Electricity, Oil and
Gas Regulation in
the United States
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
. ATTORNEY ADVERTISING. The comments contained herein do not constitute legal opinion and should not be regarded
as a substitute for legal advice. Results depend on a number of factors unique to each matter. Prior results do not
guarantee a similar outcome.
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
1540 Broadway | New York, NY 10036 | 877.323.4171
www.pillsburylaw.com
© 2010 Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP.
All rights reserved.
Reproduced with permission from Law Business Research. These articles were first published in the Getting the Deal
Through publications Electricity Regulation 2009, Electricity Regulation 2011, Oil Regulation 2010 and Gas Regulation
2010. For further information please visit www.GettingtheDealThrough.com.
.
Professionals in the power, oil and gas sectors of the energy industry are finding that these fields are
experiencing a great deal of convergence. Generators must compare the benefits and costs of renewable
and nuclear power against the attributes of natural gas sources whether procured on the home market or
—
via international LNG shipments or cross-border gas pipelines. Gas suppliers must understand not only the
downstream electricity markets, but also oilfield concepts such as gas recovered in associated oil production
and domestic shale resources newly accessible through horizontal drilling. And oil producers concerned with
the future of transportation fuels must be aware of electricity, carbon-to-liquids, and biofuel as competitive
sources in the decades to come.
Pillsbury energy lawyers have strong experience across the entire fuel spectrum—nuclear, renewables, oil
and gas, and conventional generation—and are well positioned to speak on the regulatory aspects of each of
these converging sectors.
We have contributed to the Getting the Deal Through series for several years. This
publication asks energy lawyers to provide detailed overviews of the regulatory landscape in each of a number
of producing and consuming countries. This brochure contains our introductory remarks on electricity markets
generally, and our latest analyses of the power, oil and gas sectors in the United States of America in particular.
We hope this information is useful as an initial reference for our clients and our other friends.
Robert A.
James
Co-leader, Global Energy Industry Team
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
. lectricity Introduction
. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
introduction
introduction
Electricity Introduction
Joseph H Fagan, Becky M Bruner, Michael S Hindus and robert A James
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP*
The current state of electric infrastructure in the US and the rest
of the world is inadequate to serve future energy demand. Mindful of this trend, legislators and regulators in the US have adopted
policies aimed at promoting the development of such infrastructure,
while at the same time acknowledging that much of it will facilitate more widespread use of ‘clean’ renewable energy sources. By
some estimates, the cost of building the new and replacement electric
infrastructure projects to meet the anticipated demand by 2030 will
be close to US$600 billion. Providing sufficient incentives for market participants to invest in these projects, while at the same time
encouraging the use of renewable ‘carbon-friendly’ energy sources in
as efficient and as cost-effective manner as possible, is illustrative of
one of key challenges facing the US in the 21st century.
Status of electric infrastructure in the united States
Electricity consumption in the US is expected to increase by at least
40 per cent by 2030.
To provide adequate and reliable electricity
service to meet this projected demand, the US will need to invest
heavily in all aspects of its energy infrastructure. The Energy Information Administration (EIA) estimates that 258GW of new generating capacity will be needed by 2030, at a cost of approximately
US$412 billion (in 2005 dollars).
More than half of the electricity generated in the US comes
from coal, and coal is projected to remain a vital energy resource. In
response to concerns about global warming, new technologies are
being developed to eliminate or capture harmful greenhouse gases
(GHG) emitted from coal-fired power plants.
The US is also encouraging development of renewable energy sources, such as wind, solar,
geothermal, hydrogen and biomass. Currently, renewable resources
are used to generate about 7 per cent of the total electricity produced
in the US. Nuclear energy is the second-largest fuel source for electricity production in the US today and it is the largest source of emissionfree generation.
Natural gas, however, is projected to be the major
fuel source for electricity in the next 20 years when 900 of the next
1,000 power plants are expected to be fuelled by natural gas.
Most of the US’s existing transmission grid was constructed prior
to the advent of wholesale competition and active market trading.
This ageing transmission system must be expanded and upgraded
to meet the needs of the growing US population, robust wholesale
trading and the interconnection of distant generation resources, particularly wind and solar. The Edison Electric Institute reports that
from 2000 to 2006, electric companies invested more than US$37.8
billion in the nation’s transmission system, and that they are expected
to invest an additional US$37 billion from 2007 to 2010.
Legislative developments
Federal
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005) made important modifications to US energy policy. Among them, EPAct 2005 directed
www.gettingthedealthrough.com
FERC to promote the development of transmission infrastructure by
promoting capital investment in the enlargement and improvement
of the nation’s transmission grid.
EPAct 2005 also allowed federal
income tax credits and accelerated depreciation for certain investments in transmission property.
The Energy Improvement and Extension Act of 2008 (Energy
Improvement Act) adopted an extension and expansion of the tax
incentives for renewable energy projects as well as a host of related
tax incentives for energy development. Principal among these is
an extension of the ‘production tax credits’ for renewable energy
sources, which were otherwise due to expire at the end of 2008.
Such extensions are critical to the industries affected, since the production tax credits are essential to the economics of the projects
using the technologies. However, the relatively brief extensions will
not accommodate longer-term projects.
In addition, US$800 million
of ‘clean renewable energy bonds’ were authorised to finance qualifying renewable energy facilities for governmental, public power and
electric cooperative entities.
In contrast to the relatively brief extension of the production
tax credits, the Energy Improvement Act provides for an eight-year
extension of the 30 per cent investment tax credit for solar energy
and fuel cells. This change is likely to act as a boost for the long-term
planning and development of large-scale solar and fuel cell projects.
Investment credits were also added for several resources, including, qualifying cogeneration systems, small wind and geothermal
heat pump systems. In addition, investment tax credits were made
available for qualifying coal and gasification projects.
Credits are
increased for those projects that achieve the greatest percentage of
carbon dioxide separation and sequestration.
In the US and around the world, governments are moving to reshape their energy policies, regulate GHG emissions and otherwise
implement measures aimed at curbing the effects of global warming.
In the coming years, it is anticipated that initiatives will be adopted in
the US aimed at reducing GHG emissions that may include establishment of a cap-and-trade programme or a carbon tax.
State
Many state governments have not waited for comprehensive federal
action and have instead acted on their own. They have developed
measures to reduce GHG emissions that include initiatives to conduct emissions inventories, project future emissions based on population and economic growth, and identify areas where emissions can
be reduced and develop reduction goals. States and regions are very
active in promulgating legislation and taking decisive, discrete action
that will impact the electricity generation sector.
In addition to climate change legislation, more than two dozen
states have implemented renewable portfolio standards (RPS) aimed
at reducing carbon emissions and encouraging the development of
renewable resources.
RPS guidelines require that affected electricity
. introduction
providers (such as electric utilities) include a specified amount of
renewable energy as part of their generation portfolios.
regulatory developments
Pro-transmission policies
In recent years, the US has developed a number of pro-transmission
policies, including development of an incentive base rate structure for
transmission facilities as well as identification of areas of transmission congestion.
EPAct 2005 directed the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to establish, by rule, an incentive-based rate structure
for the transmission of electric energy in interstate commerce. Specifically, the incentive rate structures must provide a return on equity
(ROE) that attracts investment and allows recovery of all costs prudently incurred in complying with new reliability standards. The
rulemaking resulted in Order No. 679, essentially affirmed by Order
Nos 679-A and 679-B.
Order No. 679 established a framework for
incentive-based ROEs available to all public utilities for new investments in transmission that benefit consumers by ensuring reliability
or reducing the cost of delivered power by reducing congestion. In
Order No.
679-A, the FERC specifically stated that the ‘most compelling case’ for incentive-based ROEs is new projects with special
risks or challenges, not routine investments made in the ordinary
course of expanding the system to provide safe and reliable transmission service. FERC has approved close to a dozen of such proposals under its new transmission incentives policy.
In addition, EPAct 2005 directed the Department of Energy
(DoE) to identify transmission congestion and constraints and to
conduct a nationwide study of electric transmission congestion every
three years. Geographical areas where transmission congestion or
constraints adversely affect consumers may be designated as national
interest electric transmission corridors (national corridors).
The
DoE has designated two national corridors: the Mid-Atlantic Area
National Corridor and the Southwest National Corridor. This action
puts the states and the industry on notice that there are transmission
congestion problems in such areas that must be addressed. It also
provides the FERC with new federal ‘backstop’ siting authority to
issue construction permits for facilities located in a national corridor
under certain circumstances.
For example, if an applicant does not
receive approval from a state to site a proposed new transmission
project within a national corridor within a year, the FERC may consider whether to issue a permit and to authorise construction.
Interconnection policies
Interconnection policy is a priority for all advocates of locationally
constrained electric power generation, including wind, solar and
biomass resources. In order to make these technologies work on the
scale necessary to achieve long-lasting rewards, they must be integrated into the existing transmission system. Before these resources
can be interconnected, the transmission provider must perform a
series of impact studies and consider alternatives for interconnection
points.
The FERC’s existing set of rules are based on its Order No.
2003, as reflected in each transmission provider’s interconnection
procedures and agreements for large generators and small generators of 20MW and below. The FERC also formalised a rule specifically for wind power facilities larger than 20MW.
With the steep rise in applications from small renewable projects,
predominantly wind, the normal queuing process that traditionally subscribed to a ‘first-come-first-served’ philosophy is being
overwhelmed and bogged down. Many transmission operators are
being forced to adjust their queuing rules in an attempt to alleviate the resulting backlogs.
The FERC facilitated an industry-wide
review of queuing practices by holding a technical conference in late
2007. In March 2008, The FERC issued an order requiring regional
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
transmission operators (RTO) and independent system operators
(ISO) to evaluate their queue management policies. Other transmission providers, outside the realm of ISOs and RTOs, are facing similar issues.
Going forward, numerous reforms are being considered,
including changes to reservation priority, increase to up-front payments, open seasons and temporary rule suspensions to allow RTOs
and ISOs to clear the queue more often than the three-year grace
period that was adopted under Order No. 2003.
Within this framework, interconnection policy is quickly evolving.
Significant regional variations exist, with queuing practices becoming
part of the discussion of forward capacity markets in the north-eastern US and in the PJM Interconnection (encompassing such states as
Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware, Virginia and West
Virginia), and with different solutions being implemented in California. In the end, the laudable, if distant, goal of ‘grid parity’ for renewable generation resources will be little more than an illusion without
efficient and safe procedures for incorporating numerous types of new
generation into the existing transmission system.
current challenges to electric infrastructure development
Significant investment in all aspects of electric infrastructure is needed
to meet the projected demands of the economy and the growing population in the US for reliable, efficient and affordable electricity.
Development of new, emission-free generation facilities and expansion of
the nation’s bulk power transmission grid to connect new generation,
relieve congestion and ensure reliability are essential. Development
and integration of new generation resources, including renewables,
to the transmission grid face many obstacles. Construction of new
backbone transmission lines is needed along critical corridors where
existing facilities are constrained or new facilities are needed (or both).
While substantial efforts to expand the bulk power transmission grid
are underway, these projects face substantial challenges.
Transmission constraints
Transmission constraints are often an obstacle to integrating new generation resources.
The geographical location of renewable resources, for
example, is often far removed from the population centers that the new
infrastructure is intended to serve. The areas best suited for wind power
are located in the Midwest from north-western Texas to the Dakotas, as
well as coastal areas and mountain summits; the best solar regions, not
surprisingly, are located in or near the American south west. In many
instances, these location constraints present financial and commercial
obstacles as the necessary level of transmission investment required to
link these resources to distant load centres can be quite substantial.
Indeed, this is a key challenge that has become even more pronounced
with the implementation of RPS programmes throughout several dozen
states.
Numerous studies, including one by the DoE entitled ‘20 per cent
Wind Energy by 2030, Increasing Wind Energy’s Contribution to US
Electricity Supply’ have concluded that electric transmission must be
regarded as ‘a critical infrastructure element needed to enable regional
delivery and trade of energy resources, much as the interstate highway
system does for the nation’s transportation needs’.
Challenge of bringing intermittent resources online
Renewable reources, such as wind and solar are not only locationally constrained but also face the obstacle of being uncontrollably
variable, or intermittent in nature, providing electricity only when the
wind is blowing or the sun is shining. The sporadic nature of intermittent resources can potentially destabilise the grid and impair system
reliability if, for example, significant declines in renewable generation occurs simultaneously with rising load. For these reasons, among
others, the penetration of intermittent renewables in most power
grids is low; however, technology advances and regional planning
decreases the variable nature of intermittent resources.
For example,
Getting the deal through – Electricity regulation 2009
. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
introduction
by aggregating renewable units located in different geographic areas
through dynamic scheduling, the overall variability of output is
decreased. In addition, the variability associated with wind power
and solar power may be managed through the use of conventional
power generation assets that are dispatchable. When the wind stops
blowing, a conventional power generation resource, such as a natural
gas generator, is ramped up to compensate for the shortcoming.
Siting
State and local siting authorities have long had a negative impact
on the prospects of most proposed transmission capacity expansion
projects. With the exception of projects proposed in Alaska, Hawaii
or parts of Texas, all transmission expansion projects have beneficial effects in multiple states.
Yet, each state in which the proposed
project would be implemented has the power to block the project,
and some state agencies are required by law to consider only in-state
benefits when deciding whether to approve a project. To make matters worse, at least 22 states allow localities to block transmission
expansion projects, which often elicit powerful NIMBY-based local
opposition. This problem has become so severe in many parts of the
country that developers have become unwilling to even propose a
transmission expansion project.
In recent years, however, several pro-transmission policies have
addressed this issue.
Policymakers have begun a process providing
for federal or, possibly, regional siting and eminent domain authority
for interstate transmission projects. The first concrete step towards
federal siting authority was section 1221 of EPAct 2005, which gives
FERC limited jurisdiction over the siting of electric transmission lines
that fall within an official DoE-designated national corridor. For
example, if an applicant does not receive approval from a state to
site a proposed new transmission project within a national corridor
within a year’s time, the FERC may consider whether to issue a permit
and to authorise construction.
Notably, however, obtaining a federal
permit from FERC still would not in and of itself constitute a rightof-way across public or private property along a transmission route.
Such rights of way must be separately obtained. Moreover, outside the
confines of national corridors, the states’ traditional siting authority
over the electric transmission facilities remains as a significant bar-
rier to expansion projects. Many observers are of the view that the
lack of comprehensive federal siting authority for interstate electric
transmission lines, in contrast to the current statutory scheme governing natural gas pipelines, will serve to handicap the expansion and
replacement of the electric transmission grid.
Recovery of up-front costs of new technologies and new generation
Any investor in new energy infrastructure will require a reasonable
opportunity to recover its costs, either through cost-of-service regulated
rates or through market-based or negotiated rates.
A critical factor in
whether any such investment would be made is whether the regulator
will allow for recovery of the associated costs. Some new generation
technologies, for example ‘clean coal’ technologies to eliminate or capture harmful greenhouse gases emitted from coal-fired power plants,
are highly complex, risky and expensive. Investors are often unwilling
to invest in such technologies without some degree of up-front assurance of cost recovery from state regulators.
Similarly, development of
generation resources, such as wind and solar, in remote locations may
involve considerable risk if interconnection to the transmission grid
or transmission rights for delivery to load centres are questionable.
The absence of a regional transmission planning process or procedures
for determining cost allocation among jurisdictions, can pose a major
obstacle to the development of major backbone transmission projects.
Access to capital
Further complicating efforts to build out transmission is the cost of
raising capital for investment in transmission projects. For many utilities and merchant developers that have plans to invest in transmission,
managing project costs is a constant battle. A critical aspect of managing such costs is the cost of borrowing to finance what are likely to be
billion-dollar investments.
With world credit markets having seized up
in the fourth quarter of 2008, and with financial institutions from New
York to London more risk averse, in the least, the case for transmission
investment has become more financially uncertain. In the short term,
in the absence of investment-grade credit ratings, would-be transmission infrastructure developers should be prepared to self fund projects
if they want to have any realistic chance to meet their objectives along
the time frames that they proposed prior to the current market crisis.
Joseph H Fagan
Becky M Bruner
Michael S Hindus
robert A James
joseph.fagan@pillsburylaw.com
becky.bruner@pillsburylaw.com
michael.hindus@pillsburylaw.com
rob.james@pillsburylaw.com
0 Fremont Street
San Francisco
CA 910
USA
Tel: +1 1 98 1000
Fax: +1 1 98 1200
2 Houston Center
909 Fannin Street
Houston
TX 77010, USA
Tel: +1 71 276 7600
Fax: +1 71 276 767
200 N St NW
Washington, DC 2007
USA
Tel: +1 202 66 8000
Fax: +1 202 66 8007
www.pillsburylaw.com
www.gettingthedealthrough.com
. introduction
In addition, the costs of construction have increased substantially
over the past several years, and while recent turmoil in the global
commodity markets have tempered increases in the costs of raw
materials for energy infrastructure projects, such as iron, steel and
copper, any such lull is expected to be temporary given the unrelenting global demand for greater energy supply and the infrastructure
with which to deliver it.
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
greater investment in power projects will continue unabated. In order
to meet this demand, the role of government will be crucial, whether
in passing legislation or in enacting policies that encourage this investment, or in removing bureaucratic and market barriers that would
otherwise impede necessary development. The ability of market participants to react to, and to capitalise on such policies will go a long
way towards determining whether domestic and global infrastructure
needs are met in the coming decades.
conclusion
Going forward, market participants must be prepared to address the
numerous challenges facing electric infrastructure development today.
While no one has a crystal ball, it is a near-certainty that the need for
6
* The authors would like to thank Thomas C Orvald and Natara G Feller for their
assistance in drafting and researching this introduction.
Getting the deal through – Electricity regulation 2009
. . lectricity Regulation 201
. United StateS
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
United States
Electricity Regulation 2011
Michael S Hindus, Robert a James, Joseph H Fagan and Becky M Bruner*
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
1
Policy and law
What is the government policy and legislative framework for the
electricity sector?
No single government body sets government policy for the electricity
sector. The federal government, which regulates wholesale markets,
follows a generally pro-competitive policy. The competition reforms
that transformed the US electricity sector represent the latest chapter in three decades of restructuring, deregulation, and regulatory
reforms that affected industrial sectors of the economy historically
subject to price regulation. Retail sales are regulated by the states.
Several states have adopted choice programmes intended to introduce competition among retail suppliers of electricity.
While some
states have delayed or suspended retail choice plans amid concerns
that deregulation may not benefit end-use consumers, retail choice is
thriving in other states, such as New York and Texas.
US Congress
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005) represents the most
significant change in US energy policy since the Federal Power Act
of 1935 (FPA) and the Natural Gas Act of 1938 (NGA). EPAct 2005
granted the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) the
authority to issue rules to:
• prevent market manipulation in wholesale power and gas
markets, and in electric transmission and gas transportation
services;
• assess civil penalties for violations of the FPA and other energy
statutes;
• oversee mandatory reliability standards governing the nation’s
electricity grid; and
• approve the siting of transmission facilities, traditionally a matter
of state or local jurisdiction, under certain circumstances.
Federal administrative agencies
One of the top priorities of the US Department of Energy (DoE) is
to protect national and economic security by promoting a diverse
energy supply and the delivery of reliable, affordable and environmentally sound energy. FERC, an independent regulatory agency
within the DoE, is the principal economic and policy regulator at
the federal level for the electric power industry.
FERC is charged with
implementing, administering and enforcing most of the provisions
of EPAct 2005, FPA, NGA and other statutes regulating the electric
utility industry.
States
Beginning In the 1990s, a number of states undertook measures to
require or encourage vertically integrated utilities to disaggregate into
separate generation, transmission or distribution entities. Also, participation in independent system operators (ISOs) or regional transmission organisations (RTOs) was encouraged at the federal level
and in some states. In 2003, the Energy Information Administration
(EIA, part of the DoE) reported that 23 states (concentrated in the
188
north-east and Great Lakes regions) and the District of Columbia
had taken legislative or regulatory actions necessary to implement
retail choice in the electric sector (www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/
page/restructuring/restructure_elect.html, ‘Electricity Restructuring
by State’).
However, some states have since slowed their efforts to
promote retail choice and in 2007, Virginia decided to end its 10year experiment with deregulation and restored full-cost of service
regulation of retail sales. Following the disruption of the western
wholesale power markets in 2000 and 2001, California suspended
its retail access programme (www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/page/
restructuring/california.html). However, pursuant to a 2009 law,
effective 11 April 2010, the California Public Utilities Commission
increased the limits on the allowed level of direct access within the
service areas of California’s major investor-owned electric utilities.
The increased limits will be phased in over a four-year period and
are subject to annual caps.
Five other states have decided to delay
further implementation bringing the total number of suspended retail
access programmes to seven programmes as of 2010, one of which
has been reinstated (www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/page/restructuring/restructure_elect.html).
2
Organisation of the market
What is the organisational structure for the generation, transmission,
distribution and sale of power?
According to FERC, as of its most recent data from 2007 the US
electric industry is comprised of 3,273 electricity providers, including 2,009 publicly owned utilities, 883 co-operatives, 210 investorowned utilities and nine federal utilities.
The private sector includes traditional utilities that are vertically
integrated, generation-owning companies and power marketers, and
transmission or distribution ‘wires-only’ companies. These companies may be privately owned or publicly traded. The public sector
includes municipally owned utilities, public power districts, state
agencies, irrigation districts and other government organisations,
and at the federal level, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) and
federal power marketing administrations.
Rural electric co-operatives, formed by residents, operate in 47 states and represent about
10 per cent of sales and revenue (www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/
page/prim2/toc2.html, ‘Electric Power Industry Overview 2007’).
Generation
According to the EIA, net generation of electric power fell 0.9 percent
in 2008, to 4,119 million MWh as compared to 2007, mostly due
to an unusually cool year and the economic slowdown (www.eia.
doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epa/epa_sum.html, Electric Power Industry
2008: Year in Review: Generation, report released 21 January 2010
(next release date January 2011)). The three primary energy sources
for generating electric power in the United States are coal, natural
gas, and nuclear energy, which together have consistently provided
between 85 and 90 percent of total net generation during the period
Getting the deal through – electricity Regulation 2011
. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
1997 to 2008. Excluding conventional hydroelectric, whose share
was 6.2 per cent in 2008 but declining, renewable energy sources
have increased their share of total net generation for five straight
years, to 3.1 per cent in 2008.
The American Public Power Association (APPA) reports that in
2008, 39.9 per cent of generation came from investor-owned utilities,
38.8 per cent from non-utility power producers, 9.9 per cent from
publicly owned utilities, 6.7 per cent from federal power agencies,
and the remaining 4.7 per cent from cooperatives (www.appanet.
org/files/PDFs/GenerationStatistics.pdf, ‘Generation Statistics by
Fuel and Ownership’).
Power sales
Marketers do not generate, transmit or distribute electricity, but
are classified as public utilities under the FPA because they sell electricity at wholesale. In addition to the numerous privately owned
power marketers, there are four federally owned power marketing
administrations that market and sell the power produced at federal
hydroelectric and nuclear plants. As of June 2007, there were 438
independent power marketers, 123 power marketers affiliated with
public utilities, and 46 power marketers affiliated with financial
institutions, each with authorisation to sell power at wholesale in
the US.
transmission
The US bulk power transmission system is composed of facilities
that are privately, publicly, federally or cooperatively owned, which
form all or parts of three electric networks (power grids): the Eastern Interconnection, which stretches from central Canada to the
Atlantic Coast (excluding Quebec), south to Florida and west to the
Rockies (excluding much of Texas); the Western Interconnection,
which stretches from western Canada south to Mexico and east over
the Rockies to the Great Plains; and the Electric Reliability Council
of Texas (ERCOT), which serves a large portion of Texas.
Historically, transmission lines owned by private-sector
companies were part of a vertically integrated utility.
In 1996, FERC
issued Order No. 888, requiring each public utility subject to FERC’s
jurisdiction to:
• file an open-access transmission tariff (OATT) declaring the
terms and conditions for using its transmission system; and
• ‘functionally unbundle’ its services.
FERC has encouraged the development of ISOs and RTOs as
independent transmission providers within a region. These entities
are formed by utilities that transfer operational control – but not
ownership – of their transmission assets to the ISO or RTO, which
is then responsible for operating the regional transmission grid and
administering wholesale markets.
Today, two-thirds of electricity
consumers in the US are served within markets administered by seven
ISOs or RTOs: the PJM Interconnection (encompassing such states as
Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware, Virginia and West
Virginia), the Midwest ISO, the Southwest Power Pool, the New
York ISO, ISO-New England, the California ISO and ERCOT.
One of the responsibilities of ISOs and RTOs, as well as other
transmission providers, is maintenance of the short-term reliability of
the grid. Pursuant to EPAct 2005, FERC certified the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) as the nation’s Electric
Reliability Organization (ERO) to develop and enforce mandatory
reliability requirements to address medium- and long-term reliability concerns, subject to FERC oversight and enforcement. Today,
enforcement of electric reliability standards, including the protection
of critical energy infrastructure, is a major focus of the ERO and of
FERC, which may impose penalties up to US$1 million a day on
transmission or generation owners and operators for violation of
mandatory reliability standards.
www.gettingthedealthrough.com
United StateS
Regulation of electricity utilities – power generation
3
authorisation to construct and operate generation facilities
What authorisations are required to construct and operate generation
facilities?
The siting and construction of electric generation, transmission and
distribution facilities has historically been a state and local process,
although EPAct 2005 altered this historic arrangement by vesting
ultimate transmission siting authority with FERC in certain cases.
In making siting decisions, state public utility commissions (PUCs)
consider environmental, public health and economic factors.
The
PUCs exercise their authority in conjunction with state environmental agencies or local zoning boards. A few states have a siting board
or commission that provides a single forum where an electricity utility or independent developer can obtain all necessary authorisations
to construct electric facilities. Other states have not consolidated
the siting process, and electric utilities or independent developers
are there required to obtain the necessary permits separately from
each of the relevant state and local agencies.
State and local permits
required for the construction of electric generation facilities include
air permits and water use or discharge permits from the state environmental commission, and zoning and building permits from local
commissions.
Regulated utilities are required to obtain a certificate of public
convenience and necessity from the relevant PUC for the construction of generation, transmission and distribution facilities that will
be subject to cost-base rate regulation. No federal certificate of public convenience or necessity is required from FERC for the siting
and construction of electric generation, transmission or distribution
facilities under Part II of the FPA.
However, a FERC licence must be obtained under part I of the
FPA for the construction of hydroelectric facilities on navigable
waters. Construction affecting federal lands may also require authorisation from agencies such as the Bureau of Land Management, the
US Forest Service or the National Park Service.
The US Army Corps
of Engineers reviews projects affecting wetlands or navigable waters.
Nuclear facilities must be licensed by the US Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC).
4
interconnection policies
What are the policies with respect to interconnection of generation to
the transmission grid?
FERC jurisdictional transmission providers are required to provide
interconnection service under the terms of an open access transmission tariff (OATT). Generators have the right to request interconnection services separately from transmission services.
In response to complaints by generators that interconnection
procedures were being used by some transmission providers in a
discriminatory manner, FERC implemented rules to standardise
agreements and procedures for generators and required FERC jurisdictional transmission providers to interconnect generators to the
grid in a non-discriminatory manner. Under the standard inter-connection procedures, generators are required to pay the full cost of any
interconnection facilities up front (from the generator to the point
of interconnection) and network transmission facilities (beyond the
point of interconnection) necessary to connect the generator with the
transmission grid.
The generator is reimbursed for the cost of any
network transmission facilities through credits for future transmission service on the grid. ISOs and RTOs, but not vertically integrated
utilities, have the flexibility to propose changes to the standard interconnection agreement and procedures as well as to the procedures
for recovering interconnection costs. For example, ISOs and RTOs
may seek authorisation to allocate the costs of network upgrades
to the generator requesting the upgrades (in exchange for granting
capacity rights on the transmission system).
FERC does not regulate
189
. United StateS
local distribution facilities, but has authority to regulate the rates,
terms and conditions of any wholesale sales transaction using such
a facility.
5
alternative energy sources
Does government policy or legislation encourage power generation
based on alternative energy sources such as renewable energies or
combined heat and power?
Yes. Legislation passed and signed into law by the president in early
2009, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act), contains provisions for direct spending, tax credits and
loan guarantee programmes designed to promote development of
renewable energy projects. The legislation extended the production
tax credit (PTC) on renewable energy systems by three years, while
offering expansions on and alternatives for PTCs (www.ucsusa.org/
clean_energy/solutions/big_picture_solutions/production-tax-creditfor.html). The wind energy PTC is in effect until 2012, while PTCs
for municipal solid waste, qualified hydropower, biomass and geothermal energy projects extend until 2013.
Solar facilities are eligible
for a 30 per cent Investment Tax Credit, which applies through 2016.
As an alternative to the PTC, a project developer may elect a grant
equal to 30 per cent of the facility’s tax basis, so long as the facility is
depreciable and amortisable. The DoE is administering a loan guarantee programme for renewable energy projects that begin construction by 30 September 2011 (http://lpo.energy.gov/?page_id=45). The
DoE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy is the focal
point for several additional alternative energy programmes, including
the biomass programme, the geothermal technologies programme,
the solar energies technologies programme, the hydrogen, fuel cells
and infrastructure technologies programme, and the wind and hydropower technologies programme (www.eere.energy.gov/#).
As of March 2009, 28 states plus the District of Columbia have
adopted renewable portfolio standards (RPS) that require electricity providers to obtain a minimum percentage of their power from
renewable energy resources by a certain date and five others have
set voluntary goals for adopting renewable energy resources (www.
epa.gov/chp/state-policy/renewable_fs.html).
Thirteen of these states
include combined heat and power (CHP) or waste heat recovery as
an eligible resource. More than 2,300MW of new renewable energy
capacity through 2003 was attributable to RPS programmes (www.
epa.gov/chp/state-policy/renewable_fs.html#fn3).
Cogeneration and small power production purchase and sale
requirements
EPAct 2005 amended the mandatory purchase and sale requirements
of PURPA. Historically, electric utilities were obligated to purchase or
sell electric energy from or to a facility that is an existing qualifying
cogeneration or small power production facility (QF).
However, if
the QF is selling in a market that meets certain criteria established by
FERC, that purchase obligation may be terminated. In 2006 FERC
issued Order No. 688, which permits the termination of the requirement that an electric utility enter into new contracts to sell energy to
or purchase energy from a QF after the electric utility files for such
relief from FERC, and FERC makes appropriate findings.
Several
utilities have successfully pursued relief under Order No. 688. These
changes do not affect existing or pending contracts or obligations.
6
Climate change
What impact will government policy on climate change have on the
types of resources that are used to meet electricity demand and on
the cost and amount of power that is consumed?
Federal and state climate change policies promoting carbon-free
energy sources are more likely to have an impact on the types of
resource used to meet US electricity demand in the medium- or
long-term time frame than in the short term.
The US electric
190
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
industry’s reliance on fossil fuels (particularly coal) to meet rising
energy demands is driven primarily by cost considerations: coal is a
cheap and plentiful domestic fuel source, and coal-fired power plants
are a relatively quickly built and inexpensive means by which utilities can meet the electricity demands of their customers. Although
recent federal and state legislative initiatives have provided downpayments toward the creation of cost-competitive renewable energy
technologies, the large-scale deployment of these technologies is
still hampered by variability of resources such as wind, the need for
additional backbone transmission capacity between regions, and the
lack of storage capacity. Other proposed state and federal legislation (eg, cap-and-trade schemes) and foreign policy initiatives (eg,
the Copenhagen emissions treaty) could impose additional costs on
electricity generators using carbon-rich fossil fuels.
New and existing coal-fired plants may be incentivised or required to have carbon
capture and sequestration (CCS) capabilities. Federal and state initiatives to encourage carbon-free energy resources could incentivise
other alternatives to coal – particularly new liquefied natural gas
(LNG) and nuclear. Coal and other fossil fuels are nonetheless likely
to represent the major share of resources for electric energy in the US
for the next few decades.
These legislative proposals are, however, likely to impose greater
costs on the energy that is consumed.
State or federal governments
could subsidise renewable energy and carbon mitigation initiatives
by surcharges on electricity generation or consumption. Compliance
costs incurred by utilities arising from domestic or international
cap-and-trade legislation, EPA regulation of greenhouse gasses as
airborne pollutants under the Clean Air Act, or state regulation of
vehicular carbon emissions would be passed on through every transaction involving electricity. Moreover, these increased costs to utilities
and consumers would not likely result in significant demand -reduction; even the most optimistic experts conclude that conservation
efforts could realise at best only a marginal reduction of the rate of
increase in US demand for electricity.
7
Government policy
Does government policy encourage development of new nuclear power
plants? How?
Yes.
The US DoE Loan Guarantee Program has promoted development of the nuclear power industry through total available loan
guarantees of US$18.5 billion for the construction of new nuclear
power plants in the US These loan guarantees help developers of new
nuclear plants in the US to obtain favorable financing terms, which
is of critical importance when constructing plants with a projected
price tag in the range of US$7 to US$10 billion per unit. Indeed,
many companies that are considering building new plants have publicly stated that, absent a federal loan guarantee, they will not be able
to finance and build their proposed projects. Seventeen companies
building 21 nuclear units have applied for the guarantees.
To date,
a conditional loan guarantee of US$8.33 billion has been granted to
the developers of two nuclear units in Georgia, and DoE has targeted
two additional projects (in Maryland and Texas) for loan guarantees
covering the remaining US$10.17 billion. However, the Maryland
loan guarantee is in doubt, because in October 2010, the sponsoring
company rejected the terms of the loan proposed by the DoE.
DoE’s Loan Guarantee Program also has earmarked an additional US$4 billion for the construction of new uranium enrichment
facilities in the US. Access to additional supplies of enriched uranium
fuel will be critical to support the development of new nuclear plants
in the US.
The DoE has granted a conditional loan guarantee of US$2
billion for the construction of a uranium enrichment plant in Idaho,
and is considering the loan guarantee application of the United States
Enrichment Corporation, which is planning to construct a new uranium enrichment plant in Ohio.
In addition, DoE’s Nuclear Power 2010 program has helped
to jump-start the proposed construction of new nuclear plants, by
Getting the deal through – electricity Regulation 2011
. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
co-funding with the nuclear industry efforts to evaluate and bring new
technologies to market. This includes utilising the new licensing process established by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) that is
intended to streamline NRC approval of such projects. DoE also has
put in place a Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems initiative, which
aims to develop new plant designs that minimise waste and are safer
and more proliferation-resistant than today’s nuclear plant designs.
Finally, EPAct 2005 has further encouraged the construction of
new nuclear plants by establishing a production tax credit. Under
that plan, operators of the first 6,000MW of capacity from new
nuclear power plants that are placed in service before 2021 will
receive a production tax credit of 1.8 cents per kWh during the first
eight years of the plant’s operation.
Regulation of electricity utilities – transmission
8
authorisations to construct and operate transmission networks
What authorisations are required to construct and operate
transmission networks?
Construction
Construction of transmission facilities is primarily a state-regulated
function, but federal authorities have jurisdiction over siting on federal
lands and multi-state projects may require the authorisation of several
states.
Historically, this fragmented system for siting new power lines,
in addition to other factors such as regulatory uncertainty on the state
and federal levels associated with transmission cost recovery, has been
a significant barrier to the development of new transmission in the
US. The EPAct 2005 provides tools to facilitate new construction and
improvements to the existing transmission infrastructure.
EPAct 2005 directed the DoE to identify areas in which transmission capacity constraints or congestion adversely affects consumers
(national interest electric transmission corridors) and gave FERC
supplemental permitting authority to ensure timely construction of
transmission facilities to remedy transmission congestion in those
corridors. The DoE has designated two such corridors, the MidAtlantic Area National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor and
the Southwest Area National Interest Electric Transmission Corridor
(http://nietc.anl.gov/nationalcorridor/index.cfm).
Under authority
provided by EPAct 2005, FERC may issue federal permits to construct or modify electric transmission facilities if it finds that states
are holding up transmission projects in these corridors.
EPAct 2005 also provides a mechanism for the private use of the
eminent domain power of the US government, where necessary, to
obtain property for transmission infrastructure projects. In addition,
EPAct 2005 requires that the federal government identify rights of
way across federal lands that can be made available for siting electric
transmission.
Operation
FERC issued a series of orders beginning with Order No. 890, which
were intended to eliminate the broad discretion that transmission
providers had in calculating available transfer capacity (ATC),
increasing non-discriminatory access to the grid and ensuring that
customers are treated fairly in seeking alternative power supplies.
Since Order No.
890-A, transmission providers have implemented
new service options for long-term firm point-to-point customers and
adopted modifications to other services. Instead of denying a longterm request for point-to-point service because as little as one hour of
service is unavailable in the course of a year, transmission providers
are now required to consider their ability to offer a modified form
of planning redispatch or a new conditional firm option to accommodate the request. This increases opportunities to utilise transmission efficiently by eliminating artificial barriers to use of the grid.
This standardisation reduces the potential for undue discrimination,
increases transparency, and reduces confusion in the industry that
resulted from the prior lack of consistency.
www.gettingthedealthrough.com
United StateS
Also, FERC regulations require the posting of ATC values associated with a particular path, not available flowgate capacity values
associated with a flowgate.
With respect to energy and generation
imbalance charges, a transmission provider must post the availability of generator imbalance service and seek imbalance service from
other sources in a manner that is reasonable in light of the transmission provider’s operations and the needs of its imbalance customers.
FERC also limited rollover rights to contracts with a minimum term
of five years. In Order No. 890-B, FERC reiterated that a power
purchase agreement must meet all of the requirements for designation as a network resource in order to be designated by the network
customer or transmission provider’s merchant functions.
9
eligibility to obtain transmission services
Who is eligible to obtain transmission services and what requirements
must be met to obtain access?
See question 10.
10 Government incentives
Are there any government incentives to encourage expansion of the
transmission grid?
Pursuant to EPAct 2005, FERC has established incentive-based rate
treatments to encourage investment in and expansion of the US’
aging transmission infrastructure.
FERC Order No. 679, issued in
2007, includes a number of key provisions to promote transmission
investment, including:
• incentive rates of return on equity for new investment by public
utilities (both traditional utilities and stand-alone transmission
companies);
• a higher rate of return on equity for utilities that join or continue to be members of transmission organisations (for example,
RTOs and ISOs); and
• various advantageous accounting methods, including:
• full recovery of prudently incurred construction work in progress,
pre-operation costs and costs of abandoned facilities;
• use of hypothetical capital structures;
• accumulated deferred income taxes for stand-alone trans-mission
companies;
• adjustments to book value for stand-alone transmission company sales or purchases;
• accelerated depreciation; and
• deferred cost recovery for utilities with retail rate freezes.
In Order No. 679 and Order No.
679-A, FERC extended incentive
rate treatments to all utilities joining ISOs or RTOs, irrespective of
the date they join. However, this incentive does not apply to existing
transmission rate base that has already been built, as its purpose is
to attract new investment in transmission.
11 Rates and terms for transmission services
Who determines the rates and terms for the provision of transmission
services and what legal standard does that entity apply?
FERC has jurisdiction over unbundled transmission services (including transmission services provided over low-voltage facilities) provided by public utilities to wholesale customers or to retail customers
with direct access. The states have jurisdiction over bundled retail
service (ie, a combined generation and delivery product sold to retail
customers) where direct access is not available.
Court decisions and
the interconnectivity of the transmission grid in the continental US
have led to an expansive view of what constitutes transmission service
in interstate commerce in all areas of the US except Alaska, Hawaii
and ERCOT. The FPA, however, reserves to the states jurisdiction
over the local distribution of electricity.
191
. United StateS
FERC jurisdictional utilities offering transmission services
must do so under FERC-approved tariffs. Order No. 888 required
jurisdictional electric utilities to submit pro forma OATTs that functionally unbundled transmission operations and services, and set
forth rates for transmission and ancillary services. In 2007, FERC
issued Order No.
890, which modified the pro forma OATT to better remedy undue discrimination by, among other things, providing
greater transparency and consistency in the calculation of available
transmission capacity, and requiring coordinated open transmission
planning between regions.
Transmission providers are also required to maintain an
open-access, same-time information system (OASIS) to publish information with respect to its transmission system, including services,
rates, and available transmission capacity as well as business rules,
practices, and standards that relate to transmission services provided
under the pro forma OATT.
Finally, the FPA empowers FERC to review rates and terms of
transmission services to ensure that they are just and reasonable
and not unduly discriminatory or preferential. Generally, tariffs and
contracts for transmission services must be filed with FERC before
service commences to allow an opportunity for Commission review,
as well as public notice and comment. Because transmission services
are a natural monopoly, Order No.
888 envisions that FERC will
determine whether a particular tariff is just and reasonable via a
traditional cost-of-service ratemaking inquiry that balances ratepayer
and the utilities’ financial interests to realise a rate within the zone of
reasonableness. Tariffs can be challenged for being unjust, unreasonable, unlawful, or discriminatory.
EPAct 2005 authorises FERC to require transmission providers
not subject to its jurisdiction to provide open access to their transmission system at terms and conditions comparable to those the unregulated entity provides to itself. An unregulated entity may be exempt
from this requirement if it sells less than 4 million MWh of electricity
annually or if it does not own or operate the transmission facilities
needed to operate an interconnected system.
However, many of these
regulated entities already provide open access based on reciprocity
agreements with transmission providers.
12 entities responsible for assuring reliability
Which entities are responsible for assuring reliability of the
transmission grid and what are their powers and responsibilities?
Since 1968, NERC has operated as the primary entity responsible
for assuring the reliability of the grid. NERC develops reliability
standards through an American National Standards Institute accredited process, and it monitors, assesses and enforces its members’
compliance with such standards through a voluntary, self-regulatory
process. EPAct 2005 added section 215 to the FPA, which provides
for the creation of an ERO to be the organisation responsible for
establishing and enforcing reliability standards for the bulk power
system in North America.
In 2006, FERC certified NERC as the
ERO. The ERO oversees an enforcement programme that includes
compliance audit and reliability readiness review programmes, as
well as a -compliance-monitoring programme.
In 2007, FERC strengthened the reliability regime by approving 83 mandatory reliability standards for the bulk power system
proposed by the ERO, approving delegation agreements between the
ERO and eight regional entities and creating a new internal Office
of Electric Reliability. The mandatory reliability standards apply to
users, owners, and operators of the bulk power system designated by
NERC.
Both monetary and non-monetary penalties may be imposed
for violations of these standards.
192
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Regulation of electricity utilities – distribution
13 authorisation to construct and operate distribution networks
What authorisations are required to construct and operate distribution
networks?
Similar to generation, distribution is regulated primarily at the state
level.
14 access to the distribution grid
Who is eligible to obtain access to the distribution grid and what
requirements must be met to obtain access?
Specific procedures for connection to the distribution grid vary from
state to state. However, state laws generally provide that distributors
cannot deny service that is in the public interest.
15 Rates and terms for distribution services
Who determines the rates or terms for the provision of distribution
services and what legal standard does that entity apply?
FERC has jurisdiction over delivery of electric energy in interstate
commerce by public utilities, regardless of the voltage level of the
delivery facilities. Section 201 of the FPA reserves regulatory authority over all facilities used in the local distribution of electricity to the
state utility commissions, however.
FERC in Order No. 888 promulgated a seven-factor functional test for the case-by-case determination of the jurisdictional separation between FERC-jurisdictional
interstate transmission service (including service over low-voltage
distribution lines) and state-jurisdictional local distribution service,
and FERC generally defers to the states’ application of this test.
The functional test looks at; the proximity of the facilities to
retail customers; whether the facilities are radial in character; whether
power flows into or out of the facilities; whether power entering
the facilities is transported to another market; whether power is
consumed in a defined area; whether the facilities include meters to
measure power flow into the facilities; and the voltage of the power
flowing through the facilities.
FERC determines the rates, terms and conditions of transmission service in interstate commerce (including service over low-voltage facilities) under the FPA’s just and reasonable standard based
on cost-of-service ratemaking principles. Where retail customers
buy electricity from a wholesale provider, and the electricity is then
delivered over distribution facilities by the load serving entity, the
state determines the rates, terms and conditions of such distribution
service.
Because distribution services are considered to be a natural
monopoly, state public utility commissions generally review tariffs
for distribution services proposed by the utilities via a traditional
cost-of-service ratemaking inquiry. State utility commissions generally approve the tariffs submitted by utilities if they are just and
reasonable. The tariffs offered by various utilities will typically vary,
even within a state.
Regulation of electricity utilities – sales of power
16 approval to sell power
What authorisations are required for the sale of power to customers
and which authorities grant such approvals?
FERC has jurisdiction over sales of power at wholesale in interstate
commerce other than sales by federal or state governmental bodies
and rural cooperatives that are indebted to the Rural Utilities Service
(RUS) or cooperatives that sell less than 4 million MWh of electricity
per year.
Retail sales of electricity are regulated at the state level, with
variation from state to state.
Getting the deal through – electricity Regulation 2011
. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
17 Power sales tariffs
Is there any tariff or other regulation regarding power sales?
Tariffs and contracts pursuant to which public utilities sell power
generally must be filed with FERC (wholesale sales) or the applicable state PUC (retail sales) before service commences to allow the
applicable regulatory entity an opportunity for review (and for public
notice and comment). Under the FPA, FERC has jurisdiction over
wholesale rate-making and is charged with assuring the rates, terms
and conditions pursuant to which public utilities offer wholesale
power sales are ‘just and reasonable’.
FERC permits wholesale sales of power at market-based rates if
the seller demonstrates a lack of market power by passing a series of
horizontal and vertical market screens. FERC has commenced investigations to determine whether utilities should retain their authority
to sell power at market-based rates after finding that certain utilities
did not pass at least one of the screening tests. In response, several utilities voluntarily agreed to implement cost-based rate caps in
the areas where FERC found a presumption of market power and
revoked the market-based rate authority of a utility.
Sellers of wholesale power that have applied for and received
FERC approval to sell power pursuant to a market-based rate tariff
can thereafter enter into new power sales contracts and transactions
without filing the contracts prior to commencing service.
Instead,
such sellers file quarterly reports of their power sales contracts and
transactions under their market-based rate tariff. In the absence of
a showing of a lack of market power, FERC regulates the rates for
wholesale sales under cost-of-service rate-making principles, and
each new contract must be filed with FERC before the commencement of service.
Unlike the situation with respect to transmission tariffs, FERC
does not generally dictate specific non-price terms and conditions in
wholesale power sales contracts but does dictate specific non-price
terms and conditions in the market-based rate tariff. The regulatory structure allows complaints to be filed challenging contracts
or reported power sales transactions as being unjust, unreasonable,
unlawful or discriminatory.
Retail sales are regulated at the state level, with significant variation from state to state.
In the absence of a competitive retail market,
retail rates are typically established based on cost of service.
18 Rates for wholesale of power
Who determines the rates for sales of wholesale power and what
standard does that entity apply?
Section 201 of the FPA grants FERC exclusive regulatory authority
over the wholesale of electricity in interstate commerce by jurisdictional entities. The state utility commissions retain regulatory authority over wholesale sales of electricity by purely intrastate wholesale
sales (in practice this class is limited to wholesale sales in Alaska,
Hawaii and ERCOT), as well as wholesale sales by non-jurisdictional
entities such as rural electric cooperatives, municipal utilities, and
state- or federally created utilities.
The FPA grants FERC authority over all jurisdictional wholesale
sales of electricity to ensure that wholesale rates are just, reasonable
and not unduly discriminatory or preferential. Although traditionally FERC had employed a cost-of-service ratemaking inquiry when
reviewing wholesale rates to realise this statutory mandate, FERC has
also allowed the market to determine wholesale power rates where
it has found that the seller and its affiliates lack or have mitigated
vertical or horizontal market power, and have adequately restricted
affiliate transactions with captive customers.
Once FERC approves
a jurisdictional entity’s generic market tariff, the jurisdictional entity
is free to negotiate with other parties in the marketplace over the
specific rate charged for the wholesale sale without having to seek
FERC approval of the agreement prior to commencing service.
www.gettingthedealthrough.com
United StateS
19 Public service obligations
To what extent are electricity utilities that sell power subject to public
service obligations?
At retail level, electric utilities have traditionally operated under an
obligation to serve. In exchange for what is generally an exclusive
service territory and an opportunity to recover prudently incurred
expenses through cost-based rates, utilities are obliged to provide
service to all customers in that service territory, as well as to plan
adequately for the future needs of customers. In states that adopt
retail competition, certain electric utilities may still retain an obligation to provide service to customers who do not select a competitive
supplier.
FERC has recognised that wholesale electricity sales are generally
governed by private contract, rather than by regulatory order or an
express obligation to serve.
Regulatory authorities
20 Policy setting
Which authorities determine regulatory policy with respect to the
electricity sector?
A number of governmental agencies are involved in different aspects
of the regulatory policies governing electricity.
At the federal level,
Congress ultimately determines the direction of national energy policy through legislation, but it delegates broad authority to implement
legislative mandates to FERC and other administrative agencies. At
the state level, electric utilities are regulated by PUCs.
21 Scope of authority
What is the scope of each regulator’s authority?
FERC has authority to regulate sales of wholesale power and transmission in interstate commerce and to grant and administer licenses
for hydroelectric plants on navigable waters. Under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005 (PUHCA 2005), FERC also has
authority to grant exempt wholesale generator (EWG) status and
foreign utility company (FUCO) status.
FERC exercises authority
under PURPA with respect to qualifying small power production
facilities and cogeneration facilities (QFs).
FERC has jurisdiction over the disposition of assets subject to its
jurisdiction, including through mergers, asset divestitures, corporate
reorganisations and other transactions in which there is a change in
the control of jurisdictional assets. FERC also has oversight authority with respect to the issuance of securities (except if regulated by
a state) and interlocks among the officers and directors of public
utilities and financial institutions, or the utility’s suppliers of electrical
equipment. Public utilities under FERC’s jurisdiction are subject to
various requirements with respect to accounting and record retention
and are required to satisfy various reporting requirements.
Under PUHCA 2005, FERC has increased oversight over, and
access to, the books and records of public utility holding companies
and their subsidiaries and affiliates to the extent that such books
and records pertain to FERC jurisdictional rates or charges.
Any
service company in a holding company system providing non-power
goods and services to an affiliated FERC jurisdictional public utility
or natural gas company must file annual reports disclosing detailed
information about their businesses. Public utility holding companies
may seek exemptions and waivers from these regulatory requirements. However, an automatic exemption from all of the requirements is available to companies that are holding companies solely
with respect to ownership of EWGs, QFs or FUCOs.
In addition, single-state holding companies are entitled to a waiver from some, but
not all, of the requirements but must seek the waiver from FERC.
The NRC licenses the construction and operation of nuclear
power plants and other nuclear facilities to ensure the protection of
public health and safety. The Atomic Energy Act (AEA) governs the
193
. United StateS
use of nuclear materials by both military and civilian entities, requires
that all nuclear facilities be licensed, and establishes compensation
for, and limits damages arising from, nuclear accidents. The NRC has
developed detailed regulations and guidelines concerning all aspects
of the operations of a nuclear power plant.
State PUCs regulate terms and rates for retail sales and delivery
of electricity. PUCs are charged with ensuring that the public has
access to safe, reliable utility service at reasonable rates and, thus,
also have authority over at least some aspects of the organisation and
finances of public utilities. Many PUCs also have authority to make
siting decisions for transmission lines and generation facilities.
However, in other states, siting decisions are delegated to other agencies.
Many local governments operate municipal utilities to provide electric service to their local communities. While the majority
of municipal utilities serve smaller communities, several large cities, for example, Los Angeles, Sacramento, San Antonio, Seattle,
Jacksonville and Orlando, operate publicly owned electric utilities.
City councils govern nearly three-fifths of municipal utilities, while
boards of elected or appointed officials govern the rest. In a few
states, PUCs regulate municipal utilities.
The RUS promotes electrification of rural America by providing
financing to local cooperatives.
Electric cooperatives are governed by
their member customers through an elected board of directors. Cooperative boards set rates as well as determining the types of services
available and other policies. PUCs regulate some aspects of cooperatives’ activities in approximately 20 of the 47 states in which cooperatives operate.
Rural cooperatives with loans outstanding from the
RUS are also obliged to comply with various loan covenants and
regulations that affect their operations. The TVA, formed in 1933 as
a wholly owned corporation of the US government, generates and
transmits power in seven south-eastern states. TVA is governed by a
three-member board, appointed by the president and confirmed by
the Senate to serve staggered nine-year terms.
The four federal power marketing administrations (PMAs) operate as agencies of the DoE and sell approximately 6.6 per cent of the
nation’s electricity in 30 states (they are the Bonneville, Southeastern,
Southwestern and Western Area Power Administrations – the Alaska
Power Administration was privatised in 1998).
The PMAs do not
own or operate generating facilities but market the power produced
by federally owned hydro and nuclear facilities. Administrators of
the PMAs have authority to set rates and must certify that rates are
‘consistent with applicable law’ and ‘the lowest possible rate to customers consistent with sound business principles’.
22 establishment of regulators
How is each regulator established and to what extent is it considered
to be independent of the regulated business and of governmental
officials?
FERC and NRC are each authorised to have five commissioners.
The president nominates, and Congress confirms, commissioners for
FERC and the NRC for staggered five-year terms. The president also
appoints one commissioner to serve as chair of each commission.
No
more than three commissioners may belong to a single political party.
Furthermore, FERC and NRC decisions are not subject to review by
the president, congress, the DoE or other agencies.
State PUCs vary in size, but generally have between three and
seven commissioners. It is common to limit the number of commissioners who may be from a single political party. In most states, the
governor appoints commissioners, with approval by the upper house
of the state legislature, for staggered five or six-year terms.
In some
states, commissioners are elected. The governor typically designates
one commissioner to serve as chair of the commission, although in
some states the commissioners select the chair. State commissioners
generally are subject to restrictions similar to those of their federal
counterparts with respect to employment, investments and ex parte
communications.
194
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
23 Challenge and appeal of decisions
To what extent can decisions of the regulator be challenged or
appealed, and to whom? What are the grounds and procedures for
appeal?
Decisions by FERC can be challenged on both substantive and procedural grounds.
Within 30 days of a final decision or order by FERC,
a party to the proceeding (either the applicant or an intervenor) may
file a request for rehearing with FERC. Within 60 days of issuance of
the decision on rehearing, an aggrieved party may request a review of
the FERC decisions by a US Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals
generally will not consider any objections not raised in the request
for rehearing to FERC.
US Supreme Court review is possible upon a
showing of compelling cause (for example, a conflict between decisions of two or more circuits of the US Court of Appeals). PUC
decisions can also be challenged through judicial appeals in state
courts, or if the decision violates federal law, a cause of action could
be brought in federal court (subject to various limitations).
Acquisition and merger control – competition
24 Responsible bodies
Which bodies have the authority to approve or block mergers or other
changes in control over businesses in the sector or acquisition of
utility assets?
FERC approval is required prior to the disposition of any facilities
subject to its jurisdiction under the FPA of a value in excess of US$10
million, as well as direct or indirect mergers or consolidations of public utility facilities with those of any other person regardless of the
value of the facilities. Facilities under FERC’s jurisdiction under section 203 of the FPA include facilities used for transmission or sale of
electric power in interstate commerce (including ‘paper facilities’ such
as contracts for wholesale power sales) as well as generation assets
used for wholesale sales.
FERC review is required if there is a change
in ‘control’ of jurisdictional facilities. In general, FERC will presume
that a transfer of less than 10 per cent of a public utility’s holdings is
not a transfer of control.
Any holding company that owns an entity selling power at wholesale or transmitting electric energy must obtain FERC authorisation
to acquire securities valued in excess of US$10 million in any entity
that sells at wholesale or transmits electric energy or to otherwise
merge with any such entity with a value in excess of US$10 million.
In addition, the transfer of specific assets or licences may necessitate
additional reviews. For example, the transfer of a nuclear generating
facility requires NRC approval.
FERC has established blanket authorisations for a variety of
transactions.
For example, transactions in which a holding company
that includes a transmitting utility or an electric utility seeks to acquire
or take any security of a transmitting utility or company that owns,
operates or controls only facilities used solely for transmission in intrastate commerce or sales of electric energy in intrastate commerce,
or facilities used solely for local distribution or sales of electricity at
retail, are automatically authorised. Transactions involving internal
corporate reorganisations that do not present cross--subsidisation
issues or involve a traditional public utility with captive customers
or that owns transmission assets are also automatically authorised.
Acquisitions by holding companies of non-voting securities do not
require prior FERC authorisation. Acquisitions by holding companies
of voting securities do not require prior FERC authorisation if, after
the acquisition, the acquiring holding company will directly or indirectly own less than 10 per cent of the outstanding voting securities.
Moreover, acquisitions by holding companies of foreign utility companies do not require FERC authorisation except where the holding
company or its affiliates has captive customers in the US, in which
case the holding company must make certain representations that the
transaction will not adversely affect such captive customers.
Getting the deal through – electricity Regulation 2011
.
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Antitrust Division
of the Department of Justice (DoJ) (collectively, the antitrust agencies)
are the primary agencies with authority to enforce US antitrust and
fair trade practice laws. The antitrust agencies can review the antitrust
implications of proposed mergers and certain acquisitions of assets or
securities in the electricity sector under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (HSR Act). Their authority is not
specific to any one industry, but they, in addition to FERC and the
states, may challenge in court anti-competitive practices in the electricity sector. The antitrust agencies’ authority comes from laws including
the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act
(FTCA), the Clayton Act and the Sherman Act.
Finally, individual state regulatory bodies often must approve an
acquisition or divestiture of utility companies or assets in that state,
pursuant to state law.
The procedures and standards for that review
vary from one state to another.
25 Review of transfers of control
What criteria and procedures apply with respect to the review of
mergers, acquisitions and other transfers of control? How long does it
typically take to obtain a decision approving or blocking the transaction?
In considering an application to merge, acquire or transfer control of
assets under section 203 of the FPA, FERC must determine whether
the proposed transaction is in the public interest. As provided in
FERC’s merger policy statement in Order No. 592, such determination requires an evaluation of the proposal’s effect on competition,
rates and regulation.
FERC must also consider whether proposed
acquisitions will result in cross-subsidisation of any non-utility company in the same holding company system or in any pledge of utility
assets for the benefit of any company in the same holding company
system. FERC may approve an acquisition resulting in such crosssubsidisation or pledge of utility assets only if FERC determines that
such cross-subsidisation or pledge will be consistent with the public
interest.
With respect to assessing a proposed transaction’s impact on competition under section 203 of the FPA, FERC’s merger policy statement generally requires that applicants provide it with a competitive
screen analysis (horizontal or vertical, as appropriate) showing the
effect of the proposed disposition on relevant products in relevant
geographical markets. The competitive screen analysis must:
• identify the relevant products (such as economic capacity and
available economic capacity) and the geographical markets in
which the competitive effects of the acquisition can be analysed;
• determine the market shares of all participating firms and the
degree of concentration in the market, both before and after the
proposed acquisition; and
• identify the market characteristics that will influence the ability
of the combining entities to adversely affect competition, such as
barriers to entry into the relevant market by other firms.
Market power is measured In part using the Herfindahl-Hirschman
Index (HHI) measure of market concentration.
However, note that
the new Horizontal Merger Guidelines released 19 August 2010 by
the DoJ and FTC reflect the measure’s declining role In merger analysis. The revised guidelines raise the HHI thresholds for determining
market concentration, making It less likely for a particular market
to be deemed “moderately concentrated” or “highly concentrated”
based on HHI alone. Since FERC’s Appendix A horizontal electric
utility merger analysis closely tracks the previous DoJ/FTC guidelines,
some expect FERC’s merger analysis to be similarly revised.
FERC currently evaluates both the magnitude of increases in
market power and overall post-transaction concentrations of market
power to identify those transactions that are likely to have an adverse
impact on competition.
Applicants, however, are allowed to identify
in their analysis other factors that may help to negate the presumption, such as benefits that the proposed acquisition will bring.
www.gettingthedealthrough.com
United StateS
FERC will provide expedited consideration of completed applications for approval of: transactions that are not contested, do not
involve mergers and are consistent with FERC precedent, as well as
uncontested transactions involving a disposition of only transmission
facilities under the functional control of a FERC-approved RTO or
ISO; transactions that do not require a competitive screen analysis;
and internal corporate reorganisations that do not present cross-subsidisation issues. For transactions that do not qualify for such expedited action, FERC is required to act within 180 days after the filing
of an application, unless FERC determines there is good cause for
requiring additional time, in which case the time for action may be
extended up to 180 days. For example, FERC might extend the time
frame for action if it finds that an evidentiary hearing is needed to
determine whether the transaction is in the public interest.
The antitrust agencies may review the antitrust implications of
mergers and certain acquisitions of assets or securities before those
transactions are consummated under the HSR Act.
The FTC promulgated a set of detailed rules which govern the pre-merger notification
that must be filed in connection with such a transaction. A transaction subject to the HSR Act may not close prior to the expiration of
the applicable waiting period, which is initially 30 days. If the antitrust agency decides to open a second-phase investigation, the waiting period will be extended until the 30th day following substantial
compliance with a second request.
If the reviewing antitrust agency
determines that the transaction may harm competition in a relevant
market, it may seek a preliminary injunction in a federal court which
would bar the consummation of the merger until the court (in a DoJ
action) or the FTC (in an FTC action) has an opportunity to decide
whether to seek a permanent injunction following a full trial. Such
a preliminary injunction does not issue automatically; in deciding
whether to preliminarily enjoin a merger, the courts give heavy consideration to whether the antitrust agency will eventually be able to
prove its case at trial.
If the reviewing antitrust agency determines that the transaction may harm competition in a relevant market, such issues must
be resolved before the transaction can proceed. In the electric sector,
FERC (not the antitrust agencies) generally takes the lead in addressing any anti-competitive issues presented by a proposed transaction.
Under the HSR Act, however, merging entities in such a situation
often enter into a consent order with an antitrust agency under which
the acquiring company agrees to divest a portion of its existing assets
or of the assets it will be acquiring.
Finally, individual state regulatory bodies often must approve an
acquisition or divestiture of utility companies or assets in that state,
pursuant to state law.
The procedures and standards for that review
vary from one state to another.
26 Prevention and prosecution of anti-competitive practices
Which authorities have the power to prevent or prosecute anticompetitive or manipulative practices in the electricity sector?
The federal agencies that are primarily concerned with anticompetitive practices in the wholesale electricity sector are FTC, DoJ, FERC
and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). State utility commissions and attorneys general generally, but not exclusively,
focus on such practices in the retail electric sector.
27 determination of anti-competitive conduct
What substantive standards are applied to determine whether conduct
is anti-competitive or manipulative?
FERC enforces compliance with tariffs or contracts in an effort to
assure service is ‘non-discriminatory’ and charges are ‘just and reasonable’. EPAct 2005 amended the FPA to prohibit buyers or sellers of interstate wholesale electric energy or transmission services
from knowingly providing a federal agency with false information
or from using any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance in
195
.
United StateS
violation of FERC regulations. Further, a seller of electric products and services applying for market-based rate authority must
show it does not possess unmitigated market power in the affected
markets.
FERC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)
(which has enforcement authority under the Commodity Exchange
Act) have coordinated their efforts to combat manipulation attempts
in the energy market. This coordination was recently seen in 2007,
where FERC and the CFTC separately brought cases against two
natural gas distributors.
The FTC has concurrent authority, pursuant to the FTCA, to
enjoin ‘unfair methods of competition.’ The FTC’s authority extends
to acquisitions that tend to substantially lessen competition, as well as
to price discrimination and other anti-competitive actions. The FTC
also has authority to directly protect consumers from any ‘unfair or
deceptive’ practice, defined as an act ‘that causes or is likely to cause
substantial injury to consumers that is not reasonably avoidable by
consumers themselves and not outweighed by countervailing benefits
to consumers and to competition’.
The FTC and the DoJ have concurrent power to prosecute violations of the other federal antitrust statutes.
States and private parties
may also bring actions under federal and state antitrust laws.
Section 1 of the Sherman Act prohibits ‘agreements, conspiracies
or trusts in restraint of trade’. Under the Sherman Act, some agreements (such as agreements of horizontal price-fixing or territorial
division) are determined to be per se illegal because the conduct of
the agreement is overwhelmingly considered to be harmful. Other
agreements that might be harmful but not necessarily are analysed
under the rule of reason, requiring the plaintiff to prove that the
-agreement caused economic harm.
Section 2 of the Sherman Act
prohibits monopolies, specifically targeting anti-competitive conduct
that creates or maintains market domination. The Clayton Act bars
certain types of price discrimination and tying arrangements when
they lessen competition.
28 Preclusion and remedy of anti-competitive practices
What authority does the regulator (or regulators) have to preclude or
remedy anti-competitive or manipulative practices?
If a proposed tariff or contract is found by FERC to be unjust and
unreasonable, FERC will order mitigating revisions. FERC may
require the sellers to refund the difference between the rates collected
and the rates FERC determines are just and reasonable, beginning
with the date the investigation was initiated.
In order for a seller to
be eligible to sell wholesale at market-based rates (instead of at costbased rates), it must demonstrate to FERC that it and its affiliates
lack (or have mitigated) market power. FERC can refuse to grant
market-based rate (MBR) authority to an applicant that fails to show
it does not possess market power. At any point, FERC has the authority to revoke market-based rate authority upon a determination that
the seller possesses market power.
In addition, FERC maintains the
ability to revoke prior grants of MBR authority if the company’s
behaviour involves fraud, deception or misrepresentation.
Once initially granted MBR authority, sellers are required to
take additional measures in order to maintain the market-based rate
authority. For example, sellers of more than 500MW of generation
in any region of the country must file updates every three years in
order to demonstrate its continued lack of market power. Also, such
a electrical provider must notify FERC within 30 days of any significant change that might affect its qualification for market-based rates.
Further, FERC has enacted market behaviour rules in order to govern
sellers’ conduct in the wholesale market.
These rules address unit
operations, communications, price reporting and record retention.
On an ongoing basis, FERC has authority under section 206 of
the FPA to regulate markets and protect them against anticompetitive activity. Section 206 grants FERC authority to initiate an investigation, upon its own motion or third-party complaint, regarding
196
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
whether any rate charged by a utility for any transmission or sale is
‘unjust, unreasonable, unduly discriminatory or preferential’.
EPAct 2005 amended the FPA to allow for increases in the maximum penalty amounts for violations of the FPA. FERC is now able
to assess civil penalties and fines of up to US$1 million or imprisonment for not more than five years, or both, for wilful and knowing
violations, through acts or omissions, of any section of the FPA.
Also,
EPAct 2005 provides for civil penalties of up to US$1 million per
violation per day to be assessed after notice and the opportunity for
a public hearing. While FERC has used its penalty authority sparingly in the past, there are indications that, pursuant to its expanded
authority, FERC will act more forcefully to demonstrate its authority
with more enforcement actions. In 2007, FERC moved to charge two
entities with violations of the FPA, assessing penalties in the amount
of US$297.5 million.
The FTCA authorises the FTC to issue ‘cease and desist’ orders
requiring electric utilities to refrain from prohibited unfair trade practices and may assess civil penalties for violations, up to US$11,000
per violation per day.
Violations of sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman
Act may result in fines up to US$100 million for corporations, or
by imprisonment of up to 10 years, or both. In addition, under the
antitrust acts, private parties are able to bring enforcement actions
to address unfair trade practices in the electric sector, including
tying arrangements, price squeezes and denial of access to essential
facilities.
International
29 acquisitions by foreign companies
Are there any special requirements or limitations on acquisitions of
interests in the electricity sector by foreign companies?
Several current or former US utilities are or have been owned by foreign parties including National Grid USA (owned by UK’s National
Grid), New York State Electricity and Gas (owned by the Spanish
utility, Iberdrola), and LG&E (owned by Germany’s E.ON but sold
to a US company in September, 2010). (formerly owned by Scottish
Power).
However, new investors should be mindful of current US
regulatory and political attitudes toward foreign investment in the
energy sector.
The Exon-Florio amendment to the Defense Production Act
authorises the president of the US to block a transaction if foreign
persons gaining control of a US business that threatened national
security. The recently enacted Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 2007 (FINSA) confirms the broad range of energy and
infrastructure transactions that may be covered, and intensifies the
screening for certain transactions.
Exon-Florio is administered by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the US (CFIUS), an inter-agency committee chaired by the
secretary of the Treasury and including the attorney general and secretaries of homeland security, commerce, defence, state and energy.
CFIUS is responsible for reviewing proposed foreign investment
transactions and making recommendations to the president.
FINSA confirms that Exon-Florio applies to acquisitions of ‘critical infrastructure’. This term has been defined as systems or assets so
vital to the US that the incapacity or destruction of it would have a
debilitating impact on national security.
While the definition has been
applied to ports and oil companies, it is unclear whether or to what
degree electricity generating, transmission or distribution facilities
would be considered critical infrastructure.
FINSA formalises many CFIUS practices, including explicitly
encouraging parties to notify and engage with CFIUS regarding a
transaction in order to seek CFIUS clearance. FINSA provides for
a 30 to 45-day CFIUS review of covered transactions; reviews are
mandatory for covered transactions involving foreign governmentcontrolled entities.
Getting the deal through – electricity Regulation 2011
. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
United StateS
Update and trends
Technologies and devices for electricity storage are receiving
increasing attention in the US. The ability to store energy can provide
important benefits to the electrical grid both as a means of providing
ancillary services to support reliability and as means for direct storage
of electricity produced by renewable resources with intermittent
availability, such as wind and solar. Technologies for electricity
storage are varied and a few, such as pumped storage hydroelectric
technology, are already commercially established.
Many of these technologies are still in development or limited
operational-scale stages, such as compressed air energy storage,
plug-in electric car vehicles and flywheels, and the high costs of the
technologies has not yielded many commercially-viable devices. Some
electricity storage devices, however, participate today in regulation
service markets by providing stored electricity to correct for short-term
changes in demand that could otherwise affect the stability of the
power system. FERC has shown its desire to promote the development
of these technologies.
For nuclear-generating facilities, the Atomic Energy Act (AEA)
generally bars the issuance of a reactor licence to a non-US person.
Situations where a foreign company would be able to hold a licence
include when it owns up to 50 per cent of an entity whose officers and employees responsible for special nuclear materials are US
citizens, or it owns a US subsidiary that will hold the licence, the
foreign company’s stock is ‘largely’ owned by US citizens, and the
subsidiary’s officers and employees responsible for special nuclear
materials are US citizens.
30 Cross-border electricity supply
What rules apply to cross-border electricity supply, especially
interconnection issues?
No electric transmission lines crossing the US international border
may be constructed or operated without a presidential permit. The
secretary of energy (through the DoE’s Office of Electricity Delivery
and Energy Reliability) will issue once a permit upon determining
that the project is in the public interest. The two primary criteria
used to determine if a proposed project is consistent with the public interest are the impact the proposed project would have on the
operating reliability of the US electric power supply, and the environmental consequences of proposed projects. The DoE must also
obtain concurrence from the secretary of state and the secretary of
defence before issuing a permit.
The FPA allows exports of electric energy unless the proposed
export would impair the sufficiency of electric power supply within
the US or would impede or tend to impede the coordinated use of the
US power supply network.
Based on these guidelines from the FPA,
DoE (again through the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy
Reliability) grants authorisation to export electric energy if it -determines that sufficient generating resources exist such that the exporter
could sustain the export while still maintaining adequate generating
resources to meet all firm supply obligations, and the export would
not cause operating parameters on regional transmission systems
to fall outside of established industry criteria. The DoE must also
comply with NEPA before granting authorisation to export electric
energy. No federal permit is required to import electricity into the
US and no federal permit is required to sell imported electricity, if
the sale at issue takes place outside of interstate commerce.
Federal
regulation of a sale for resale in interstate commerce of imported or
domestic electricity will apply if title to the electricity changes hands
at a point within the US. In this case, the seller must apply to FERC
for approval of the rates, terms and conditions of the sale. There
are two exceptions.
First, in the event the sale for resale in interstate commerce of imported or domestic electricity is conducted by
a US government-owned, US state-owned, or US municipally owned
www.gettingthedealthrough.com
In January 2010, FERC authorised ratemaking incentives (see
question 10) for battery storage devices installed on the California
ISO grid to provide voltage support and protection from transmission
overloads. Western Grid Development, LLC, 130 FERC 61,056 (2010).
The novelty of developing electricity storage devices has
presented challenges to regulators. Some electricity storage devices
may have different operational characteristics and multiple uses, and
they may not clearly lend themselves to the traditional classifications
and functions of production, transmission or distribution.
In June, 2010, FERC staff asked for public comment on
appropriate rate structure, accounting classification and reporting
requirements for electricity storage facilities. FERC has received
industry comments, but as of the fall of 2010, has not issued a ruling
or policy statement in response to the filed comments. In September
2010, California passed a law directing the California Public Utilities
Commission to establish targets for utility adoption of cost-effective
energy storage technologies, the first law of its kind in the US.
utility, or is conducted by a US Department of Agriculture Rural
Utilities Service-financed rural electric cooperative, there will be no
FERC regulation of the sale. Second, there will be no FERC regulation of retail sales of imported or domestic electricity. The state PUC
may regulate the retail sales of electricity within its border.
Transactions between affiliates
31 Restrictions
What restrictions exist on transactions between electricity utilities and
their affiliates?
On 16 October 2008, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(FERC) issued Order No.
717, which approves a final rule on standards of conduct governing relations between transmission providers
for both electricity and natural gas and their affiliates. The new rule
represents a retreat to first principles and adopts most if not all of
the changes proposed in a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR)
issued 21 March 2008.
The new rules concentrate on three principles as the way to
prevent affiliate abuse. The main elements of the new regulations
are the independent functioning rule, the no-conduit rule, and the
transparency rule.
independent functioning rule
FERC eliminated completely the concept of energy affiliates as well
as the corporate separation approach to separating grid operators
from marketing affiliates, two aspects of the old Order No.
2004
rules that had proven difficult to understand and enforce. Instead,
the new rules are based on the employee functional approach that
was first utilised in industry restructuring orders from the 1980s and
1990s. This approach focuses on an employee’s actual function on
the job rather than the employee’s position in the organisation chart.
Thus, whereas under the former rules any employee of a marketing
or energy affiliate was prohibited from interacting with transmission function employees, the new rules limit the category of employees who must function independently from transmission operators
to those who are actively and personally engaged on a day-to-day
basis in marketing functions.
By narrowing the focus in this manner,
the new rules provide needed clarity to supervisors, managers, and
executives, and allow the free flow of the type of information needed
for long-term planning.
no-conduit rule
The no-conduit rule prohibits a transmission provider from using
anyone as a conduit for the disclosure of non-public transmission
function information to its marketing function employees. FERC
197
. United StateS
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
believes the no-conduit rule is a critically important part of the new
regulatory scheme and intends for this rule to cover both information
and employees not falling within the scope of the independent functioning rule. For example, although there is no general requirement
that lawyers employed by transmission providers need to function
independently of the company’s marketing function employees, lawyers must nevertheless avoid serving as a conduit for passing nonpublic transmission information to marketing function employees.
In the NOPR, FERC proposed a version of the no-conduit
rule that would have prohibited marketing function employees
from receiving non-public transmission function information from
any source. In response to numerous objections, FERC eliminated
this prohibition from the new regulatory text. But in so doing,
FERC stressed that marketing function employees should remain
vigilant about the possibility of inadvertent disclosures of non-public
transmission information and be prepared to report such incidents
to the company’s chief compliance officer.
transparency rule
The new regulations also contain a new transparency rule, the provisions of which are designed to alert interested persons and FERC to
potential acts of undue preference.
This rule is largely a collection of
the existing public posting and reporting requirements, modified to
conform with the new standards.
Michael S Hindus
Robert a James
Joseph H Fagan
Becky M Bruner
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco
CA 94105
United States
Tel: +1 415 983 1000
Fax: +1 415 983 1200
Reliability exception
Reflecting the importance of reliability, the new rules make an
exception to the independent functioning rule and the no-conduit
rule for the exchange of information ‘pertaining to compliance
with reliability standards approved by the Commission’ and
information ‘necessary to maintain or restore operation of the
transmission system or generating units, or that may affect the
dispatch of generating units’.
32 enforcement and sanctions
Who enforces the restrictions on utilities dealing with affiliates and
what are the sanctions for non-compliance?
FERC has authority to impose penalties in the amount of US$1 million per day per violation under sections 316 and 316A of the FPA or
to use its rate authority to remedy affiliate abuse (as discussed more
fully in question 27).
Mechanisms for enforcement and remedies for violations of
states’ affiliate rules vary.
* he authors would like to thank Deborah A Carrillo, Ada Chen, and
T
Stephen Markus for their assistance in drafting and researching this
chapter.
michael.hindus@pillsburylaw.com
rob.james@pillsburylaw.com
joseph.fagan@pillsburylaw.com
becky.bruner@pillsburylaw.com
2 Houston Center, 909 Fannin Street
Houston
TX 77010
United States
Tel: +1 713 276 7600
Fax: +1 713 276 7673
2300 N Street, NW
Washington
DC 20037
United States
Tel: +1 202 663 8000
Fax: +1 202 663 8007
www.pillsburylaw.com
198
Getting the deal through – electricity Regulation 2011
. il Regulation 2010
. united states
Pillsbury Winthrop shaw Pittman LLP
Oil Regulation 2010
united states
Robert a James, stella dorman and Joseph H Fagan*
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
General
1
Describe, in general terms, the key commercial aspects of the oil
sector in your country.
The US oil industry is divided into three sectors: upstream (exploration and production), midstream (processing, storage and transportation) and downstream (refining, distribution and marketing).
Industry participants are categorised as ‘supermajors’, ‘majors’
and ‘independents’. ‘Supermajors’ are the handful of very large
integrated companies that account for most of the US oil industry
revenues. US-based supermajors include ExxonMobil, Chevron and
ConocoPhillips, whereas the overseas-based supermajors BP and
Shell have substantial US operations. Smaller-scale integrated firms
include Marathon, Hess and Murphy Oil.
A larger number of companies specialise in particular sectors.
The
‘independents’ engage exclusively in upstream activities and include
Occidental, Devon, Anadarko and Apache. Midstream specialists
include El Paso and Kinder Morgan. Refining and marketing operations are conducted by Valero, Sunoco, Tesoro and Western.
The
industry is supported by oil service companies led by Schlumberger,
Halliburton and Baker Hughes, and by a variety of trade associations
including the American Petroleum Institute (API).
US subsidiaries of national oil companies owned or controlled
by foreign governments (NOCs) are important participants in the US
oil industry. For example, Venezuelan-based Petróleos de Venezuela
SA (PDVSA) owns Citgo’s 13,000 retail outlets and interests in three
refineries in the US.
‘Proved reserves’ are estimates of the amount of oil that is reasonably certain to be recoverable from known reservoirs under current
economic and operating conditions. The US ranked eleventh among
nations in proved oil reserves, estimated by the government at 19.1
billion barrels at the end of 2008.
US proved reserves peaked in 1970
and have since declined by 49 per cent. About one-quarter of proved
reserves are located offshore.
As of 2007, the US also has an estimated 177.8 billion barrels of
unproved technically recoverable crude oil, 52 per cent of which is
concentrated in federal land including offshore waters on the Outer
Continental Shelf (OCS). In 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) changed its reporting guidelines for public companies
to permit companies to report probable and possible reserves, as well
as proved reserves.
2
What percentage of your country’s energy needs is covered, directly
or indirectly, by oil as opposed to gas, electricity, nuclear or nonconventional sources? What percentage of the petroleum product
needs of your country is supplied with domestic production? What are
your country’s energy demand and supply trends, especially as they
affect crude oil usage?
In 2008, oil provided an estimated 37 per cent of total US energy
needs, along with coal (23 per cent), natural gas (24 per cent), nuclear
150
(9 per cent) and renewables (7 per cent).
Seventy-one per cent of oil
consumption occurred in the transportation sector, primarily in the
form of gasoline. The industrial sector consumed another 23 per cent
for heating, diesel engines and as petrochemical feedstock. Only 1 per
cent of US power generation is fuelled by oil.
In 2008, the US consumed 19.5 million barrels per day (bbl/d)
of petroleum products.
The US produces approximately 35 per cent
of its total petroleum product needs from domestic sources. Canada,
Mexico, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela collectively provided
62 per cent of US imports.
The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects US
liquid fuels and other petroleum consumption to increase by 0.3 per
cent annually for the next two decades. US crude oil production
peaked in 1970 and has declined 51 per cent since.
Domestic production is nonetheless projected to increase until 2035 as rising world oil
prices spur both onshore and offshore drilling.
Although US energy consumption is projected to continue to
increase over the next 25 years, crude oil as a share of overall energy
is projected by EIA to decrease as a result of federal and state renewable energy programmes and the rising cost of fossil fuels.
3
Does your country have an overarching policy regarding oil-related
activities or a general energy policy?
After 13 years of debate, Congress passed the Energy Policy Act of
2005 (EPAct 2005). The EPAct 2005 made major changes to the
electricity industry (eg, eliminating the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935) and included significant incentives for receipt of
liquefied natural gas (LNG). In addition, the EPAct 2005 included
significant provisions relating to liquid fuels such as incentives for the
production of ethanol, which were as much an agricultural subsidy
as an attempt to reduce dependence on petroleum.
On the heels of the EPAct 2005, Congress passed the Energy
Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA).
The EISA expanded
the renewable fuels standard (RFS) programme initially developed
under the EPAct 2005. EPA’s 2010 regulatory revisions to the annual
renewable fuel standards (RFS2) further expanded the programme
by increasing the volume of renewable fuel required to be blended
into transportation fuel from 12.95 billion gallons in 2010 to 36 billion gallons by 2022. RFS2 also established new specific annual volume standards for cellulosic biofuel, biomass-based diesel, advanced
biofuel and total renewable fuel that must be used in transportation
fuel.
The EISA articulated a national policy aimed at reducing the
country’s carbon footprint and dependence on foreign oil through
the use of renewable fuels.
In January 2009, a new administration took office and brought
with it new policies relating to energy use and production in the
US. The current US president has endorsed certain regulatory and
legislative initiatives aimed at energy independence and reduction of
greenhouse gases, such as the increase of the fuel efficiency standards
for motor vehicles, the development of renewable energy technology
Getting the deal through – Oil Regulation 2010
. Pillsbury Winthrop shaw Pittman LLP
and ‘green’ jobs. Although the rhetoric of the new administration
promotes certain major changes to US energy policy, it remains to
be seen how these ideas will actually become incorporated into US
law and regulation.
Regulation overview
4
Describe the key laws and regulations that make up the general legal
framework regulating oil activities?
The determination of which laws apply to oil activities at a given
surface location depends on whether the underlying resources and
location are owned by a federal or state government or by private
parties, and whether the location is onshore or offshore.
The Mineral Lands Leasing Act governs upstream activities on
federal onshore property, while the OCS Lands Act governs development of federal offshore property. Additional industry-specific
federal statutes include the Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act
governing lease and royalty agreements, and the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act regulating supply agreements and leases held by
retailers and wholesalers of trademarked motor fuels.
State laws, such as the Texas Natural Resources Code and the
California Public Resources Code, govern exploration and production on state-owned land, including state offshore property, and privately owned land.
5
Identify and describe the government regulatory and oversight bodies
principally responsible for regulating oil activities.
Within the Department of the Interior (DOI), the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) regulates oil exploration and production on
federal onshore property; the Minerals Management Service (MMS)
regulates federal offshore activities; and the Bureau of Indian Affairs
(BIA) regulates American Indian land development along with the
BLM. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) has
jurisdiction over interstate oil pipelines.
The Department of Energy
(DOE) administers the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, collects industry
data, and funds and conducts other energy research and production
programmes.
Each of the major oil-producing states has an agency tasked with
regulating certain upstream activities, such as the issuance of drilling
permits and intrastate pipeline transportation. These agencies include
the Railroad Commission of Texas; the California Department of
Conservation’s Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources; the
Louisiana Office of Conservation; and the Alaska Department of
Natural Resources’ Division of Oil and Gas. Some state public utility
commissions oversee aspects of intrastate oil pipelines.
Many other agencies enforce police power laws and regulations
regarding environmental, health, safety and work conditions (see
question 20).
6
How does your country manage appeals of government regulatory
decisions?
Federal agency actions are governed by the Administrative Procedure
Act and related rules.
Industry-wide rulemakings follow different
appeal processes than party-specific adjudications. Review of an
agency adjudication is generally available first within the agency.
Parties affected by federal agency action generally have a right of
appeal directly to a US Court of Appeals after the agency has made its
final, appealable determination, and the parties have exhausted any
available administrative remedies; further review by the US Supreme
Court is discretionary.
When reviewing a final agency adjudication, the courts are typically deferential to the agency’s opinion and unlikely to overturn
it unless the petitioner can show a failure to comply with applicable procedural or statutory requirements, an abuse of discretion, or
www.gettingthedealthrough.com
united states
constitutional grounds for reversal. Review of agency rulemaking
is granted even more deference on review.
(States have their own
administrative procedure laws governing appeals.)
7
What standards are employed for oil measurement and oil facility
equipment? Are these voluntary or involuntary? Are they established
by a government body?
Federal and state laws do not typically mandate measurement or
equipment standards. Instead, regulations refer to or supplement privately established standards. The API has led the development of oil
equipment and operation standards.
The API’s Manual of Petroleum
Measurement Standards (MPMS) is widely used, as are publications
of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM).
8
What government body maintains oil production, export and import
statistics?
Official statistics on oil production, imports and exports are collected
by the Energy Information Administration (EIA) of the DOE. EIA
also provides forecasts and analysis of oil consumption, production,
reserves, refining and trade. State agencies maintain data on local
oil production.
Natural resources
9
Who holds title over oil reservoirs? To what extent are mineral rights
on private and public lands involved? Is there a legal distinction
between surface rights and subsurface mineral rights?
In the US, title to oil, gas and minerals is generally held by the owner
of the surface until and unless that right is severed and granted to
others.
This title to the mineral estate may be separated from the surface estate by a grant or a reservation. When the mineral estate has
been severed from the surface estate, the mineral estate owner holds
what is referred to as the ‘dominant estate’, and the surface estate
owner holds the ‘servient estate’. In general terms, this means that the
mineral estate owner has the right of reasonable access to and use of
the surface estate in order to exploit the minerals.
In Louisiana, the only civil law state in the US, mineral rights do
not exist as a separate, perpetual estate in land, but rather can only
be held separate from the surface in the form of a ‘mineral servitude’.
The servitude gives its holder the right to enter the property and
extract the minerals, but it may expire, or prescribe, after 10 years
of non-use.
Both the federal government and many states own oil, gas and
mineral rights both onshore and offshore.
Government and private
transfers frequently reserve to the grantor all or a portion of the mineral rights, so the land title records must be carefully reviewed.
10 What is the general character of oil exploration and production activity
conducted in your country? Are areas off-limits to exploration and
production?
In 2009, US oil production was concentrated in federal offshore
waters (30 per cent), Texas (20 per cent), Alaska (12 per cent), California (11 per cent), North Dakota (5 per cent) and Louisiana (4 per
cent). The primary contributors to production growth in 2009 and
2010 were the Thunder Horse, Tahiti, Shenzi and Atlantis offshore
fields located in the federal offshore waters of the Gulf of Mexico.
Almost all existing offshore leasing is in the central and western
Gulf of Mexico. In March 2010, the US president proposed allowing
for the first time oil and gas production in large areas off the East
Coast, in the eastern Gulf of Mexico, and potentially off the coast of
Alaska.
This proposal was almost immediately followed by the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig explosion and oil spill. The US president
151
. united states
has declared a six-month moratorium on deepwater drilling activities
in the Gulf of Mexico, cancelled a lease sale off the coast of Virginia,
and suspended all applications for exploratory drilling in the Arctic.
The future of offshore drilling – especially deep water offshore drilling – is uncertain in light of this incident.
Onshore, the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska remains
off limits to drilling despite intense debate in Congress. Apart from
national parks and wilderness areas, federal lands outside Alaska are
largely available for exploration and production. However, federal
and state agencies can also impose drilling restrictions on particular
lands on environmental, military or other grounds.
11 What government body regulates oil exploration and production in your
country? What is the character of that regulation?
US practices do not feature concessions or production sharing agreements typically associated with a state oil company. The right to conduct exploration and production on the lands of another is obtained
through an oil and gas lease granting the right to explore for and
extract oil from the leased premises, and the ownership of oil actually produced.
The terms of the lease and applicable law limit lessee
activities.
Processes established by the BLM (onshore), MMS (offshore),
and BIA (American Indian lands) govern the awarding of leases for
land, subject to federal jurisdiction. Analogous state agencies award
leases for state-owned lands. Private owners of subsurface mineral
rights negotiate or invite tenders for leases, which may follow trade
association formats or contain terms and conditions specific to the
particular lease.
12 If royalties are paid, what are the royalty rates? Are they fixed? Do
they differ between onshore and offshore production?
Federal leases impose a fixed royalty of a defined fraction of the
amount or value of the oil or gas removed or sold from each lease.
A
royalty rate of one-eighth was common up until the 1970s, though
currently rates such as three-sixteenths or one-sixth are common.
For onshore operations, this federal rate must be no less than oneeighth, whereas offshore operations tend to have one-sixth royalty
rates. Statutes fix most federal royalty rates, but both the DOI and
special legislation (like the Deep Water Royalty Relief Act) can
modify standard terms, usually by reducing the stated royalty rate
or suspending payment of royalties, to make frontier development
more attractive.
State and private leases have more variability in their royalty
terms, and may include a basis for payment other than proceeds or
market value. States reap varying portions of the royalty for federal
leases of land within or adjacent to their borders.
13 What is the customary duration of oil leases, concessions or
licences?
Private as well as public oil and gas leases usually feature a fixed
primary term and a conditional secondary term.
The number of years
in the primary term ranges from as low as one year in mature fields
to 10 years for frontier regions; private and American Indian leases
tend to have short primary terms. Even though no production may
be required during the primary term, the lease may be subject to
termination if the lessee fails to drill test wells or undertake specified
action or, in lieu thereof, pay an additional rental fee.
The secondary term continues indefinitely beyond the primary
term so long as either the leased area produces oil or gas in paying quantities or the lessee performs other specified activities on the
leased premises. The lease often excuses brief interruptions in production and longer interruptions due to force majeure.
152
Pillsbury Winthrop shaw Pittman LLP
14 For offshore production, how far seaward does the regulatory regime
extend?
The Submerged Lands Act establishes state jurisdiction over submerged lands extending three nautical miles (3.5 statutory miles, or
5.6 kilometres (km)) offshore (except Texas and Florida on the Gulf
of Mexico, whose jurisdiction extends three leagues (approximately
10 statutory miles, or 16km)).
The OCS Lands Act establishes federal
jurisdiction beyond the state limit, and a 1983 presidential proclamation declared that jurisdiction to extend to the boundary of the US
Exclusive Economic Zone, 200 nautical miles (about 230 statutory
miles, or 370km) from the coastline. (In practice, oil development is
active only to the edge of the OCS.)
15 Who may perform exploration and production activities? What criteria
and procedures apply in selecting such entities?
The MMS employs sealed-bid processes for OCS leases in accordance
with a five-year plan. Auctions are based not on variable royalty rates
but rather on the ‘signature bonus’ offered.
The BLM may negotiate
federal onshore leases individually, but awards most through a less
formal bid process. (See question 28 regarding restrictions on foreign
holdings.)
16 What is the legal regime for joint ventures?
The US does not specify a particular kind of joint venture for collaborative development of an oil production project. Operations by
one or more party come in two main categories.
The first is a contract
venture to share costs and benefits from a joint undertaking, often
conducted by one mineral rights owner or lessee on behalf of others
with interests in the same land or in lands embracing a particular
reservoir. (An example is the joint operating agreement, often entered
into on Association of International Petroleum Negotiators (AIPN)
or Association of American Landmen (AAPL) forms. The accounting
procedure under a joint operating agreement is often that specified
by the Council of Petroleum Accounting Societies (COPAS).) The
second category consists of separate legal entities, which are typically
encountered in processing, midstream and downstream applications.
These entities include general or limited partnerships, corporations
and limited liability companies.
17 How does reservoir unitisation apply to domestic and cross-border
reservoirs?
Unitisation is the consolidation of exploration and production activities affecting several parcels of land, or several interest holders in a
given parcel.
The consolidated activities are usually conducted by a
unit operator. The goal is the efficient development of the reservoir
and equitable distribution of the costs, risks and benefits of production. Unitisation may be consensual or, in several jurisdictions, may
be mandated when statutory requirements are triggered or agency
determinations are made.
Unitisation of federal lands requires DOI
approval. There are no cross-border reservoir unitisations involving
the US.
Pooling can be voluntary or compulsory under certain state statutes. Pooling joins the interests of the surrounding owners into a
single drilling and spacing unit which is entitled to only one well location.
Unlike unitisation, however, pooling does not have as its goal
the efficient development of the reservoir. Instead, pooling still results
in competitive operations, albeit among the larger pooled units.
Getting the deal through – Oil Regulation 2010
. Pillsbury Winthrop shaw Pittman LLP
Transportation
18 How is transportation of crude oil and crude oil products regulated
within the country and across national boundaries? Do different
government bodies and authorities regulate pipeline, marine vessel
and tanker truck transportation?
Rates and other terms for oil transportation via interstate pipelines are
regulated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), and
pipeline operators must file tariffs with FERC. FERC generally allows
carriers to charge market-based rates up to a ceiling. FERC regulations
also require interstate carriers to provide non-discriminatory service to
all shippers. The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration of the Department of Transportation (DOT) regulates the safety
of interstate oil pipelines.
States regulate intrastate oil pipelines and
may regulate gathering lines and other transportation activities. Some
states have adopted variations of FERC’s market–based rates policy.
Trucking and marine vessel transportation prices are not currently
regulated. However, safety, health and environmental regulations
apply generally to pipelines, vessels and trucks (see question 20).
19 What are the requisites for obtaining a permit or licence for
transporting crude oil and crude oil products?
Construction of a new interstate oil pipeline does not require approval
from the federal government unless the pipeline will cross federal
lands, but the operator must file a tariff with FERC.
Pipeline construction projects require permits from state or local agencies, although
some states no longer require public utility approval to construct new
pipelines. Other forms of transportation are not generally subject to
public utility regulation, but are subject to the Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Act and other health, safety and environmental laws.
Health, safety and environment
20 What health, safety and environment requirements apply to oil-related
facility operations? What government body is responsible for this
regulation; what enforcement authority does it wield? Are permits or
other approvals required? What kind of record-keeping is required?
What are the penalties for non-compliance?
entitlements for development
A new or modified exploration or development operation will usually need a local land use development permit as well as drilling and
operating permits. Many projects must undergo a thorough environmental impact review under the federal National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) or a state analogue.
The process includes substantial public involvement and can be quite contentious. Failure to
complete the process or comply with permits can lead to significant
delays, penalties and injunctions.
discharge restrictions
The federal discharge laws applicable to the oil sector are generally
not industry-specific. They are instead based on a particular impact:
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) for management of solid and hazardous waste; the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA or
Superfund) for cleanup of contaminated sites; the Clean Air Act
(CAA) for air emissions; and the Clean Water Act (CWA) and Safe
Drinking Water Act (SDWA) for water discharges.
The principal
federal enforcement agency is the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), but state agencies enforce similar state laws and can also be
delegated authority by the EPA to implement and enforce certain
federal statutes such as the CAA.
While the foregoing environmental laws are economy-wide,
there are some statutes that are focused on the oil and gas sector. For
example, the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA) addresses clean-up and
damage assessments relating to oil spills into the navigable waters
www.gettingthedealthrough.com
united states
of the US, the adjoining shorelines, or the exclusive economic zone.
Another example is the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002,
which governs the way in which the natural gas industry ensures the
safety and integrity of its pipelines.
Under the CWA, the EPA has issued effluent guidelines specific
to both upstream and downstream oil operations, as well as rules
applicable to the discharge of oil into navigable waters. Both federal
and state environmental laws regulate new and existing sources of air
pollution.
New sources, including existing sources undergoing major
modifications, must often comply with more stringent emissions or
technology standards.
Certain statutes also provide for the assessment of natural
resource damages. Specific to the oil industry, OPA provides that
responsible parties under the Act are liable for certain damages
caused by an oil spill, which include damages to natural resources,
real or personal property, subsistence use, lost government revenues,
lost profits and earning capacity, and lost public services.
Both CERCLA and OPA designate state and federal governments, and Indian tribes as trustees over the natural resources with
the obligation to act on behalf of the public to recover damages.
Therefore, when natural resources are damaged due to a discharge
or release, one or more trustees will be responsible for ensuring that
the resources are restored to their baseline condition and that the
public is compensated for the interim loss of use. For example, the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has primary responsibility to ensure that coastal resources are restored to
their original condition and use.
Discharge or emission limits may apply to all sources of a particular type (eg, refinery heaters and boilers), or may be facility-specific.
Regulations and permit conditions may include detailed record-keeping and reporting requirements.
Each statute and agency has considerable penalty, injunction and criminal law remedies for non-compliance
(eg, maximum of US$37,500 per day fines and imprisonment for
CAA violations), and in some cases private parties may also recover
damages or enforce public interests via citizen suits.
Recently, the EPA has enacted regulations under the CAA requiring certain facilities to monitor and record greenhouse gas emissions
pursuant to the Mandatory Reporting Rule (MRR). Depending on
the facility, the monitoring and record-keeping requirements can be
substantial. Facilities covered by the new rules include both upstream
and downstream operations.
navigation
Activities affecting navigable waters are regulated by the Army Corps
of Engineers, the US Coast Guard, and various other agencies such
as port authorities, each of which enforce laws such as the CWA and
the River and Harbors Act.
ecology
The Endangered Species Act can prohibit activities that might materially impair the habitats of threatened and endangered species.
For
example, a new facility might be prohibited in an area with an endangered plant species, or particular mitigation measures (such as habitat
replacement or augmentation) might be required to minimise adverse
impacts to an animal species. For offshore exploration, the Fishery
Conservation and Management Act governs impacts on the fishing
industry, and the Marine Mammal Protection Act does the same for
the affected mammals. In addition, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act
prohibits the taking or injuring of migratory birds, including nests
and eggs, and the National Marine Sanctuaries Act authorises the
secretary of commerce to designate and protect areas of the marine
environment having special national significance.
Cultural resources
A number of mandates deal with projects that may disturb or
uncover property of cultural significance, including the National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the American Antiquities Act of
153
.
united states
1906, the Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 1979, and the
Abandoned Shipwreck Act.
Health and safety
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and
state and local governments all enforce rules protecting employees
and contractors from workplace injuries. The MMS regulates and
enforces safety rules at offshore facilities such as drilling rigs and oil
platforms. Record-keeping requirements can be very significant; for
example, records of occupational injury must be kept for the duration of the employee’s service plus 30 years.
In addition to record-keeping requirements, OSHA also imposes
certain inspection and safety programme requirements involving
mechanical integrity of equipment, hazards analysis and process
safety. OSHA inspects facilities and has the power to issue citations
for violations.
Recently, OSHA issued the largest citation in its history – over US$87 million – after finding that the oil refinery had
failed to correct previously cited safety hazards.
The Chemical Safety Board (CSB) has the authority under the
CAA to investigate accidental releases resulting in a fatality, serious injury or substantial property damages. This authority includes
releases occurring at oil-related facilities such as refineries. Although
the CSB does not possess enforcement powers under its enabling
statute, the board does issue public recommendations and reports
that can influence other agency decisions.
Homeland security
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) implements requirements relating to safety and security under the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002 (MTSA) and the Chemical Facility
Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS).
The MTSA requirements include
development of site security plans, designation and management of
certain information as sensitive security information (SSI), and security clearances for personnel. The CFATS interim final rule issued in
2007 requires covered chemical facilities to prepare security vulnerability assessments, which identify facility security vulnerabilities, and
to develop and implement site security plans, which include measures
that satisfy the identified risk-based performance standards.
21 What health, safety and environmental requirements apply to oil and
oil product composition? What government body is responsible for this
regulation; what enforcement authority does it wield? Is certification
or other approval required? What kind of record-keeping is required?
What are the penalties for non-compliance?
The EPA regulates the composition of mobile source fuels and fuel
additives. However, a large portion of oil regulation occurs at the
state level.
Sales of imported products that do not comply with EPA
standards are prohibited. Uniquely, California may adopt its own
fuel standards, which may then be adopted verbatim by other states.
These regulations specify many elements of fuel composition, such as
volatility and aromatics, oxygenate and sulphur content.
Recently there have been several major federal fuel specification
changes. Among these changes are a reduction in the sulphur content
of gasoline, the elimination of the 2 per cent oxygen content requirement under the CAA for reformulated gasoline, and the 2010 revisions to the renewable fuels standard programme (RFS2) under the
EISA (see question 3).
On the state level, California regulators have
recently adopted the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS), which regulates the carbon intensity of California fuels in order to reduce the
amount of greenhouse gas emissions associated with transportation
fuels. Other states considering adopting LCFS regulations include
Oregon and Washington.
In most cases, fuel composition must be certified by the EPA
or the state air authority. These agencies may impose substantial
penalties for sale of non-complying fuels and for failure to maintain
accurate composition and manufacturing records.
The EPA incentiv-
154
Pillsbury Winthrop shaw Pittman LLP
ises self-evaluation, self-disclosure and correction of violations by not
recommending civil or criminal penalties for entities that promptly
address their non-compliance.
Other oil-based products, such as lubricants and solvents, are
regulated by the EPA pursuant to the Toxic Substances Control Act
(TSCA). The TSCA authorises the EPA to require pre-manufacture
notifications (PMN) for any new chemical substances prior to its
being imported to, or manufactured in, the US above a certain threshold amount. In most cases, PMNs must be supported by adequate
health and safety data, and the TSCA imposes reporting and recordkeeping obligations on manufacturers and distributors of subject
chemical substances.
Violations of the TSCA can result in civil and
criminal penalties, as well as seizure of products manufactured or
distributed in violation of the Act.
Labour
22 What government standards apply to oil industry labour? How is
foreign labour regulated? Are there anti-discrimination requirements?
What are the penalties for non-compliance?
Foreign workers
Oil companies, like other private employers, must comply with a
variety of laws respecting immigration. Hiring a non-resident generally requires an employment-based (or ‘non-immigrant’) visa, such
as the L-1 for existing foreign employees of a corporate group who
will be working in an executive, managerial or specialised-knowledge
position for the US subsidiary or branch; the H-1B for new employees for positions with professional, college-level degree requirements;
or the B-1 for shorter-term assignments. US employers must guard
against the hiring of undocumented individuals under the Immigration Reform and Control Act, and many oil companies require their
contractors to warrant they have not engaged in such hiring.
Labour relations
Employers in oil as well as other sectors must comply with a wide
range of federal statutes and regulations, including the National
Labor Relations Act (NLRA), the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA),
the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), and the Occupational
Safety and Health Act (OSH Act).
State and local laws and agencies
supplement the federal workplace rules.
The NLRA confers on private sector employees a variety of
rights to form unions; to engage in union organisation campaigns; to
bargain collectively; and to strike and take other concerted activity.
The NLRA also imposes limitations on those rights, and empowers
employers to conduct labour relations alone or in concert with similarly situated firms, and is enforced by the National Labor Relations
Board. Important labour unions in the US oil industry include the
Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers Union.
The FLSA imposes overtime and minimum wage requirements for
certain ‘non-exempt’ employees (ie, those not in exempt categories,
including management and some administrative activities). Specific
wage or overtime rules are provided for some particular oil industry
employers, such as certain wholesale distributors of refined products.
The FLSA is enforced by the Department of Labor (DOL).
The FMLA requires larger employers to provide up to 12 weeks
of unpaid annual leave for certain employees who have serious health
conditions or who desire to care for dependants.
An employee who
exercises the FMLA right enjoys certain assurances of post-leave
employment and protection from retaliation. This statute is also
enforced by the DOL.
The OSH Act created OSHA to set and enforce workplace health
and safety standards. In response to an explosion and fire in 2005
at a BP refinery in Texas that killed 15 employees and injured 170
others, OSHA announced the Petroleum Refinery Process Safety
Management National Emphasis Program (NEP) in 2007.
In 2009,
OSHA issued a report describing its first year NEP results. OSHA
Getting the deal through – Oil Regulation 2010
. Pillsbury Winthrop shaw Pittman LLP
noted its concern that inspection teams found many serious process
safety management compliance issues at refineries. Congress is currently considering a bill entitled ‘Protecting America’s Workers Act’
which, if passed, will increase the maximum fines allowable under
the OSH Act, and provide additional whistle-blower protection for
workers.
anti-discrimination
Many federal, state and local laws prohibit discrimination in employment on the basis of a ‘protected classification’ such as race, colour,
sex, religion, national origin, disability (mental or physical, including
pregnancy), age, Vietnam-era veteran status, sexual orientation or
medical condition. Even an ostensibly neutral policy that results in a
‘disparate impact’ on a race or sex classification can be the basis for
a claim, unless the employer can demonstrate the policy is justified
by ‘bona fide occupational qualifications’. The federal laws include
title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in
Employment Act, 42 USC section 1981 (prohibiting racial discrimination in employment), the Equal Pay Act, the Rehabilitation Act
and the Americans with Disabilities Act.
These statutes are generally
enforced by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
The remedies for a discrimination claim can be significant. They
can include orders of reinstatement, back and front pay, compensatory damages such as pecuniary losses and emotional distress, and
punitive or exemplary damages. Only a few of the anti-discrimination
laws have maximum penalties, such as the US$300,000 limitation
under title VII for compensatory and punitive damages.
Oil industry
employers have faced significant claims, both by individuals and by
collections of similarly situated employees bringing class actions. For
instance, in 1996 Texaco paid over US$170 million to settle racial
discrimination lawsuits. At the time, it was the largest racial discrimination settlement in the United States.
Taxation
23 What is the tax regime applicable to oil exploration, production,
transportation, and marketing and distribution activities? What
government body wields tax authority?
The income tax regime for exploration and production has numerous special features, whereas transportation, marketing and distribution are generally subject to the same rules facing other industrial
businesses.
A host of industry-specific deductions apply to upstream
expenditures – including pre-drilling exploration costs, intangible
drilling costs, accelerated depreciation of oilfield equipment and
depletion of subsurface resources. Tax planning is required for
optimal acquisition and divestiture of leases and other production
interests, such as production payments and farm-ins. State income
tax laws supplement these provisions and incentives (though not all
states impose an income tax).
Some states also impose severance
taxes on production.
Federal and state excise taxes are collected on the retail sale of
motor fuels. Oil companies are subject to state property tax on holdings of real property and certain personal property; state sales and
use tax on certain acquisitions of personal property; withholding
requirements on distributions to certain foreign shareholders and
partners; and transfer taxes on sales of real property.
The Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund, authorised under OPA, is
funded in part through an 8 per cent tax levied on oil companies for
every barrel of oil produced in or imported into the US.
The principal tax agency is the Internal Revenue Service at the
federal level, with customs duties being handled by the US Customs
Service of the Department of the Treasury, and state taxes being
administered by a variety of agencies.
www.gettingthedealthrough.com
united states
Commodity price controls
24 Is there a mandatory price-setting regime for crude oil or crude oil
products? If so, what are the requirements and penalties for noncompliance?
Crude oil is an international commodity, and as such its price is
determined by international supply and demand factors. Neither the
US federal government nor the states currently regulate the price of
crude oil or refined products.
More than half of the states have laws
or regulations that seek to regulate ‘price gouging’, particularly during times of declared emergency.
Competition, trade and merger control
25 What government bodies have the authority to prevent or punish anticompetitive practices in connection with the extraction, transportation,
refining or marketing of crude oil or crude oil products?
Two agencies enforce federal competition laws (called ‘antitrust laws’
in the US): the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (DOJ)
and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Each enforces statutes
of general application, including the Sherman Act on cartels and
monopolisation; the Clayton Act on mergers, exclusive dealing and
tying arrangements; and the Robinson-Patman Act amendments to
the Clayton Act on price discrimination and related practices. The
FTC also enforces the Federal Trade Commission Act prohibiting
‘unfair methods of competition’ and similar offences.
Many states and some subdivisions have antitrust and unfair
competition acts of broader generality.
Private parties may also bring
lawsuits seeking relief for most competition laws. At all levels, sanctions can include compensatory damages, punitive damages (often
mandatory trebling of the compensatory damages), recovery of attorneys’ fees and injunctive relief.
Regulations on concentration of oil lease holdings include the
MMS’s Restricted Bidder List of companies not permitted to acquire
more leases in a given region, and the review of new OCS lease
awards by the FTC and DOJ.
In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, the FTC conducted a
congressionally mandated investigation into whether gasoline prices
were artificially manipulated. In its 2006 report, the FTC found no
instances of the illegal market manipulation but isolated examples of
pricing not justified by supply and demand conditions.
26 What is the process for procuring a government determination that a
proposed action does not violate any anti-competitive standards? How
long does the process generally take?
The DOJ’s business review letter programme and the FTC’s advisory
opinion programmes are sometimes used for comfort on proposed
joint ventures, information exchanges and similar concerted activities.
The review period can extend many weeks or months from the
submission of all supporting data, and the agencies only describe
their current enforcement intentions without definitively approving
the conduct.
Certain joint ventures, mergers and business purchases are subject to mandatory reporting under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust
Improvements Act. Reports are made to both the DOJ and the FTC,
but the FTC usually takes the more active role for oil industry matters. The parties are prohibited from closing the transaction until
expiration of a waiting period for the government to decide whether
to seek an injunction.
The waiting period is usually 30 days after filing, or 15 days in the case of a cash tender offer, but can be extended
when an agency asks for more data. After the waiting period expires,
the parties can close but the agencies can still decide to file suit later.
(In 2005, the FTC imposed divestiture orders on a merged oilfield
business four years after the merger closed.)
155
. united states
Pillsbury Winthrop shaw Pittman LLP
International
27 To what extent is regulatory policy or activity affected by international
treaties or other multinational agreements?
Although the US is not a signatory to the Law of the Sea Treaty,
federal laws and executive orders have promulgated US offshore territorial zones and economic exclusion zones that are comparable to
those under the treaty.
The 1978 protocol to the 1973 International Convention for the
Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL) has spawned several
US statutes pertaining to oil tankers, including OPA, the Port and
Tanker Safety Act and the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships.
The US is a member of the World Trade Organization (WTO)
and a party to various WTO agreements. These instruments generally require member states not to discriminate against products
and services of any member state or between products and services
of different member states. However, there is an exception for free
trade agreements such as the North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA), which creates zero-duty regimes for imports and exports
of products among Canada, the US and Mexico, specifically including crude oil and refined products.
28 Are there special requirements or limitations on the acquisition of oilrelated interests by foreign companies or individuals?
The presence of BP, Shell and PDVSA/Citgo demonstrates that foreign investment in oil resources has been welcomed and successful.
However, some restrictions exist or may emerge.
Foreign persons cannot directly hold federal oil leases or certain
pipeline interests. But so long as their country of domicile does not
discriminate against US persons, US laws permit such foreigners to
own equity of a US legal entity that does hold the interest.
Foreign-owned and foreign-flagged oil tankers may call at US
ports en route to and from foreign destinations.
The combination
of statutes known as the Jones Act requires that ‘coastwise’ trade
between US ports generally must be conducted by vessels built and
flagged in the US and staffed with US crews.
The OCS Lands Act limits foreign staffing of many OCS facilities.
Foreign investors must comply with record-keeping requirements of
the International Investment and Trade in Services Survey Act.
The Exon-Florio Amendment to the Defense Production Act of
1950 empowers a committee of several cabinet departments (the
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, or CFIUS) to
determine whether foreign acquisition of a US business threatens the
Update and trends
Both anticipated and unexpected events are affecting the
prospects for oil production in the US. On the expected front,
the EPA has started the process of regulating greenhouse gas
emissions. Its first major action was to implement an informationgathering rule called the Mandatory Reporting Rule (MRR) in
2009, pursuant to its authority under the CAA. The MRR requires
certain upstream and downstream facilities to record and report
greenhouse gas emissions to the EPA. The EPA has indicated that
the information gathered will inform future policy decisions relating
to the regulation of emissions.
Unexpected events have also disrupted the US oil industry
and could potentially lead to major regulatory changes, especially
in the offshore exploration and production sector. At the forefront
is the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig explosion and oil spill in the
Gulf of Mexico in April 2010. An immediate reaction to this event
has been the US secretary of the interior’s proposal to restructure
MMS into two or more separate agencies in order to divide the
responsibilities for revenue collection and leasing from inspections
and saftety enforcement. As part of this comprehensive
restructuring, MMS was renamed the Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management effective June 2010. It is anticipated that federal
regulations relating to drilling operations will become much more
stringent and that oversight will be enhanced (see question 10).
national security of the United States and, in certain circumstances,
request that the president determine whether to suspend the proposed transaction.
Official CFIUS guidance published in 2008 restated the current
review factors, including the effects of the proposed transaction on
national requirements for energy sources and physically critical infrastructure ‘such as major energy assets’. The impact of CFIUS review
will be fact-specific depending on the characteristics of the proposed
acquisition.
29 Do special rules apply to cross-border sales or deliveries of crude oil
or crude oil products?
imports
Imports of crude oil generally are subject to the regulations and
standards of the US Federal Trade Commission, US Customs, the
US Department of Energy, and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Furthermore, if the import is a consumer product or a hazardous material, the import is subject to regulations and standards
of the Consumer Product Safety Commission in the first instance and
Robert a James
rob.james@pillsburylaw.com
stella dorman
stella.dorman@pillsburylaw.com
Joseph H Fagan
joseph.fagan@pillsburylaw.com
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
United States
Tel: +1 415 983 1000
Fax: +1 415 983 1200
2 Houston Center, 909 Fannin Street
Houston, TX 77010
United States
Tel: +1 713 276 7600
Fax: +1 713 276 7673
2300 N Street, NW
Washington, DC 20037
United States
Tel: +1 202 663 8000
Fax: +1 202 663 8007
www.pillsburylaw.com
156
Getting the deal through – Oil Regulation 2010
.
Pillsbury Winthrop shaw Pittman LLP
regulations and standards of the US Department of Transportation
in the second. While in a few limited instances the Department of
Energy must authorise importation of petroleum products, generally,
licences are no longer required to import petroleum products.
exports
The Department of Commerce restricts exports of all domestically
produced crude oil by requiring a licence for the export of crude oil
to all countries, including Canada. Except for a few categories of
transactions where the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) will
automatically approve a licence application, the BIS reviews licence
applications on a case-by-case basis. The BIS will analyse the application to determine if the transaction is in the national interest and consistent with the purposes of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act.
Exports of refined products are not currently limited in this manner.
www.gettingthedealthrough.com
united states
embargoes
The US maintains unilateral economic embargoes on certain countries, most notably Cuba, Iran and Sudan, pursuant to regulations
administered by the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets
Control.
These embargoes can prohibit US persons from engaging in
transactions involving the embargoed countries or their companies
or nationals, even when nothing will be imported into or exported
from the US.
* The authors would like to thank Deborah Carrillo and Ada Chen for their
assistance with this year’s update of the United States chapter.
157
. . as Regulation 2010
. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
united StateS
united States
Gas Regulation 2010
Joseph H Fagan, Michael S Hindus, Robert a James and Julie d Hutchings*
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Description of domestic sector
1
Describe the domestic natural gas sector, including the natural
gas production, liquefied natural gas (LNG) storage, pipeline
transportation, distribution, commodity sales and trading segments
and retail sales and usage.
The upstream segments of the United States gas sector are conducted
by the same kinds of entities that engage in the exploration and production of liquid hydrocarbons. These segments are characterised by
a variety of private parties, from individual entrepreneurs to large
integrated firms, engaged in securing grants of licences and leases
to explore for and produce valuable substances. Processing of gas
and fractionation of natural gas liquids (NGLs) can occur in the
field by the lessee, or downstream in plants on gathering or trunk
lines between the field and the main trunkline pipeline systems. The
midstream and downstream segments of gas and LNG storage, trunkline transportation and local distribution are typically conducted by
private entities subject to public utility regulation at the federal or
state level, or by municipal utility districts.
The US (including Puerto Rico) has 11 LNG terminals.
Twentytwo terminals have been permitted to be built by utilities, private
and publicly traded development firms, and oil companies with gas
production in the developing world.
There are approximately 293,000 miles of natural gas pipelines
in the US, approximately 65 per cent of which consists of interstate
pipelines. The interstate natural gas pipeline grid consists of about 183
billion cubic feet (bcf) per day of capacity and approximately 217,000
miles of pipeline. The grid continues to grow: in 2008, 84 natural
gas pipeline projects were completed, adding close to 4,000 miles, the
largest amount of pipeline construction in more than 10 years.
These
projects included extensions to access three new LNG terminals.
2
What percentage of the country’s energy needs are met directly
or indirectly with natural gas and LNG? What percentages of the
country’s natural gas needs are met through domestic production and
imported production?
According to the Energy Information Administration (EIA), in 2008
natural gas (including LNG) accounted for nearly one-quarter of US
energy consumption. Natural gas consumption was approximately
23 trillion cubic feet (tcf); roughly 82 per cent of that demand – about
20.6tcf – was met through domestic production. Net imports satisfy
the balance of demand.
In 2008, imports amounted to almost 4tcf,
comprised of pipeline imports (91 per cent) and LNG (9 per cent).
Almost all of the natural gas that the US imported via pipeline in
2008 was from Canada, with about 1 per cent coming from Mexico.
Most of the LNG that the US imported in 2008 – about 75 per cent
– came from Trinidad and Tobago.
3
What is the government’s policy for the domestic natural gas sector
and which bodies set it?
A central feature of US governmental policy for the domestic natural
gas sector is to prevent firms with monopoly power from being able
to abuse that power. However, this is balanced by policies that support increased gas production and, for limited parts of the sector,
deregulation and the promotion of competitive market forces. Policies are set by the legislative and executive branches of both federal
and state governments, with significant delegation of authority to
administrative agencies that are part of the executive branch, particularly the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC).
Regulation of natural gas production
4
What is the ownership and organisational structure for production of
natural gas (other than LNG)? How does the government derive value
from natural gas production?
In contrast to the oil sector, in which some companies are active
in all segments, it is more common for companies in the natural
gas sector to concentrate on two or three segments (eg, production
and gathering, or transmission and storage).
Ownership of pipeline
transportation capacity is separated from ownership of the natural
gas transported via pipeline, although some Canadian producers also
own natural gas pipelines that cross from Canada into the US.
The federal government does not participate directly as a party
in private natural gas production transactions. It derives value from
natural gas production through the royalties, annual rentals, and
bonus payments it receives for production on federally owned lands.
The Minerals Management Service (MMS) is the federal agency that
manages the nation’s mineral resources on the outer continental shelf
(OCS) and collects, accounts for and disburses revenues from federal
offshore leases and onshore leases on federal and American Indian
lands. In addition, government agencies impose a variety of taxes
and charges.
FERC, for example, is authorised to recoup its entire
budget appropriation through the imposition of annual charges and
filing fees.
5
Describe the statutory and regulatory framework and any relevant
authorisations applicable to natural gas exploration and production.
Production, drilling and supply
Natural gas producers are not directly regulated by the federal government. The prices they charge are generally a function of competitive markets, and are no longer regulated by the government. State
public utility commissions generally exercise regulatory authority
over retail natural gas rates and consumer protection issues.
transmission
FERC is the primary federal regulatory agency governing natural gas
transmission.
FERC has jurisdiction over the regulation of interstate
www.gettingthedealthrough.com
197
. united StateS
pipelines and is concerned with overseeing the implementation and
operation of the natural gas transportation infrastructure. In addition, FERC has primary regulatory authority to permit, site, and
approve onshore LNG import terminals.
State authorities regulate substantial pipeline capacity that is considered to be ‘intrastate’.
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
began regulating OCS pipelines in 2008, pursuant to the decision
of the US Court of Appals for the District of Columbia in Williams
Cos v FERC. The MMS subsequently passed a final rule to ensure
open access to OCS pipelines by providing complaint procedures for
shippers for oil and gas produced from federal leases on the OCS
who believe that they have been denied open and non-discriminatory
access to an OCS pipeline.
distribution
State regulatory utility commissions have oversight of issues related to
the siting, construction, and expansion of local distribution systems.
• FERC’s regulatory authority extends to the interstate transportation of natural gas, the importing of natural gas by pipeline or
LNG import terminals, and certain environmental and accounting matters. FERC obtains its authority and directives in the
regulation of the natural gas industry from a number of laws;
namely the Natural Gas Act of 1938, the Natural Gas Policy Act
of 1978, the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, the Natural Gas
Wellhead Decontrol Act of 1989, the Energy Policy Act of 1992
and the Energy Policy Act of 2005.
• The Office of Pipeline Safety of the Department of Transportation (DoT) has jurisdiction over pipeline safety.
• State public utilities commissions have jurisdiction over retail
pricing, consumer protection, and natural gas facility construction and environmental issues not covered by FERC or DoT.
FERC is designed to be independent from influence from the executive or legislative branches of government, or industry participants,
including the energy companies over which it has oversight.
FERC is
composed of five commissioners, who are nominated by the president
of the US and confirmed by the US Senate. Each commissioner serves
a five-year term, and one commissioner’s term is up every year.
DoI and DoT are cabinet-level agencies, and their respective secretaries are chosen by the president subject to Senate confirmation.
There are several adjudicatory options for challenging or appealing decisions of the regulator. The Commission may make a decision without any further procedures, it may hold a trial-type hearing
before an administrative law judge, or it may hold a technical conference or ‘paper’ hearing.
Alternate dispute resolution, like mediation
and arbitration, may also be used. FERC decisions may be appealed
to the federal Courts of Appeal.
Where FERC is implementing a federal statute, the plaintiff must
usually show that FERC’s implementation is an ‘arbitrary and capricious’ interpretation of the federal statute. This is a very high standard that is rarely satisfied.
Additionally, a party must show that it has
standing to bring the suit and satisfy other justiciability concerns such
as ripeness and mootness.
The government authorisations required to carry on natural
gas exploration and production activities depend on whether the
proposed project is to be conducted on federal, state or privatelyowned land, and whether it is proposed to be conducted onshore
or offshore.
Federal lands
Federal lands are managed by DoI. Within DoI, the MMS regulates
offshore drilling and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) regulates onshore drilling.
Offshore
The MMS manages the mineral resources on the OCS generally
beyond three miles from the coast, and is charged with ensuring
that production and drilling on the OCS are conducted in a safe
and environmentally responsible manner. DoI prepares a five-year
programme that specifies the size, timing and location of areas to
be assessed for federal offshore natural gas leasing.
Bids are usually
solicited on the basis of a cash bonus and a royalty agreement, with
the highest bidder awarded the lease. Additionally, although FERC
has traditionally assumed authority over OCS pipelines, the MMS
198
Onshore
BLM is charged with managing and conserving federally owned
land, including the natural gas resources. Unless they are specifically
carved out of the leasing programme, all BLM-managed lands and
national forests are open to leasing.
Gas leasing is generally not permitted in the national park system, in national wildlife refuges, in the
Wild and Scenic River Systems, and in wilderness areas. Leasing in
national forests requires specific permission from the Forest Service.
BLM reviews and approves permits and licenses for companies to
explore, develop, and produce natural gas on federal lands. Once
projects are approved, BLM enforces regulatory compliance.
State lands
Drilling on state lands is managed by State Departments of Natural Resources and related agencies.
Coastal states additionally have
authorisation rights over submerged lands and ‘inland waters’ within
three miles of the coast. Each state has its own sets of requirements
and regulations governing the leasing of such state-owned lands.
Privately owned lands
The leasing of private land is generally left up to each individual
landowner.
Regulation of natural gas pipeline transportation and storage
6
Describe in general the ownership of natural gas pipeline
transportation and storage infrastructure.
Pipeline transportation and storage of natural gas are conducted by
the private sector. According to the EIA, there are 185 companies
operating natural gas pipelines in the United States.
Private companies in the US operate over 400 underground storage facilities,
mainly in depleted reservoirs, aquifers and salt caverns.
7
Describe the statutory and regulatory framework and any relevant
authorisations applicable to the construction, ownership, operation
and interconnection of natural gas transportation pipelines, and
storage.
Pursuant to section 7 of the NGA, interstate pipelines and gas storage
facilities must obtain certification from FERC before constructing
or expanding facilities. Intrastate gas transmission and distribution
facilities are certificated by state and local authorities.
Under applicable statutes, FERC will issue a certificate to a pipeline if there is a benefit to the public, including compliance with
environmental standards. Current FERC policy is generally to issue
certificates to all pipelines that comply with the statutory standards,
but to let the market decide which pipelines will be built.
8
How does a company obtain the land rights to construct a natural gas
transportation or storage facility?
The location, construction and operation of interstate pipelines,
facilities, and storage fields involved in moving natural gas across
state boundaries must be approved by FERC.
The pipeline company
proposes the route or location, which is then reviewed by FERC. If
a proposed pipeline route is on or adjacent to private land, the company will inform the private landowners and obtain any necessary
rights-of-way (or alternative access rights) prior to construction. The
Getting the deal through – Gas Regulation 2010
.
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
applicant must consider alternative routes or locations to avoid or
minimise the effects on such things as buildings, fences, crops, water
supplies, soil, vegetation, wildlife, air quality, noise, safety and landowner interests. FERC staff will consider whether the pipeline can
be placed near or within an existing pipeline, power line, highway
or railroad right-of-way. A pipeline certified by FERC has eminent
domain authority. Storage fields are usually located in depleted oil
or natural gas production fields or in salt deposits.
9
How is access to the natural gas transportation system and storage
facilities arranged? How are tolls and tariffs established?
There are essentially three major types of pipelines along the transportation route: the gathering system, the transmission pipeline, and
the distribution system.
The gathering system transports raw natural
gas from the wellhead to the processing plant. Transmission pipelines use higher pressure and larger diameter pipes to move natural gas quickly over long distances, and are typically interstate but
can be intrastate. Interstate pipelines carry natural gas across state
boundaries, whereas intrastate pipelines transport natural gas within
a particular state.
Interstate natural gas pipeline networks transport
processed natural gas from processing plants in producing regions
to those locations with high natural gas requirements, particularly
large, populated urban areas. Distribution systems deliver the natural
gas to homes, businesses and power plants.
Transportation of natural gas is closely linked to its storage. If the
natural gas being transported is not required at the time, it can be put
into storage facilities for when it is needed.
Natural gas pipeline companies have customers on both ends of the pipeline – the producers
and processors that deliver gas into the pipeline, and the consumers
and local distribution companies that take gas out of the pipeline.
In accordance with FERC rules, access to interstate natural gas
transportation and storage services must be provided on a non-discriminatory basis. Generally, purchasers of gas interstate transportation and storage services negotiate individual contracts with pipeline
and storage companies, which are subject to the service provider’s
tariff as approved by FERC. Where there is limited capacity for
interstate storage or transportation, capacity is allocated through a
bidding process in which the pipeline or storage capacity is generally awarded to the highest bidders.
Under FERC rules, the terms
and rates charged for all interstate pipeline transportation and storage services must be applied in a non-discriminatory manner, not be
unduly restrictive and be fair to all parties.
10 Can customers, other natural gas suppliers or an authority require a
pipeline or storage facilities owner or operator to expand its facilities
to accommodate new customers? If so, who bears the costs of
interconnection or expansion?
FERC is authorised under section 7(a) of the NGA to order a company to establish physical connection of its transportation facilities
with the facilities of, and sell natural gas to, persons engaged in local
distribution of natural or artificial gas to the public if FERC finds
that it is ‘necessary or desirable in the public interest’ to do so and
that ‘no undue burden will be placed upon a natural gas company’.
Customers and natural gas suppliers can petition FERC to order an
expansion of interstate natural gas transportation facilities. FERC is
prohibited from compelling the enlargement of transportation facilities, the establishment of physical connection, or the sale of natural
gas if those actions would impair a natural gas company’s ability to
render adequate service to its existing customers. The costs of such
expansion shall be considered in determining rates to be charged for
service by the natural gas company.
united StateS
11 Describe any statutory and regulatory requirements applicable to
the processing of natural gas to extract liquids and to prepare it for
pipeline transportation.
The processing of natural gas is largely unregulated at the federal
and state levels except for applicable environmental, health, safety
and related regulations.
Processing facilities not directly involved in
jurisdictional (interstate) transportation of gas are generally exempt
from FERC jurisdiction.
12 Describe the contractual regime for transportation and storage.
Each pipeline and storage company providing gas transportation and
storage services subject to FERC jurisdiction is required to file and
obtain FERC approval of a tariff for such services. Each tariff contains the general terms and conditions of service, rate schedules and
form agreements. General terms and conditions in both transportation and storage tariffs typically address priority and curtailment
of service; nominations and scheduling; receipt and delivery points;
quality and pressure; title and risk of loss; measurement; fuel reimbursement; and balancing.
Transportation rate schedules typically set
forth maximum and minimum rates for the various types and classes
of service, and mutually agreed recourse rates that are no less than
the minimum tariff rate.
Contracts for intrastate transportation and storage of natural gas
can also be privately negotiated. In many states, these contracts are
subject to the provider’s tariff that has been filed with a state governmental authority, but typically do not require advance approval.
Regulation of natural gas distribution
13 Describe in general the ownership of natural gas distribution
networks.
In addition to interstate and intrastate pipeline companies, which
deliver natural gas directly to primarily large-volume users, natural gas local distribution companies (LDCs) transport gas to specific customer groups. In 2006, 257 LDCs classified themselves as
investor-owned, 931 as municipals, 104 as privately owned and
15 as cooperative.
Even though the number of municipal LDCs
far exceeded the number of investor-owned LDCs, investor-owned
LDCs supplied over 90 percent of the total volume of natural gas
deliveries for 2006.
14 Describe the statutory and regulatory structure and authorisations
required to operate a distribution network. To what extent are gas
distribution utilities subject to public service obligations?
The operation of a local distribution network by an LDC is governed
by the state regulatory authority with jurisdiction where the facilities are located. The LDC may be required to obtain certificates of
convenience and necessity to serve in the state and comply with all
applicable safety regulations.
The territories granted to LDCs are
typically exclusive.
Service by LDCs is generally required to be non-discriminatory
and at rates approved by the state regulatory authority. While each
LDC retains the right to disconnect service for non-payment, those
rights are subject to consumer protection regulations in most jurisdictions. However, LDCs are protected in most states by an implied
right to obtain a reasonable rate of return on their investments.
15 How is access to the natural gas distribution grid organised? Describe
any regulation of the prices for distribution services.
In which
circumstances can a rate or term of service be changed?
State and federal regulatory agencies have authority over access to
the natural gas distribution grid and, as a result, the requirements
differ from state to state. Generally, LDCs are granted the excluwww.gettingthedealthrough.com
199
. united StateS
sive right to serve customers within a geographic area. An LDC has
the benefit of a known customer base, but is also subject to rate
regulation and an obligation to provide service. In many states, large
customers have the ability to bypass the LDC with respect to the purchase of gas because of their ability to buy in significant quantities;
however, even these customers will need to avail themselves of the
LDC’s distribution services. In some circumstances, large retail customers can receive service directly from interstate pipelines through
FERC-approved laterals, thus bypassing the LDC completely.
Privately owned LDCs generally have their rates determined by
the state regulatory authority, but the rates of publicly owned LDCs
are normally set by the LDC’s governing body.
Rates typically allow
the LDC a reasonable return on investment, based on the cost of
providing service. Bundled rates include fees for access to the distribution system.
Periodic adjustments may be made to rates and terms of service,
either at the LDC’s request or by order of the governing state regulatory authority. Changes are typically made on the basis of changes in
operating costs or the applicable law.
New capital investments may
also be the basis for a rate increase request.
16 May the regulator require a distributor to expand its system to
accommodate new customers? May the regulator require the
distributor to limit service to existing customers so that new
customers can be served?
If an LDC has been granted an exclusive right to serve within a particular geographic area by state law, it will also generally be required
to extend its system to serve new customers within that area, if it can
do so without jeopardising the service provided to existing customers. The process for expanding an existing system (including issues
such as the manner in which costs of expansion are recouped) is set
forth in state statutes or regulations.
17 Describe the contractual regime in relation to natural gas distribution.
Most contracts for natural gas distribution are either established by
a filed tariff or bilateral service agreements with terms specific to the
customer being served with respect to terms such as quantity of the
commodity and the type of service. However, certain terms of service will likely be the same for all customers of the LDC in the same
class.
There is typically little flexibility for negotiation for individual
customers with respect to the terms of a service agreement.
Regulation of natural gas sales and trading
18 What is the ownership and organisational structure for the supply and
trading of natural gas?
Natural gas is supplied and traded by private-sector companies, pursuant to privately negotiated transactions. These companies can be
privately or publicly owned and range in size from entrepreneurs to
very large organisations, but counterparties value creditworthiness
and staying power in their trading partners.
19 To what extent are natural gas supply and trading activities subject to
government oversight?
Under the current regulatory regime, only pipelines and LDCs are
directly regulated. Interstate pipeline companies are regulated in the
rates they charge, the access they offer to their pipelines, and the siting and construction of new pipelines.
Similarly, LDCs are regulated
by state utility commissions, which oversee their rates and construction issues, and which ensure that proper procedures exist for maintaining adequate supply to customers.
While there is no direct government agency charged with
direct day-to-day oversight of natural gas producers and marketers,
200
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
producers and marketers must still comply with other laws including
authorisation and permitting requirements.
The trading of natural gas is largely market-driven; however,
rules are in place to ensure that the market is operated fairly. FERC
has also implemented ‘anti-manipulation’ rules that prohibit fraudulent or deceptive practices and omissions or misstatements of material facts, in connection with purchases or sales of natural gas or
transportation services subject to FERC jurisdiction.
The Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) regulates natural gas futures to prevent similar abusive trade practices.
On 26 January 2010, the CFTC provided notice of a proposed
rulemaking which would implement speculative position limits for
natural gas futures and option contracts (see www.cftc.gov/ucm/
groups/public/@lrfederalregister/documents/file/2010-1209a.pdf for
further information). This proposed rulemaking was a response to a
2008 amendment to the Commodities Exchange Act, and to a series
of hearings held in the summer of 2009 to ‘discuss energy position
limits and hedge exemptions’.
20 How are physical and financial trades of natural gas typically
completed?
There are two primary types of natural gas marketing and trading:
physical trading and financial trading.
Physical trading is the buying and selling of natural gas. Financial trading, on the other hand,
involves derivatives and other financial instruments where the buyer
and seller never take physical delivery of the natural gas. The North
American Energy Standards Board (NAESB) serves as an industry
forum for the development and promotion of standards for natural
gas and electricity markets.
Physical trading contracts are negotiated between buyers and
sellers.
There are numerous types of such contracts but they normally
contain standard terms, such as specifying the buyer and seller, the
price, the amount of natural gas to be sold, the receipt and delivery
points, and the term of the contract. Additional terms and conditions
outline the payment dates, quality specifications and any other provisions agreed to by both parties.
There is a significant market for natural gas derivatives and
financial instruments in the US. It has been estimated that the value
of trading that occurs on the financial market is 10 to 12 times
greater than the value of physical natural gas trading.
Natural gas derivatives are traded on the New York Mercantile
Exchange (NYMEX) and other exchanges.
One of the most common
derivatives is a futures contract that requires the seller to deliver and
the buyer to take delivery of the natural gas at the contractually
agreed price, in a specified future month. The price to be paid in the
future month when the contract matures is determined at the time
the contract is sold. Other natural gas derivatives include options
contracts, calendar spread options and basis swap futures contracts.
In addition to the derivatives available on NYMEX, other derivatives
are traded in over-the-counter (OTC) markets.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA)
has created a standard contract (the ISDA master agreement) for
OTC derivatives transactions, which can be used for physical and
financial trades as well.
The ISDA master agreement contains general
terms and conditions, such as provisions relating to payment netting,
tax gross-up, tax representations, basic corporate representations,
basic covenants and events of default and termination, but does not
include details of any specific derivatives transactions the parties may
enter into. Details of individual derivatives transactions are included
in ‘confirmations’ entered into by the parties to the ISDA master
agreement. Each confirmation sets out the agreed commercial terms
of a particular transaction.
Getting the deal through – Gas Regulation 2010
.
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
21 Must wholesale and retail buyers of natural gas purchase a bundled
product from a single provider? If not, describe the range of services
and products that customers can procure from competing providers.
In Order No. 636, FERC required interstate pipelines to separate or
unbundle their services for gas transportation and sales. Regulators
in many states have also required LDCs to offer unbundled sales and
transportation services for large customers located in their distribution systems. As a result, LDCs, large industrial customers, and electric utilities can now buy gas directly from producers or marketers in a
competitive market; contract with interstate pipelines for transportation; and separately arrange for storage and other services formerly
provided by interstate pipelines or LDCs (such as nominating, balancing, parking, loaning, metering and billing) from marketers, market
centres, hubs, storage operators, and other third-party providers.
Some state regulatory agencies allow smaller-volume customers to participate in aggregation programmes in order to purchase
unbundled services.
As of December 2008, 21 states and the District
of Columbia have allowed residential consumers and other small
users to purchase natural gas from suppliers other than LDCs. Such
customers are typically offered unbundled services on a limited basis
through an intermediate marketer who ‘rebundles’ the services and
offers them as a competitively priced alternative. Where unbundled
LDC services are available, some states require the smaller customers to purchase a standby service from the LDC.
Although nearly 35
million of the approximately 65 million residential gas customers in
the US have access to choice programmes, currently 13 per cent (4.7
million) are participating in such programmes – a modest increase
from 2007 (4.4 million).
Regulation of LNG
22 What is the ownership and organisational structure for LNG, including
liquefaction and export facilities and receiving and regasification
facilities?
All currently operating US LNG facilities are ultimately owned by
US or foreign private companies. Ownership structures vary from
project to project and may include direct ownership by a single entity,
joint ventures among two or more parties, or many other possible
structures. Terminals may be operated either on a ‘tolling’ basis,
where the terminal operator does not take title to the hydrocarbons,
or with passage of title to or from the terminal operator or owners
before or after completion of the regasification process.
23 Describe the regulatory framework and any relevant authorisations
required to build and operate LNG facilities.
For offshore LNG facilities, the US Coast Guard (the USCG) and the
Maritime Administration (MARAD) of DoT have joint authority over
the application process.
In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Deepwater Port Act of 1974 (the DPA),
the USCG oversees the preparation and review of an environmental
impact statement, which addresses the environmental impact that a
proposed offshore facility would have on the environment.
MARAD has ultimate jurisdiction for approving or denying an
application to construct and operate an offshore LNG facility. Its
decision is based on input from the USCG and several other federal
agencies, including the Environmental Protection Agency (the EPA),
DoI’s MMS and the US Army Corps of Engineers.
Also, the DPA provides that the governor of a state adjacent to
the proposed offshore facility must approve of the facility.
For onshore LNG facilities – which represent the majority of
existing and proposed facilities in the US – the NGA confers on
FERC the authority to approve or deny an application to develop an
LNG terminal. While FERC has ultimate decision-making authority,
several other federal, state and local agencies play a role in the process.
These agencies include the USCG, with respect to marine transit
www.gettingthedealthrough.com
united StateS
issues relating to LNG tankers, the US Army Corps of Engineers, DoI
and the EPA with respect to environmental impacts, and the Office
of Pipeline Safety with respect to issues relating to siting, design, construction, testing, operation and safety of the facilities (including any
pipelines associated with such facilities). Various state and local land,
environmental, wildlife and historical preservation agencies also play
a role in approving or denying a proposed facility.
24 Describe any regulation of the prices and terms of service in the LNG
sector.
LNG terminals built after the passage of the Energy Policy Act of 2005
are not required to offer open access to any qualified customer. The
owner of the terminal may offer access to customers of its choosing
at prices and on such terms and conditions as may be agreed between
the owner and the customer, which terms are generally reflected in a
terminal use agreement between the terminal owner and the customer.
However, open access requirements do still apply to pipelines transporting regasified LNG from LNG terminals in the US.
Mergers and competition
25 Which government body may prevent or punish anti-competitive or
manipulative practices in the natural gas sector?
Prohibitions of anti-competitive and manipulative conduct are
found in federal and state laws of general application (called ‘antitrust laws’ in the US), and in the laws and regulations applicable to
public utilities in particular.
The antitrust laws include the Sherman
Act (combinations in restraint of trade, monopolisation), the Clayton Act (mergers, exclusive dealing) and the Robinson-Patman Act
amendments to the Clayton Act (discrimination on price and other
terms of sale), and are enforced at the federal level by the Federal
Trade Commission (FTC) and the antitrust division of DoJ; the FTC
may also enjoin unfair acts of competition under the Federal Trade
Commission Act (FTC Act). Many states have analogues to some
or all of the federal antitrust laws, and some of the state laws have
particular application to petroleum products, including natural gas.
The main federal and state antitrust laws are also enforced by state
attorneys general, local governmental bodies and in some cases by
private parties injured by the conduct in question.
The governmental bodies responsible for regulation of public
utilities enforce their own rules, particularly FERC and the various
state public utilities commissions (PUCs). FERC created its own
Office of Enforcement (superseding the former Office of Market
Oversight and Investigations) with responsibility for identifying and
taking action against fraud and anti-competitive practices in electricity and gas sectors.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 broadened the
scope of FERC’s rule-making and enforcement authority under the
NGA to prevent market manipulation. Competition principles also
inform the review and approval by these bodies of the rates and terms
and conditions of tariffs for interstate and intrastate transportation
and storage service.
26 What substantive standards does that government body apply to
determine whether conduct is anti-competitive or manipulative?
The antitrust laws generally draw a distinction between conduct that
is highly likely to be anti-competitive without redeeming justification
and per se unlawful (eg, cartels), and conduct whose anti-competitive effects must be examined and weighed against any justifications,
employing a ‘rule of reason’. The definition of the relevant geographical and product market, and measures of industrial concentration
within that market, must be evaluated under the rule of reason and
for other antitrust laws dealing with market power and monopolisation offences.
The FTC Act and similar acts enjoining unfair competition employ a wider variety of standards that may not fall within the
201
. united StateS
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Update and trends
After the enactment of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, it was widely
believed that FERC would increase its enforcement activities to
levels commensurate with its new authority under the Act. While
the organisation has been becoming steadily more active since
2005, 2009 could be considered the year FERC fully embraced its
enforcement powers and obligations. In its annual enforcement report,
it identified four key enforcement focus areas:
·
fraud and market manipulation;
·
reliability standard violations;
·
anti-competitive behaviour; and
·
conduct that threatens market transparency.
Of particular importance for those involved in the natural gas markets,
however, is not the enforcement focus areas themselves; rather, the
most significant consequence is that every enforcement action listed
in the enforcement report is a ‘civil penalty enforcement action’ that
was undertaken against an entity involved in the natural gas industry.
scope of specific laws, potentially including manipulation of prices
or price indices.
27 What authority does the government body have to preclude or remedy
anti-competitive or manipulative practices?
All of the federal and state antitrust enforcement agencies have
power to seek monetary damages and a variety of equitable remedies for violation of the laws they are authorised to enforce; many
of these laws carry criminal penalties, and damages can be trebled
or otherwise subject to increase for punitive or exemplary purposes.
Federal and state agencies have the power to revoke authorisations
for market-based rate-making in the event that an entity is found to
have engaged in anti-competitive practices. Violations of an unfair
competition law are ordinarily subject to an injunction but a violation of that injunction can result in fines.
Private parties can seek
damages for injuries to them occasioned by violation of the laws, and
in some cases can bring class actions for others similarly situated.
Pursuant to the Energy Policy Act of 2005, FERC has the authority to issue rules to inhibit market manipulation and to facilitate price
transparency in natural gas markets. FERC has recently instituted
regulations that require certain gas market participants to annually
report information regarding their wholesale, physical natural gas
transactions; their reporting of transactions to price index publishers;
and their blanket certificate status. Similar regulations require interstate and certain major non-interstate pipelines to post capacity, daily
scheduled flow information and daily actual flow information.
In addition, the Energy Policy Act of 2005 confers greater enforcement authority to FERC in order to prevent market manipulation.
FERC has the ability to seek injunctions prohibiting those who have
engaged in energy market manipulation from further engaging in
activities subject to FERC’s jurisdiction.
The Act also increases the
maximum civil penalties to US$1 million per violation per day, and
increases the maximum criminal penalties to US$1 million per violation and up to five years’ imprisonment.
28 Does any government body have authority to approve or disapprove
mergers or other changes in control over businesses in the sector or
acquisition of production, transportation or distribution assets?
Mergers and certain changes in control are subject to notification to
the FTC and DoJ under the Hart-Scott Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (HSR Act). (Natural gas transactions
are usually reviewed by the FTC.) The reportability of a transaction
depends on the size of the transaction and in certain circumstances
the size of the parties thereto. A higher threshold exists for acquisitions of natural gas and oil reserves and associated production assets,
including gathering pipelines; that minimum is US$500 million.
For
202
The alleged violations ran the gamut from market manipulation to
violations of the capacity release rules, and the settlements included
civil penalties running into the millions, as well as the disgorgement
of unjust profits. Some entities were also required to file compliance
reports at regular intervals to assure FERC of their intent to comply
with applicable regulations going forward. While self-reporting of
violations was prevalent, there was no clear correlation between selfreporting and decreased civil penalty amounts.
In light of the increased attention being paid to enforcement
activities, FERC is attempting to provide more transparency regarding
its enforcement actions.
The agency has recently adopted policies
allowing public disclosure of notices of violations in non-public
investigations and requiring FERC staff to provide exculpatory evidence
to entities that are the subject of FERC enforcement actions. As FERC
continues to refine its enforcement policies and practices, natural
gas industry participants should pay close attention to enforcement
developments in order to avoid becoming a FERC enforcement target.
midstream and downstream transactions, transactions greater than
US$63.4 million may require review. The structure of the transaction
– whether a merger, contributions to an existing business, or other
forms – can also affect whether the deal is reportable.
The purpose of the requirements is to provide the enforcement
agencies with the information needed to evaluate whether the combination would violate the antitrust laws, and the time needed to seek
an injunction in court barring the deal from proceeding.
The parties
ordinarily may not consummate the transaction until 30 days after
the filing (though the agencies can make a second request for more
information and stop the clock while the additional information is
assembled and delivered). For non-controversial transactions, as is
typical in the upstream sector, the agencies grant an early termination
of this waiting period, and a merger can be completed in two weeks
from the filing. For controversial transactions, the agencies may signal
their willingness to enter into a consent decree conditioned on certain
divestitures or promises to engage or refrain from engaging in certain
acts; or the parties can enter into sustained negotiations or litigation
occupying months.
Moreover, the agencies can forego the opportunity
to enjoin the merger and instead challenge it long after the deal has
closed. This has occurred several times in the energy sector.
FERC itself has limited grounds for reviewing mergers in the
natural gas sector. In some cases, FERC action must be taken for
issuance or revision of certificates of public convenience and necessity, or for abandonment of assets under the NGA.
29 In the purchase of a regulated gas utility, are there any restrictions on
the inclusion of the purchase cost in the price of services?
The purchase of a regulated gas utility is subject to state regulation.
Upon purchase of a regulated utility, most states will set rates based
on the net book value of facilities instead of the purchase price.
Additionally, states typically bar the inclusion of any acquisition premium
in rates.
30 Are there any restrictions on the acquisition of shares in gas utilities?
Do any corporate governance regulations or rules regarding the
transfer of assets apply to gas utilities?
With the repeal in 2005 of the Public Utility Holding Company Act
of 1935, there are no general federal prohibitions on entities that may
own a gas utility company or requirements for registration with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). However, acquisition of
assets that have been dedicated to use by public utilities is often also
subject to review and approval by the state commission with jurisdiction. An example is section 851 of the California Public Utilities Code,
requiring approval by the California Public Utilities Commission.
Getting the deal through – Gas Regulation 2010
.
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
International
33 What rules apply to cross-border sales or deliveries of natural gas?
31 Are there any special requirements or limitations on foreign companies
acquiring interests in any part of the natural gas sector?
There are no special requirements or limitations on foreign companies acquiring interests in the natural gas sector. However, an entity
applying for certification of a liquefied natural gas facility under section 3 of the NGA and the regulations issued pursuant to that section
by FERC is required to disclose on the application any ownership
by a foreign government or subsidisation by a foreign government.
In addition, under the Exon-Florio Amendment to the Defense Production Act of 1950, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the
United States (CFIUS) reviews proposed foreign investments in US
facilities to determine whether such investment threatens US national
security. Exon-Florio was amended by the Foreign Investment and
National Security Act of 2007 (FINSA) and now expressly treats
‘energy security’ and ‘critical infrastructure’ as falling within the
concept of national security; the law now mandates full-scale CFIUS
review where the proposed purchaser is owned by a foreign government. Finally, there are other laws applicable to the natural gas
industry restricting foreign ownership, including the Mineral Lands
Leasing Act, which forbids aliens and foreign corporations from
directly owning mineral leases on federal lands.
32 To what extent is regulatory policy affected by treaties or other
multinational agreements?
While treaties and other multinational agreements have little direct
effect on purely domestic US gas regulatory policies, they do have
an effect on international importing, exporting and trading of natural gas.
Multilateral agreements entered into by the US and other
members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) typically dictate
how WTO members may treat goods exported from other WTO
members, including gas and other petroleum products.
However, in the event of a conflict between a regional trade agreement and a WTO trade agreement, the regional trade agreement preempts the WTO trade agreement. For example, the North American
Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) allows for duty-free imports and
exports of gas among the US, Canada and Mexico.
Joseph H Fagan
Michael S Hindus
Robert a James
Julie d Hutching
50 Fremont Street
San Francisco, CA 94105
United States
Tel: +1 415 983 1000
Fax: +1 415 983 1200
united StateS
The NGA prohibits the import or export of natural gas to or from the
US without obtaining the prior approval of the Department of Energy
(DoE). The DoE offers two types of import and export authorisations:
long-term authorisation and ‘blanket’ (short-term) authorisation.
Long-term authorisation must be sought by a party wishing to
import or export natural gas pursuant to a signed gas purchase and
sale contract that has a term longer than two years.
The applicant
must submit to the DOE: an application, a copy of the gas purchase
and sale contract identifying the seller of the gas and the markets in
which the gas will be sold, and the term of the contract.
Vessels that are importing LNG into the US are deemed to pose a
special security risk. The USCG and the US Bureau of Customs and
Border Protection scrutinise such vessels more so than many other
vessels importing cargo into the US, which often results in delays in
the delivery and unloading of LNG.
Like most goods imported into the US, gas imports are subject
to US customs regulations. While many of these regulations apply
uniformly across products, in the case of bulk petroleum imports
certain additional information is required in order for imports to be
cleared by customs.
Transactions between affiliates
34 What restrictions exist on transactions between a natural gas utility
and its affiliates?
In October 2008, after a state of flux, FERC issued Order No.
717,
which amended the Standards of Conduct governing, among other
things, transactions by jurisdictional natural gas transmission providers and their affiliates. Order No. 717 designed new rules to foster
compliance with the Standards of Conduct, to facilitate enforcement
by the commission and to conform the rules to the 2006 decision of
the US Court of Appeals (DC Circuit) in National Fuel Gas Supply
Corporation v FERC.
The standards now have three principal rules:
• the ‘independent-functioning rule’, which requires employees
handling transmission functions and employees handling marketing functions (such as commodity sales) to operate independently of each other;
joseph.fagan@pillsburylaw.com
michael.hindus@pillsburylaw.com
rob.james@pillsbury.law
julie.hutchings@pillsburylaw.com
2 Houston Center, 909 Fannin Street
Houston, TX 77010
United States
Tel: +1 713 276 7600
Fax: +1 713 276 7673
2300 N Street, NW
Washington, DC 20037
United States
Tel: +1 202 663 8000
Fax: +1 202 663 8007
www.pillsburylaw.com
www.gettingthedealthrough.com
203
. united StateS
•
•
the ‘no-conduit rule’, which prohibits employees of a transmission provider from passing information about transmission functions to marketing function employees; and
the ‘transparency rule’, which imposes streamlined posting
requirements on transmission providers to help FERC and other
interested parties detect any instances of undue discrimination or
preference.
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
35 Who enforces the affiliate restrictions and what are the sanctions for
non-compliance?
FERC has enforcement authority with respect to its regulations governing transactions between a natural gas utility and its affiliate. It has
the ability to impose sanctions that could include restrictions or revocation of operating authority and the right to impose civil penalties.
* The authors thank Deborah Carrillo and Ada Chen for their assistance
with this year’s update of the US chapter.
204
Getting the deal through – Gas Regulation 2010
. About Pillsbury’s Energy Practice
Pillsbury has advised on precedent-setting energy industry deals and projects in 75 countries worldwide,
offering clients a combination of geographic reach, legal and regulatory depth, and energy-sector-specific
experience that is unmatched among the world’s leading law firms.
An Energy Industry Powerhouse
Pillsbury’s strategic mergers over the past 10 years have brought together three top energy teams, creating
one of the legal industry’s largest and most preeminent practices. We have led large-scale energy projects
and their financings in every major world market, providing the big-picture and small-detail experience that we
bring to every client engagement.
Sector-Specific Smarts
We are one of only a few law firms serving the industry across all fuel lines, from petroleum and natural gas to
nuclear and renewables. As a result, we offer our energy clients deep industry experience in oil and gas, LNG,
and all forms of power—whether generated from gas, hydro, coal, nuclear or renewable sources.
The Leading Edge for Cross-Border Work
Our closely integrated team covers the world’s energy and finance capitals and is backed by an extensive
network of host-country law firm contacts, enabling us to provide flexible and efficient legal counsel
wherever—and whenever—you need it. More than half of our work is international, including assistance to
inbound clients on U.S.
regulatory requirements as well as projects encompassing operations or investments in
Canada, various Gulf States, India, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Pakistan, Russia and other locations in Africa, Asia,
Europe and South America.
About Our Firm
Pillsbury is a full-service law firm with market-leading strengths in the energy, financial services, real estate
and technology sectors. With offices in the world’s major financial and technology centers, we counsel clients
on all aspects of global transactions and litigation. Our multidisciplinary teams allow us to anticipate trends and
offer a 360-degree perspective on complex business and legal issues—helping clients take greater advantage
of opportunities and better mitigate risk.
To learn more, visit www.pillsburylaw.com.
.
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
www.pillsburylaw.com
.