Hospitality Advisory
March 17, 2016
Hotels, Hospitality and Guest Privacy: Six Important
Questions to Ask After the Andrews Verdict
Earlier this month, a Nashville jury awarded sportscaster Erin Andrews $55 million after
she sued the companies that franchise, own and operate a hotel, alleging that the hotel
improperly gave her private information to another guest, who then invaded her privacy.
The following is a list of questions that savvy hoteliers should be asking in order to help
protect themselves in the wake of the Andrews verdict.
For more information, please contact
any of the following members of Katten’s
Hospitality practice.
Christina E. Hassan
+1.202.625.3620
christina.hassan@kattenlaw.com
Terry Green
+44 (0) 20 7776 7634
terry.green@kattenlaw.co.uk
1. Do We Have Policies and Procedures in Place That Reflect Our Commitment to
Guest Privacy?
Claudia Callaway
The first question for any owner or manager is whether a comprehensive set of policies and
procedures are in place that accurately reflect your company’s commitment to the privacy
of its hotel, restaurant and spa guests. Do these policies and procedures comply with
applicable state and federal law? Is the management group bound by any property owner
policies and procedures? Is a state or federal privacy disclosure required in the spa or salon?
Tanya L. Curtis
+1.202.625.3590
claudia.callaway@kattenlaw.com
+1.312.902.5593
tanya.curtis@kattenlaw.com
2.
Do We Have a Mechanism to Track Employee Privacy Training?
During the Andrews action, some hotel employees testified that they could not recall
the property’s privacy policies. Does your company have a robust training and tracking
system for its policies and procedures? Has your company developed periodic testing on
such policies? Does the operative franchise or property management agreement require
such training and/or testing?
3. What Do Our Property Management Contracts Say About Liability and
Indemnification?
In the Andrews action, the court dismissed the franchisor prior to trial based upon its lack
of action related to Ms. Andrews’s claims.
What do your company’s management and/
or franchise agreements say about similar actions—and responsibility for the outcomes
arising from the same?
4. Do We Have Appropriate Safeguards in Place to Prevent Unauthorized Access to
Internal House Phones and Computers?
In the Andrews matter, the defendant testified at deposition that he learned of Ms.
Andrews’s room number by accessing a phone at the hotel restaurant’s hostess stand that
had an LCD screen that displayed the room number of guest to whom a call was made—
he dialed the operator, asked to be connected to Ms. Andrews, and captured the room
number that appeared on the LCD screen. Could this type of unauthorized access happen
at your property? In addition to password protecting computer terminals and requiring
a key to access point of sale terminals, consider requiring a personal code for calls made
from “publicly” located internal phones.
www.kattenlaw.com
.
5. Is Our Data Encrypted?
In many cases, commercially reasonable encryption can be the difference between a “data incident” and a data breach disaster. For
example, many states have provisions in their data incident notification laws that exempt a company from notifying consumers
regarding a data breach where the company encrypted the subject data.
6. Do We Have Insurance Coverage for Data Incidents?
Data incidents come in many different forms, ranging from an anonymous system hack from outside of the country, to the
installation of point-of-sale “skimmers” that capture credit card data, to unauthorized, “on-property” access of guest information.
Does your company have coverage for any or all of these incidents? To whom does that coverage apply and what are its limits?
www.kattenlaw.com
AUSTIN | CENTURY  CITY | CHARLOTTE | CHICAGO | HOUSTON | IRVING | LONDON | LOS  ANGELES | NEW  YORK | ORANGE  COUNTY | SAN  FRANCISCO  BAY  AREA | SHANGHAI | WASHINGTON,  DC
Attorney advertising. Published as a source of information only. The material contained herein is not to be construed as legal advice or opinion.
©2016 Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP.
All rights reserved.
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP is an Illinois limited liability partnership including professional corporations that has elected to be governed by the Illinois Uniform Partnership Act (1997).
London: Katten Muchin Rosenman UK LLP.
2
3/15/16
.