owner, the participant must begin
taking minimum distributions at age 70 ½ regardless of his
or her employment status.
Plan sponsors must make the appropriate distribution in a
timely manner to avoid compliance concerns.
If participants
or beneficiaries do not receive their minimum distribution on
time, they (not the plan) are subject to a 50 percent additional
tax on the underpayment. If the plan does not make a prompt
distribution, it can correct the error through the IRS Voluntary
Compliance program and request that the excise tax be
waived by calculating the distribution plus the interest earnings
from the date of the failure to the date of the distribution.
10. Calculation of Pension Benefit
To demonstrate pension benefits are correctly calculated,
defined benefit plans need to maintain historical records
Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.
that include employees’ years of service and eligible
compensation.
Even if plan sponsors use third-party record
keepers, the plan sponsors are responsible for the retention
of historical records. This can be problematic when there
are changes in third-party record keepers.
Issues can also arise with document retention policies.
Many companies have policies where documents are
disposed after a certain number of years. To ensure
valuable retirement plan data are not lost, be sure
retirement plan data are excluded from document disposal.
Conclusion
To mitigate the risk of penalties, plans should be regularly
evaluated for mistakes.
Under the Employee Plans
Compliance Resolution System (EPCRS), the IRS offers
three programs for correcting plan errors:
n Self-Correction Program (SCP)
n Voluntary Correction Program (VCP)
n Audit Closing Agreement Program (Audit CAP)
The SCP or VCP programs are less time-consuming
and less costly than the Audit CAP program for
correcting errors discovered during an audit of the plan
by the IRS. The Audit CAP program typically involves
sanctions with steeper price tags than correcting the
error under SCP or VCP. Furthermore, errors could
result in a material impact on financial statements,
which could affect the timeliness of your employee
benefit plan’s audit.
Plans with known errors will likely
be asked to show more transparency in the areas where
the errors occurred. Repeated noncompliance with
financial regulations could cost an employee benefit
plan its qualified tax status.
Plan sponsors who are concerned about whether
noncompliance resulted from a weakness or deficiency
within their plan documents or internal controls should
consult with their auditor or third-party administrator or
other service provider for further guidance. They may be
able to make recommendations for ways to improve your
plan and prevent future compliance errors.
7
.
In Plain Sight: 10 Common Employee Benefit Plan Pitfalls
About Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.
Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C. is a national, independent
CPA firm with offices in most major markets and gateway
cities throughout the country. While we can pull from our
vast array of credentials nationally, our professionals take
pride in delivering a very personalized level of service to
each and every client. Furthermore, our professionals are
committed to the profession and the industries in which
they serve clients.
Whether it’s involvement on committees
of regulatory bodies in the accounting profession or
members of industry associations, MHM’s professionals
are regular authors and presenters of accounting content,
showing a dedication to their work and to our clients.
When you choose Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C., you get
proactive, accessible professionals who communicate in
understandable terms, and deliver practical solutions on
time and with no surprises.
We are distinguished by the quality, credibility and insight
of our accounting and auditing professionals who take the
time to get to know each of our clients and the specific
issues they face.
Our audit services are designed to:
n xamine your business to identify areas of financial
E
statement risk.
n educe your risk of material misstatement.
R
n rovide informative financial statement results reporting
P
to your management, audit committee or board.
n eliver effective strategies and recommendations
D
designed to enhance the value of your business.
n eep you informed regarding pertinent accounting
K
standards and assist in the implementation of applicable
new standards.
n ase the audit process by giving your accounting
E
personnel adequate lead time to prepare required
documentation.
n eet all internal or external deadlines.
M
Endnotes
1 mall plans are plans with fewer than 100 participants. The number of participants as of the first day of the plan year dictates whether you have a large
S
or small plan for Form 5500 purposes. Employees become includable as “participants” on the date that the employee becomes eligible to participate regardless of whether they elect to participate.
The participant count must include (1) actively participating employees, (2) retired, deceased, or separated
employees who still have assets in the plan and (3) all eligible employees who have yet to enroll or have elected not to enter the plan. A special ruling
(80/120 Rule) allows plans with between 80 and 120 participants, as of the first day of the plan year, to file the Form 5500 in the same category (“large plan”
or “small plan”) as indicated on the prior year Form 5500 filing
For further information on our audit services for private companies or to submit an RFP,
please visit www.mhmcpa.com or call 1-877-887-1090.
www.mhmcpa.com
A member of Kreston International | A global network of independent accounting firms
@mhm_pc
company/Mayer-Hoffman-McCann-P
.C.
© Copyright 2015. Mayer Hoffman McCann P All rights reserved.
.C.
www.kreston.com
8
.